Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A sustainable method for optimizing product design with trade-off between life cycle cost and environmental impact

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In today’s competitive market, corporations have learned that taking sustainability issues into account can significantly improve their public image. Modern producers therefore must simultaneously reduce the environmental impact of their products and make economic gains. Therefore, making trade-offs between economic and environmental issues is required to ensure a company’s continuity. In doing so, companies have attached a great deal of importance to the new product design phase. However, optimization at the design stage becomes very complex for a product with a large number of parts, which can have several design alternatives with similar forms and functionality, but different costs and environmental impacts. In the automobile, shipbuilding and aircraft industries, if the conventional complete enumeration method is applied, the time required for selecting the optimal combination of design alternatives with respect to life cycle cost and environmental impact may exceed a human’s natural life span. To overcome this limitation, this paper introduces an optimization method for use as a design aid tool that enables a designer to assess the life cycle cost and environmental impact of his/her design very early in the product development process. To support the developed method, an illustration is provided using a case study on a locally manufactured automobile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ameli, M., Mansour, S., & Ahmadi-Javid, A. (2016). A multi-objective model for selecting design alternatives and end-of-life options under uncertainty: a sustainable approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 109, 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardente, F., Pastor, M. C., Mathieux, F., & Peiró, L. T. (2015). Analysis of end-of-life treatments of commercial refrigerating appliances: bridging product and waste policies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 101, 42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J. (2003). Production, consumption and the world summit on sustainable development. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 5, 63–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behdad, S., Kwak, M. J., Kim, H., & Thurston, D. (2010). Simultaneous selective disassembly and end-of-Life decision making for multiple products that share disassembly operations. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behdad, S., & Thurston, D. (2012). Disassembly and reassembly sequence planning tradeoffs under uncertainty for product maintenance. Journal of Mechanical Design, 134, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, T.-A., & Che, Z. H. (2015). A decision-making methodology for low-carbon electronic product design. Decision Support Systems, 71, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, G., He, Y., Qin, S., Jia, M., & Li, R. (2012). A holistic product design and analysis model and its application in railway vehicle systems design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Engineering Manufacture, 227, 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU commission (2016). Reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars. Climate Action. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles/cars/index_en.htm. Accessed in Sept 2016.

  • Gonza´lez, B., & Adenso-Dı´az, B. (2005). A bill of materials-based approach for end-of-life decision making in design for the environment. International Journal of Production Research, 43, 2071–2099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, P., & Wright, G. (2014). Decision analysis for management judgment (5th ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinijou, S. A., Mansour, S., & Akbarpour Shirazi, M. (2014). Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19, 620–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. C., Liang, W. Y., & Yi, S. R. (2015). Cloud-based design for disassembly to create environmentally friendly products. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1093-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucukkoc, I., Buyukozkan, K., Satoglu, S. I., & Zhang, D. Z. (2015). A mathematical model and artificial bee colony algorithm for the lexicographic bottleneck mixed-model assembly line balancing problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1150-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, T. C., Chen, H. M., Liu, C. Y., Tu, J.-C., & Yeh, T.-C. (2014). Applying multi-objective planning in low-carbon product design. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 15, 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagaros, N. D., & Karlaftis, M. G. (2015). Life-cycle cost structural design optimization of steel wind towers. Computers & Structures. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.09.013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le, T. P. N., & Lee, T.-R. (2013). Model selection with considering the CO2 emission alone the global supply chain. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24, 653–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-H. (2011). Integrating carbon footprint into supply chain management: the case of Hyundai Motor Company (HMC) in the automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 1216–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, M., & Xue, D. (2016). Development of adaptable products based on modular design and optimization methods. Procedia CIRP, 50, 70–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascle, C., & Zhao, H. P. (2008). Integrating environmental consciousness in product/process development based on lifecycle thinking. International Journal of Production Economics, 112, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordouei, M. H., Elkamel, A., Dusseault, M. B., & Alhajri, I. (2015). New sustainability indices for product design employing environmental impact and risk reduction: case study on gasoline blends. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, L., Schröder, K., & Teipel, F. (2015). Assessing environmental and social impacts. Econsense—Forum for Sustainable Development of German Business.

  • Schuller, O., Hassel, F., Kokborg, M., Thylmann, D., Stoffregen, A., Schöll, S., et al. (2013). GaBi database and modelling principles 2013. Leinfelden–Echterdingen: PE International AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shokohyar, S., Mansour, S., & Karimi, B. (2014). A model for integrating services and product EOL management in sustainable product service system (S-PSS). Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25, 427–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J. S., & Lee, K. M. (2010). Development of a low-carbon product design system based on embedded GHG emissions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 547–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, J. C. P., Chu, C.-H., & Wang, Y.-T. (2012). A decision support system to estimate the carbon emission and cost of product designs. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 13, 1037–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2011). Product design and development (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkama, J., & Keskinen, M. (2008). Comparison of simplified LCA variations for three LCA cases of electronic products from the ecodesign point of view. Paper presented at the IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, San Francisco, May 19–22.

  • Vinodh, S. (2011). Sustainable design of sprocket using CAD and design optimisation. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 13, 939–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, D. E. (2004). Mechanical assemblies: their design, manufacture, and role in product development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, J., Feng, C., & Cheng, K. (2012). Sustainability-oriented product modular design using kernel-based fuzzy c-means clustering and genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 226, 1635–1647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank SAPCO, the exclusive supplier of parts for IKCO, for providing the required information about parts. We are also thankful to Thinkstep for providing the GaBi software package for our calculations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeed Mansour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ameli, M., Mansour, S. & Ahmadi-Javid, A. A sustainable method for optimizing product design with trade-off between life cycle cost and environmental impact. Environ Dev Sustain 19, 2443–2456 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9864-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9864-x

Keywords

Navigation