Skip to main content
Log in

Antigenic features of protein carriers commonly used in immunisation trials

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Biotechnology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An aluminium hydroxide adjuvant induced a more elevated and rapid immune responses against short peptides conjugated to the Keyhole Lympet Hemocyanin carrier than immuneasy adjuvant. Furthermore, since carrier proteins may compete with the fused or chemically linked polypeptides in eliciting antigen-specific immune response, we classified the immunogenicity of the most common carrier proteins used in molecular biology for antigen expression and mouse immunisation. The disulfide isomerase protein A gave a carrier with the lowest immunogenicity whilst disulfide isomerase protein C gave the highest immunogenicity and therefore should be avoided as a fusion partner. Using this protein as a model, we identified and located the immunodominant epitopes along its sequence. These results now enable the combination of carrier and immunisation conditions to be optimized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bossi S, Ferranti B, Martinelli C, Capasso P, de Marco A (2010) Antibody-mediated purification of co-expressed antigen-antibody complexes. Protein Express Purif. doi:10.1016/j.pep.2010.01.003

  • Chiarella P, Massi E, De Robertis M, Signori E, Fazio VM (2007) Adjuvant in vaccines and for immunisation: current trends. Expert Opin Biol Ther 7:1551–1562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Marco V, Stier G, Blandin S, de Marco A (2004) Comparison of NusA and GST as fusion partners for recombinant expression in E. coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 322:766–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Masi F, Chiarella P, Wilhelm H, Massimi M, Bullard B, Ansorge W, Sawyer A (2005) High-throughput mouse monoclonal antibodies using antigen microarrays. Proteomics 5:4070–4081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di John D, Torres JR, Murillo J, Herrington DA et al (1989) Effect of priming with carrier on response to conjugate vaccine. Lancet 2:1415–1418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dümmler A, Lawrence AM, de Marco A (2005) Simplified screening for the detection of soluble fusion constructs expressed in E. coli using a modular set of vectors. Microb Cell Fact 4:34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herzenberg LA, Tokuhisa T, Herzenberg LA (1980) Carrier-priming leads to hapten-specific suppression. Nature 285:664–667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkley JE, Goldstein AL, Naylor PH (2001) Effect of peptide-carrier coupling on peptide-specific immune response. Immunobiology 203:601–615

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krieg AM (1990) Mechanisms and applications of immune stimulatory CpG oligodeoxynucleotides. Biochim Biophys Acta 1489:107–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutwiri G, Gerdts V, Lopez M, Babiul LA (2007) Innate immunity and new adjuvants. Rev Sci Tech 26:147–156

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sad S, Gupta HM, Talwar GP, Raghupathy R (1991) Carrier induced suppression of the antibody response to a “self” hapten. Immunology 74:223–227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schutze MP, Deriaud E, Przewlocki G, LeClerc C (1989) Carrier-induced epitopic suppression is initiated through clonal dominance. J Immunol 142:2635–2640

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tang HY, Speicher DW (2004) Identification of alternative products and optimization of NTCB cyanylation and cleavage at cysteine residues. Anal Biochem 334:48–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson-Welder JH, Torres MP, Kipper MJ, Mallapragada SK, Wannemuehler MJ, Narasimhan B (2009) Vaccine adjuvants: current challenge and future approaches. J Pharm Sci 98:1278–1316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank N. Rosenthal and C. Boulin for having made accessible the EMBL Facilities and M. Leuener and C. Fasci for technical assistance. PC is supported by FIRB-Idee Progettuali RBIP0695BB_001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ario de Marco.

Additional information

Purpose of work

Short-peptide immunisation remains a trial-and-error procedure; however, single components of the protocol, like the rational choice of carriers and adjuvants that can influence the animal immune response, can be optimized.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiarella, P., Edelmann, B., Fazio, V.M. et al. Antigenic features of protein carriers commonly used in immunisation trials. Biotechnol Lett 32, 1215–1221 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-010-0283-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-010-0283-z

Keywords

Navigation