Abstract
Exploring the structure, function, and dynamics of regional sustainability system (as ecosystem) can help providing insights into the importance of how environmental management answers to socioeconomic and environmental changes for transitioning to sustainable development. The connectivity (structure) and stability (function) of regional sustainability system are investigated through making regional radiation capability model and spatial coordination index model, which is relied on how keystone province influences the other provinces from society, economy and environment dimensions. The brand new models are then applied to the two largest urban agglomerations in China during period 2001–2014. The results show that the connectivity and stability in BHR are distinctly weaker than in YRD, and reveal the essential characteristics and underlying drivers of regional sustainability system. To be specific, initially, it reflects that on the whole BHR harbors larger difference and lower radiation capability than YRD. Additionally, the regional sustainability system of YRD has much higher stability and better interactive function than of BHR. Thirdly, although the sustainable development level of both BHR and YRD increases at a certain speed year by year, the disparity among various provinces shows an apparent decline and the contribution mainly comes from intra-BHR. Finally, it also provides that how the key province and the surrounding province interact and what the main contributors to the dynamics of regional sustainability system are. Overall, taking regional sustainability system as ecosystem can well reveal this complex system and can provide references to any other urban agglomerations in worldwide.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, M. J., Crist, T. O., Chase, J. M., et al. (2011). Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: A roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecology Letters, 14(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x.
Anderson, S. J., Volker, J. X., & Phillips, M. D. (2010). Converse’s breaking-point model revised. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 3, 1–10.
Cavagna, G. A., Heglund, N. C., & Taylor, C. R. (1977). Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure. American Journal of Physiology, 233(5), R243–R261.
Chen, B., & Chen, G. Q. (2007). Modified ecological footprint accounting and analysis based on embodied exergy—A case study of the Chinese society 1981–2001. Ecological Economics, 61, 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.009.
Chen, X., Liu, X., & Hu, D. (2015). Assessment of sustainable development: A case study of Wuhan as a pilot city in China. Ecological Indicators, 50, 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.002.
Cheng, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., et al. (2013). Changing rural development inequality in Jilin Province, Northeast China. Chinese Geographical Science, 23(5), 620–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-013-0629-2.
Cramer, W. (2013). Regional environmental change refocuses on sustainability and the human–environment relationship. Regional Environmental Change, 13(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0404-z.
Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind: The anthropocene. Nature, 415, 23. https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a.
Dittmar, M. (2014). Development towards sustainability: How to judge past and proposed policies? Science of the Total Environment, 472, 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.020.
Dong, L., & Liang, H. W. (2014). Spatial analysis on China’s regional air pollutants and CO2 emissions: Emission pattern and regional disparity. Atmospheric Environment, 92, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.032.
Ehrlich, P. R., & Holden, J. P. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171, 1212–1217.
Estoque, R. C., & Murayama, Y. (2014). Social-ecological status index: A preliminary study of its structural composition and application. Ecological Indicators, 43, 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.031.
Finlay, J. C. (2011). Stream size and human influences on ecosystem production in river networks. Ecosphere, 2(8), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1890/es11-00071.1.
Giddings, B., Hopwood, B., & O’brien, G. (2002). Environment, economy and society: Fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 10(4), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.199.
Hampl, N., & Loock, M. (2013). Sustainable development in retailing: What is the impact on store choice? Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(3), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1748.
Hermans, F. L. P., Haarmann, W. M. F., & Dagevos, J. F. (2011). Evaluation of stakeholder participation in monitoring regional sustainable development. Regional Environmental Change, 11(4), 805–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-011-0216-y.
Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2014). Sustainable development: Our common future revisited. Global Environmental Change, 26, 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.006.
Huff, D. L. (1964). Defining and estimating a trading area. The Journal of Marketing, 28, 34–38.
Jost, L. (2007). Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology, 88(10), 2427–2439. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1736.1.
Kate, R., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., et al. (2001). Environment and development: Sustainability science. Science, 292, 641–642. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059386.
Levy, M., & Goldenberg, J. (2014). The gravitational law of social interaction. Physica A, 393, 418–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.08.067.
Libralato, S., Christense, V., & Pauly, D. (2006). A method for identifying keystone species in food web models. Ecological Modelling, 195(3), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.11.029.
Liu, J. (2010). China’s road to sustainability. Science, 328, 50. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186234.
Lyons, K. G., Brigham, C. A., Traut, B. H., et al. (2005). Rare species and ecosystem functioning. Conservation Biology, 19(4), 1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00106.x.
Ma, S. J., & Wang, R. S. (1984). The social–economic–natural complex ecosystem. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 4, 1–9 (in Chinese).
Mace, G. M., Norris, K., & Fitter, A. H. (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006.
Mori, K., & Christodoulou, A. (2012). Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new city Sustainability Index. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.001.
Qi, Y., Yang, Y., & Jin, F. (2013). China’s economic development stage and its spatio-temporal evolution: A prefectural-level analysis. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 23(2), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-013-1011-0.
Resende, M. (2007). Structure, conduct and performance: A simultaneous equations investigation for the Brazilian manufacturing industry. Applied Economics, 39, 937–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500461949.
Salvati, L., & Carlucci, M. (2014). A composite index of sustainable development at the local scale: Italy as a case study. Ecological Indicators, 43, 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.021.
Salvati, L., Ridolfi, E., Pujol, D. S., et al. (2016). Latent sprawl, divided Mediterranean landscapes: Urban growth, swimming pools, and the socio-spatial structure of Athens, Greece. Urban Geography, 37(2), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.046.
Shaker, R. R., & Zubalsky, S. L. (2015). Examining patterns of sustainability across Europe: A multivariate and spatial assessment of 25 composite indices. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 22, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2014.923058.
Simini, F., González, M. C., Maritan, A., et al. (2012). A universal model for mobility and migration patterns. Nature, 484(7392), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10856.
Singh, R. K., Murty, H., Gupta, S. K., et al. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 15, 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011.
Sørensen, T. (1948). A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biologiske Skrifter, 5, 1–34.
Sun, J., & Xu, C. Z. (2011). The construction and application of the” economic gravity” model on the perspective of spatial economics—Example from the economic data of Yangtze River Delta in 2010. Economist, 7, 006 (in Chinese).
Swart, R. J., Raskin, P., & Robinson, J. (2004). The problem of the future: Sustainability science and scenario analysis. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.002.
Tan, F., Jiang, X., & Lu, Z. (2017). Some enlightenment on stakeholder engagement: An Inquiry into sustainable development disparity and its drivers in China’s two leading economic zones. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1686.
Tan, F., & Lu, Z. (2015a). Study on the interaction and relation of society, economy and environment based on PCA–VAR model: As a case study of the Bohai Rim region, China. Ecological Indicators, 48, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.036.
Tan, F., & Lu, Z. (2015b). Interaction characteristics and development pattern of sustainability system in BHR (Bohai Rim) and YRD (Yangtze River) regions, China. Ecological Informatics, 30, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.09.008.
Tokimatsu, K., Ii, R., Yamaguchi, R., Sato, M., et al. (2013). Measuring future paths of alternative sustainability indicators: An assessment of IPCC SRES scenarios. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 4, 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2013.791346.
Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Meyer, W. B., Dow, K. M., Golding, D., Kasperson, J. X., et al. (1990). Two types of global environmental change: Definitional and spatial-scale issues in their human dimensions. Global Environmental Change, 1, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-3780(90)90004-S.
Wallis, A. M., Graymore, M. L. M., & Richards, A. J. (2011). Significance of environment in the assessment of sustainable development: The case for south west Victoria. Ecological Economics, 70(4), 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.010.
Wang, S., & Bian, X. (2008). Improved method of ecological footprint—Funing County ecological economic system assessments. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(3), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9067-y.
Wang, R., Li, F., Hu, D., et al. (2011). Understanding eco-complexity: Social–economic–natural complex ecosystem approach. Ecological Complexity, 8(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.11.001.
Wang, S. J., Ma, H., & Zhao, Y. B. (2014). Exploring the relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment—A case study of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. Ecological Indicators, 45, 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.006.
Wu, H. Q., Shi, Y., et al. (2014). Effectiveness of the policy of circular economy in China: A DEA-based analysis for the period of 11th five-year-plan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 83, 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.10.003.
Wuelser, G., Pohl, C., & Hadorn, G. H. (2012). Structuring complexity for tailoring research contributions to sustainable development: A framework. Sustainability Science, 7, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0143-3.
York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46, 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00188-5.
Yu, L., Hou, X., Gao, M., et al. (2010). Assessment of coastal zone sustainable development: A case study of Yantai, China. Ecological Indicators, 10, 1218–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.04.003.
Zhang, K., Li, Y. P., Huang, G. H., You, L., & Jin, S. W. (2015). Modeling for regional ecosystem sustainable development under uncertainty—A case study of Dongying, China. Science of the Total Environment, 533, 462–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.128.
Zipf, G. K. (1946). The P1 P2/D hypothesis: On the intercity movement of persons. American Sociological Review, 11, 677–686.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for support from the fund projects: the National Natural Science Foundation Programs of China (No. 71603111), the General project supported by the Philosophy and Social Science Fund in Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (2016SJB790015), A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and the Open Research Fund Program of Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Science for Yellow River Delta (Binzhou University) (2015KFJJ04). We are also grateful for the reviewers providing the positive and constructive comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, F., Lu, Z. Regional sustainability system as ecosystem: case study of China’s two leading economic circles from a keystone perspective. Environ Dev Sustain 21, 961–983 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-0068-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-0068-9