Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A pilot study of a culturally-appropriate, educational intervention to increase participation in cancer clinical trials among African Americans and Latinos

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

Culturally-appropriate, educational programs are recommended to improve cancer clinical trial participation among African Americans and Latinos. This study investigated the effect of a culturally-appropriate, educational program on knowledge, trust in medical researchers, and intent for clinical trial participation among African Americans and Latinos in Middle Tennessee.

Method

Trained community health educators delivered a 30-min presentation with video testimonials to 198 participants in 13 town halls. A pre-post survey design was used to evaluate the intervention among 102 participants who completed both pre- and post-surveys one to two weeks after the session.

Results

Paired-sample t-test showed significant increases in unadjusted mean scores for knowledge (p < 0.001), trust in medical researchers (p < 0.001), and willingness to participate in clinical trials (p = 0.003) after the town halls in the overall sample. After adjusting for gender and education, all three outcomes remained significant for the overall sample (knowledge: p < 0.001; trust in medical researchers: p < 0.001; willingness: p = 0.001) and for African Americans (knowledge: p < 0.001; trust in medical researchers: p = 0.007; willingness: p = 0.005). However, willingness to participate was no longer significant for Latinos (knowledge: p < 0.001; trust in medical researchers: p = 0.034; willingness: p = 0.084).

Conclusions

The culturally-appropriate, educational program showed promising results for short-term, clinical trial outcomes. Further studies should examine efficacy to improve research participation outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data are not publicly available due to the inclusion of information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent.

References

  1. DeSantis CE, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Jemal A, Siegel RL (2019) Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69(3):211–233. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Ortiz AP et al (2018) Cancer statistics for hispanics/latinos, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):425–445. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP (2004) Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA 291(22):2720–2726. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.22.2720

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tejeda HA, Green SB, Trimble EL et al (1996) Representation of African-Americans, Hispanics, and whites in National Cancer Institute cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 88(12):812–816. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-018-0102-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ambrosone CB, Nesline MK, Davis W (2006) Establishing a cancer center data bank and biorepository for multidisciplinary research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15(9):1575–1577. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dang JH, Rodriguez EM, Luque JS, Erwin DO, Meade CD, Chen MS Jr (2014) Engaging diverse populations about biospecimen donation for cancer research. J Community Genet 5(4):313–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-014-0186-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen MS Jr, Lara PN, Dang JH, Paterniti DA, Kelly K (2014) Twenty years post-NIH Revitalization Act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trials. Cancer 120(Suppl 7):1091–1096. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Simon MA, de la Riva EE, Bergan R et al (2014) Improving diversity in cancer research trials: the story of the Cancer Disparities Research Network. J Cancer Educ 29(2):366–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0617-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. George S, Duran N, Norris K (2014) A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. Am J Public Health 104(2):e16–e31. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301706

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamel LM, Penner LA, Albrecht TL, Heath E, Gwede CK, Eggly S (2016) Barriers to clinical trial enrollment in racial and ethnic minority patients with cancer. Cancer Control 23(4):327–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/107327481602300404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hillyer GC, Beauchemin M, Hershman DL et al (2020) Discordant attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trial participation between physicians, research staff, and cancer patients. Clin Trials 17(2):184–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774520901514

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rivers DA, Pal T, Vadaparampil ST, Adams LA, Dash-Pitts L, Quinn GP (2019) A community-academic partnership to explore informational needs of African American women as a primer for cancer clinical trial recruitment. Ethn Health 24(6):679–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2017.1367762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Unger JM, Cook E, Tai E, Bleyer A (2016) The role of clinical trial participation in cancer research: barriers, evidence, and strategies. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 35:185–198. https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_156686

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedman DB, Foster C, Bergeron CD, Tanner A, Kim SH (2015) A qualitative study of recruitment barriers, motivators, and community-based strategies for increasing clinical trials participation among rural and urban populations. Am J Health Promot 29(5):332–338. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.130514-QUAL-247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brandberg Y, Johansson H, Bergenmar M (2016) Patients’ knowledge and perceived understanding—associations with consenting to participate in cancer clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2:6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2015.12.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Friedman DB, Bergeron CD, Foster C, Tanner A, Kim SH (2013) What do people really know and think about clinical trials? A comparison of rural and urban communities in the South. J Community Health 38(4):642–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9659-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pelto DJ, Sadler GR, Njoku O et al (2016) Adaptation of a cancer clinical trials education program for african american and latina/o community members. Health Educ Behav 43(4):381–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198115610555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chalela P, Muñoz E, Gallion KJ, Kaklamani V, Ramirez AG (2018) Empowering Latina breast cancer patients to make informed decisions about clinical trials: a pilot study. Transl Behav Med 8(3):439–449. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibx083

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Du W, Mood D, Gadgeel S, Simon MS (2008) An educational video to increase clinical trials enrollment among lung cancer patients. J Thorac Oncol 3(1):23–29. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31815e8bb2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Du W, Mood D, Gadgeel S, Simon MS (2009) An educational video to increase clinical trials enrollment among breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117(2):339–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0311-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fouad MN, Acemgil A, Bae S et al (2016) Patient navigation as a model to increase participation of African Americans in cancer clinical trials. J Oncol Pract 12(6):556–563. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2015.008946

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Frew PM, Schamel JT, O’Connell KA, Randall LA, Boggavarapu S (2015) Results of a community randomized study of a faith-based education program to improve clinical trial participation among African Americans. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(1):ijerph13010041. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Green MA, Michaels M, Blakeney N et al (2015) Evaluating a community-partnered cancer clinical trials pilot intervention with African American communities. J Cancer Educ 30(1):158–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0764-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Robinson BN, Newman AF, Tefera E et al (2017) Video intervention increases participation of black breast cancer patients in therapeutic trials. NPJ Breast Cancer 3:36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-017-0039-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Skinner JS, Fair AM, Holman AS, Boyer AP, Wilkins CH (2019) The impact of an educational video on clinical trial enrollment and knowledge in ethnic minorities: a randomized control trial. Front Public Health 7:104. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00104

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sadler GR, Gonzalez J, Mumman M et al (2010) Adapting a program to inform African American and hispanic American women about cancer clinical trials. J Cancer Educ 25(2):142–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-009-0032-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Blakeney N, Michaels M, Green M et al (2015) Collaborative development of clinical trials education programs for African-American community-based organizations. J Cancer Educ 30(2):400–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0673-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ford M, Wahlquist A, Blake R et al (2014) Assessing an intervention to improve clinical trial perceptions among predominately African-American Communities in South Carolina. Prog Community Health Partnersh 6(3):249–263. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2012.0038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lucas T, Hayman LW Jr, Blessman JE, Asabigi K, Novak JM (2016) Gain versus loss-framed messaging and colorectal cancer screening among African Americans: a preliminary examination of perceived racism and culturally targeted dual messaging. Br J Health Psychol 21(2):249–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McLeroy KR, Norton BL, Kegler MC, Burdine JN, Sumaya CV (2003) Community-based interventions. Am J Public Health 93(4):529–533. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.93.4.529

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kiviniemi MT, Saad-Harfouche FG, Ciupak GL et al (2013) Pilot intervention outcomes of an educational program for biospecimen research participation. J Cancer Educ 28(1):52–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0434-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Patel K, Inman W, Gishe J et al (2018) A community-driven intervention for improving biospecimen donation in African American Communities. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 5(1):15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-017-0336-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rodriguez EM, Saad-Harfouche FG, Miller A et al (2016) Engaging diverse populations in biospecimen donation: results from the Hoy y Manana study. J Community Genet 7(4):271–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-016-0275-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zuniga ML, Blanco E, Martinez P, Strathdee SA, Gifford AL (2007) Perceptions of barriers and facilitators to participation in clinical trials in HIV-positive Latinas: a pilot study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 16(9):1322–1330. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2006.0234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Davis TC, Arnold CL, Mills G, Miele L (2019) A Qualitative Study exploring barriers and facilitators of enrolling underrepresented populations in clinical trials and biobanking. Front Cell Dev Biol 7:74. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2019.00074

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Heredia NI, Krasny S, Strong LL et al (2017) Community perceptions of biobanking participation: a qualitative study among Mexican-Americans in Three Texas Cities. Public Health Genomics 20(1):46–57. https://doi.org/10.1159/000452093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kreuter MW, Wray RJ (2003) Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav 27(Suppl 3):S227-232. https://doi.org/10.5993/ajhb.27.1.s3.6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hohl SD, Thompson B, Krok-Schien JL et al (2016) Characterizing community health workers on research teams: results from centers for population health and health disparities. Am J Public Health 106(4):664–670. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302980

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Malcarney MB, Pittman P, Quigley L, Horton K, Seiler N (2017) The changing roles of community health workers. Health Ser Res 52:360–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cunningham-Erves J, Barajas C, Mayo-Gamble T et al (2020) Formative research to design a culturally-appropriate cancer clinical trial education program to increase participation of African American and Latino Communities. BMC Public Health 20:840. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08939-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Etchegary H, Bishop L, Street C et al (2017) Engaging patients in health research: identifying research priorities through community town halls. BMC Health Serv Res 17:192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2138-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Ma GX, Tan Y, Blakeney NC et al (2014) The impact of a community-based clinical trial educational intervention among underrepresented Chinese Americans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 23(3):424–432. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hall MA, Camacho F, Lawlor JS, Depuy V, Sugarman J, Weinfurt K (2006) Measuring trust in medical researchers. Med Care 44(11):1048–1053. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000228023.37087.cb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Scharff DP, Mathews KJ, Jackson P, Hoffsuemmer J, Martin E, Edwards D (2010) More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation. J Health Care Poor Underserved 21(3):879–897. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0323

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Durant RW, Legedza AT, Marcantonio ER, Freeman MB, Landon BE (2011) Willingness to participate in clinical trials among African Americans and Whites previously exposed to clinical research. J Cult Divers 18(1):8–19

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Sankaré IC, Bross R, Brown AF et al (2015) Strategies to build trust and recruit African American and Latino Community residents for health research: a cohort study. Clin Transl Sci 8(5):412–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12273

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement (2011) Principles of Community Engagement, 2nd edn. National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the partner community-based organizations in the greater Nashville, Tennessee, area who collaborated with us to identify interested community members to participate in this study.

Funding

This work was supported in part by Meharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center and National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant Numbers P30 CA068485, P30 CA068485-23S5, U54 CA163072, U54 CA163069, U54 CA163066, UL1 RR024975 and UL1 TR000445.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CHW, MS, PCH, KB, and JCE participated in the conception and design of the study. CHW was responsible for obtaining ethics approval and acquiring funding, and JCE maintained ethics approval. JCE and CHW managed the study. All authors contributed to pilot study development. JCE and CB recruited and screened eligible patients and collected data. JCE, TMG, and CB were managed the data. JCE, TMG, and TL conducted data analysis, and TL, JCE, TMG, PCH and MS interpreted results. JCE drafted the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript and have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Cunningham-Erves.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All study procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of Vanderbilt University (IRB #: 171110).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cunningham-Erves, J., Mayo-Gamble, T.L., Hull, P.C. et al. A pilot study of a culturally-appropriate, educational intervention to increase participation in cancer clinical trials among African Americans and Latinos. Cancer Causes Control 32, 953–963 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-021-01449-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-021-01449-7

Keywords

Navigation