Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

What Do People Really Know and Think About Clinical Trials? A Comparison of Rural and Urban Communities in the South

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinical trials (CTs) have the potential to provide the most advanced medical treatments and screening options and help medically underserved individuals, including those in rural communities, obtain the medical care they need. Despite the need for access to care, CT participation remains low in rural communities. This study examined what individuals in both rural and urban communities of a Southeastern state know and think about CTs. Nineteen focus groups and eight interviews were conducted statewide with a total of 212 men and women. Discussions assessed participants’ beliefs, perceptions, and sources of information about CTs, and their willingness to participate in a CT. Focus group and interview transcripts were analyzed qualitatively for themes. Urban and rural participants expressed similar beliefs about CTs. Common misperceptions were that CTs were intended for people who could not afford care and that completing a survey or participating in a focus group constituted a CT. Rural residents believed that CTs involved deception more often than urban residents, and they were less willing than urban residents to participate in a CT in the future. Urban residents more frequently discussed their distrust of the medical system as a reason for not wanting to participate. Many individuals expressed that their participation would depend on whether their doctor recommended it or whether the trial would benefit a family member’s health. Findings have important implications for health communication. Messages should be developed to address misperceptions of rural and urban communities and convey the importance of CT participation to promote and protect the health of their communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Institutes of Health. (2012a). Learn about clinical studies. Retrieved December 15, from http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/info/understand#Q01.

  2. National Institutes of Health. (2012b). NIH clinical research trials and you. Retrieved December 15, from http://www.nih.gov/health/clinicaltrials/basics.htm.

  3. Robertson, N. (1994). Clinical trial participation: Viewpoints from racial/ethnic groups. In Paper presented at the national conference on clinical trials, Atlanta GA.

  4. Baquet, C. R., Commiskey, P., Daniel Mullins, C., & Mishra, S. I. (2006). Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: Socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detection and Prevention, 30(1), 24–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ford, J. G., Howerton, M. W., Bolen, S., Gary, T. L., Lai, G. Y., & Tilburt, J. (2005). Knowledge and access to information on recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment(Summary), 122, 1–11.

  6. Giuliano, A. R., Mokuau, N., Hughes, C., Tortolero-Luna, G., Risendal, B., & Ho, R. C. H. (2000). Participation of minorities in cancer research: The influence of structural, cultural, and linguistic factors. Annals of Epidemiology, 10(8 Suppl), S22–S34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guadagnolo, B. A., Petereit, D. G., Helbig, P., Koop, D., Kussman, P., Fox Dunn, E., et al. (2009). Involving American Indians and medically underserved rural populations in cancer clinical trials. Clinical Trials, 6(6), 610–617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sateren, W. B., Trimble, E. L., Abrams, J., Brawley, O., Breen, N., & Ford, L. (2002). How sociodemographics, presence of oncology specialists, and hospital cancer programs affect accrual to cancer treatment trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(8), 2109–2117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis, P. M., Butow, P. N., Tattersall, M. H., Dunn, S. M., & Houssami, N. (2001). Randomized clinical trials in oncology: Understanding and attitudes predict willingness to participate. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19(15), 3554–3561.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hudson, S. V., Momperousse, D., & Leventhal, H. (2005). Physician perspectives on cancer clinical trials and barriers to minority recruitment. Cancer Control, 12(2 Suppl), 93–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lara, P. N., Higdon, R., Lim, N., Kwan, K., Tanaka, M., & Lau, D. H. (2001). Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: Identifying potential barriers to enrollment. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19(6), 1728–1733.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Quinn, G. P., Bell, B. A., Bell, M. Y., Caraway, V. D., Conforte, D., & Graci, L. B. (2007). The guinea pig syndrome: Improving clinical trial participation among thoracic patients. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 2(3), 191–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Comis, R. L., Aldigé, C. R., Stovall, E. L., Krebs, L. U., Risher, P., & Taylor, H. (2000). A quantitative survey of public attitudes towards cancer clinical trials. The Summit Series on Clinical Trials. Retrieved December 15, 2012. http://www.cancertrialshelp.org/CTHpdf/308-9.pdf.

  14. Fouad, M. N., Partridge, E., Green, B. L., Kohler, C., Wynn, T., Nagy, S., et al. (2000). Minority recruitment in clinical trials: A conference at Tuskegee, researchers and the community. Annals of Epidemiology, 10(8), S35–S40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bennett, K., Olatosi, B., & Probst, J. (2008). Health disparities: A rural–urban chartbook. Retrieved December 15, 2012. http://rhr.sph.sc.edu/report/(7-3)%20Health%20Disparities%20A%20Rural%20Urban%20Chartbook%20-%20Distribution%20Copy.pdf.

  16. South Carolina Rural Health Research Center. (2008). State rural plan for South Carolina. In A. B. Martin (Ed.) South Carolina Rural Health Research Center, Columbia SC.

  17. Friedman, D. B., Thomas, T. L., Owens, O. L., & Hebert, J. R. (2012). It takes two to talk about prostate cancer: A qualitative assessment of African-American men’s and women’s cancer communication practices and recommendations. American Journal of Men’s Health, 6(6), 472–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Slooten, E., Friedman, D. B., & Tanner, A. (2013). Are we getting the health information we need from the mass media? An assessment of consumers’ perceptions of health and medical news. J Consumer Health Internet, 17(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Version 10; 2012.

  20. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  22. IBM Corp. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version Version 20.0). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

  23. Comis, R. L., Miller, J. D., Aldige, C. R., Krebs, L., & Stoval, E. (2003). Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21(5), 830–835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lara, P. N., Paterniti, D. A., Chiechi, C., Turrell, C., Morain, C., & Horan, N. (2005). Evaluation of factors affecting awareness of and willingness to participate in cancer clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(6), 9282–9289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bentley, J. P., & Thacker, P. G. (2004). The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30(3), 293–298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dunn, L. B., & Gordon, N. E. (2005). Improving informed consent and enhancing recruitment for research by understanding economic behavior. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 293(5), 609–612.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lemmens, T., & Elliott, C. (2001). Justice for the professional guinea pig. American Journal of Bioethics, 1(2), 51–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Langford, A., Resnicow, K., & An, L. (2010). Clinical trial awareness among racial/ethnic minorities in HINTS 2007: Sociodemographic, attitudinal, and knowledge correlates. Journal of Health Communication, 15(Suppl 3), 92–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ford, L. G., Minasian, L. M., McCaskill‐Stevens, W., Pisano, E. D., Sullivan, D., & Smith, R. A. (2009). Prevention and early detection clinical trials: Opportunities for primary care providers and their patients. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 53(2), 82–101.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Go, R. S., Frisby, K. A., Lee, J. A., Mathiason, M. A., Meyer, C. M., & Ostern, J. L. (2006). Clinical trial accrual among new cancer patients at a community-based center. Cancer, 106(2), 426–433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McCaskill-Stevens, W., Pinto, H., Marcus, A. C., Comis, R., Morgan, R., Plomer, K., et al. (1999). Recruiting minority cancer patients into cancer clinical trials: A pilot project involving the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and the National Medical Association. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17(3), 1029–1039.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mouton, C. P., Harris, S., Rovi, S., Solorzano, P., & Johnson, M. S. (1997). Barriers to black women’s participation in cancer clinical trials. Journal of the National Medical Association, 89(11), 721.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pinto, H. A., McCaskill-Stevens, W., Wolfe, P., & Marcus, A. C. (2000). Physician perspectives on increasing minorities in cancer clinical trials: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Initiative. Annals of Epidemiology, 10(8 Suppl), S78–S84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. South Carolina Institute of Medicine and Public Health. (2011). South Carolina Rural Health Report. Retrieved December 1, 2012, from http://scphi.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/rural-health-report.pdf.

  35. South Carolina Office of Primary Care. (2010). Primary care office shortage designations. Retrieved October 18, 2010, from http://www.scdhec.gov/health/opc/hpsa.htm.

  36. Jones, J. M., Nyhof-Young, J., Moric, J., Friedman, A., Wells, W., & Catton, P. (2006). Identifying motivations and barriers to patient participation in clinical trials. Journal of Cancer Education, 21(4), 237–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Movsas, B., Moughan, J., Owen, J., Coia, L. R., Zelefsky, M. J., Hanks, G., et al. (2007). Who enrolls onto clinical oncology trials? A radiation Patterns of Care Study analysis. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 68(4), 1145–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cohen, G. I. (2003). Clinical research by community oncologists. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 53(2), 73–81.

  39. Ockene, I. S., Hebert, J. R., Ockene, J. K., Merriam, P. A., Hurley, T. G., & Saperia, G. (1996). Effect of physician training and a structured office practice setting on physician delivered nutrition counseling: The Worcester area trial for counseling in hyperlipedemia (WATCH). American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12(4), 252–258.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research funded by Health Sciences South Carolina. We are grateful to Dr. Jay Moskowitz, Dr. Amy Brock Martin, our community partners, and focus group and interview participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

    Daniela B. Friedman & Caroline D. Bergeron

  2. Core Faculty, Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, room 235, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA

    Daniela B. Friedman

  3. School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA

    Caroline Foster, Andrea Tanner & Sei-Hill Kim

Authors
  1. Daniela B. Friedman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Caroline D. Bergeron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Caroline Foster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrea Tanner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sei-Hill Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela B. Friedman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, D.B., Bergeron, C.D., Foster, C. et al. What Do People Really Know and Think About Clinical Trials? A Comparison of Rural and Urban Communities in the South. J Community Health 38, 642–651 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9659-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9659-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation