Abstract
In today’s competitive market, corporations have learned that taking sustainability issues into account can significantly improve their public image. Modern producers therefore must simultaneously reduce the environmental impact of their products and make economic gains. Therefore, making trade-offs between economic and environmental issues is required to ensure a company’s continuity. In doing so, companies have attached a great deal of importance to the new product design phase. However, optimization at the design stage becomes very complex for a product with a large number of parts, which can have several design alternatives with similar forms and functionality, but different costs and environmental impacts. In the automobile, shipbuilding and aircraft industries, if the conventional complete enumeration method is applied, the time required for selecting the optimal combination of design alternatives with respect to life cycle cost and environmental impact may exceed a human’s natural life span. To overcome this limitation, this paper introduces an optimization method for use as a design aid tool that enables a designer to assess the life cycle cost and environmental impact of his/her design very early in the product development process. To support the developed method, an illustration is provided using a case study on a locally manufactured automobile.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ameli, M., Mansour, S., & Ahmadi-Javid, A. (2016). A multi-objective model for selecting design alternatives and end-of-life options under uncertainty: a sustainable approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 109, 123–136.
Ardente, F., Pastor, M. C., Mathieux, F., & Peiró, L. T. (2015). Analysis of end-of-life treatments of commercial refrigerating appliances: bridging product and waste policies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 101, 42–52.
Barber, J. (2003). Production, consumption and the world summit on sustainable development. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 5, 63–93.
Behdad, S., Kwak, M. J., Kim, H., & Thurston, D. (2010). Simultaneous selective disassembly and end-of-Life decision making for multiple products that share disassembly operations. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132, 1–9.
Behdad, S., & Thurston, D. (2012). Disassembly and reassembly sequence planning tradeoffs under uncertainty for product maintenance. Journal of Mechanical Design, 134, 1–9.
Chiang, T.-A., & Che, Z. H. (2015). A decision-making methodology for low-carbon electronic product design. Decision Support Systems, 71, 1–13.
Ding, G., He, Y., Qin, S., Jia, M., & Li, R. (2012). A holistic product design and analysis model and its application in railway vehicle systems design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Engineering Manufacture, 227, 173–186.
EU commission (2016). Reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars. Climate Action. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles/cars/index_en.htm. Accessed in Sept 2016.
Gonza´lez, B., & Adenso-Dı´az, B. (2005). A bill of materials-based approach for end-of-life decision making in design for the environment. International Journal of Production Research, 43, 2071–2099.
Goodwin, P., & Wright, G. (2014). Decision analysis for management judgment (5th ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.
Hosseinijou, S. A., Mansour, S., & Akbarpour Shirazi, M. (2014). Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19, 620–645.
Huang, C. C., Liang, W. Y., & Yi, S. R. (2015). Cloud-based design for disassembly to create environmentally friendly products. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1093-x.
Kucukkoc, I., Buyukozkan, K., Satoglu, S. I., & Zhang, D. Z. (2015). A mathematical model and artificial bee colony algorithm for the lexicographic bottleneck mixed-model assembly line balancing problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1150-5.
Kuo, T. C., Chen, H. M., Liu, C. Y., Tu, J.-C., & Yeh, T.-C. (2014). Applying multi-objective planning in low-carbon product design. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 15, 241–249.
Lagaros, N. D., & Karlaftis, M. G. (2015). Life-cycle cost structural design optimization of steel wind towers. Computers & Structures. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.09.013.
Le, T. P. N., & Lee, T.-R. (2013). Model selection with considering the CO2 emission alone the global supply chain. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24, 653–672.
Lee, K.-H. (2011). Integrating carbon footprint into supply chain management: the case of Hyundai Motor Company (HMC) in the automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 1216–1223.
Martinez, M., & Xue, D. (2016). Development of adaptable products based on modular design and optimization methods. Procedia CIRP, 50, 70–75.
Mascle, C., & Zhao, H. P. (2008). Integrating environmental consciousness in product/process development based on lifecycle thinking. International Journal of Production Economics, 112, 5–17.
Ordouei, M. H., Elkamel, A., Dusseault, M. B., & Alhajri, I. (2015). New sustainability indices for product design employing environmental impact and risk reduction: case study on gasoline blends. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 312–320.
Schneider, L., Schröder, K., & Teipel, F. (2015). Assessing environmental and social impacts. Econsense—Forum for Sustainable Development of German Business.
Schuller, O., Hassel, F., Kokborg, M., Thylmann, D., Stoffregen, A., Schöll, S., et al. (2013). GaBi database and modelling principles 2013. Leinfelden–Echterdingen: PE International AG.
Shokohyar, S., Mansour, S., & Karimi, B. (2014). A model for integrating services and product EOL management in sustainable product service system (S-PSS). Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25, 427–440.
Song, J. S., & Lee, K. M. (2010). Development of a low-carbon product design system based on embedded GHG emissions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 547–556.
Su, J. C. P., Chu, C.-H., & Wang, Y.-T. (2012). A decision support system to estimate the carbon emission and cost of product designs. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 13, 1037–1045.
Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2011). Product design and development (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Valkama, J., & Keskinen, M. (2008). Comparison of simplified LCA variations for three LCA cases of electronic products from the ecodesign point of view. Paper presented at the IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, San Francisco, May 19–22.
Vinodh, S. (2011). Sustainable design of sprocket using CAD and design optimisation. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 13, 939–951.
Whitney, D. E. (2004). Mechanical assemblies: their design, manufacture, and role in product development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yan, J., Feng, C., & Cheng, K. (2012). Sustainability-oriented product modular design using kernel-based fuzzy c-means clustering and genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 226, 1635–1647.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank SAPCO, the exclusive supplier of parts for IKCO, for providing the required information about parts. We are also thankful to Thinkstep for providing the GaBi software package for our calculations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ameli, M., Mansour, S. & Ahmadi-Javid, A. A sustainable method for optimizing product design with trade-off between life cycle cost and environmental impact. Environ Dev Sustain 19, 2443–2456 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9864-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9864-x