A device for non-contact measurement of the error of stereotactic guidance using different types of brain neu-rosurgery equipment is presented. The targeting accuracies of two different methods of application of the Russian stereotactic system POANIC have been compared. The obtained results make it possible to dispense with mechanical modeling of the intracerebral space during surgery, leading to reductions in the duration and complexity of surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kandel’, E. I., Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1981).
Martynov, B. V., Kholyavin, A. I., Parfenov, V. E., et al., “A stereotactic cryodestruction method,” Vopr. Neirokhirurg. im. N. N. Burdenko, No. 4, 17-24 (2011).
Starr, P. A., “Placement of deep brain stimulators into the subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus internus: Technical approach,” Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg., 79, 118-145 (2002).
Anichkov, A. D., Polonsky, Y. Z., and Nizkovolos, V. B., Stereotactic Systems [in Russian], Nauka, St. Petersburg (2006).
Ellis, T. M., Foote, K. D., Fernandez, H. H., et al., “Reoperation for suboptimal outcomes after deep brain stimulation surgery,” Neurosurgery, 63, No. 4, 754-760 (2008).
Benardete, E. A., Leonard, M. A., and Weiner, H. L., “Comparison of frameless stereotactic systems: Accuracy, precision, and applications,” Neurosurgery, 49, No. 6, 1409-1415 (2001).
Maciunas, R. J., Galloway Jr, R. L., and Latimer, J. W., “The application accuracy of stereotactic frames,” Neurosurgery, 35, No. 4, 682-694 (1994).
Bjartmarz, H. and Rehncrona, S., “Comparison of accuracy and precision between frame-based and frameless stereotactic navigation for deep brain stimulation electrode implantation,” Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg., 85, No. 5, 235-242 (2007).
Henderson, J. M., Holloway, K. L., Gaede, S. E., and Rosenow, J. M., “The application accuracy of a skull-mounted trajectory guide system for image-guided functional neurosurgery,” Comput. Aided Surg., 9, No. 4, 155-160 (2004).
Nikitin, M. A., “The Oreol stereotactic manipulator,” in: Clinical Stereotaxis. Experience and Perspectives in the Use of the Russian-Made Oreol Neurosurgical Manipulator [in Russian], St. Petersburg (2001), pp. 6-8.
Anichkov, A. D., Nikitin, M. A., and Popov, A. B., A Phantom for Stereotactic Apparatus [in Russian], RF Patent No. 2023434 (1994).
Kholyavin, A. I., Nizkovolos, V. B., Anichkov, A. D., and Polonsky, Y. Z., A Method for Marking Patients’ Brains For Working with Frameless Neuronavigation [in Russian], RF Patent No. 2607404 (2007).
Kholyavin, A. I., Nizkovolos, V. B., and Bogdan, A. A., “Assessment of the targeting quality of a stereotactic instrument to an aiming point in the brain using a frameless navigation system,” Biomed. Eng., 52, 92-95 (2018).
Peskov, V. A. and Kholyavin, A. I., A Device for Modeling Stereotactic Neurosurgical Interventions [in Russian], RF Patent No. 199805 (2020).
Peskov, V. A., Kholyavin, A. I., and Polonsky, Y. Z., “Localizers for frameless neuronavigation systems,” Biomed. Eng., 54, 88-92 (2020).
Polonsky, Y. Z., Kholyavin, A. I., Martynov, B. V., et al., “Frameless computational magnetic resonance tomography with stereotactic manipulators of the Oreol class,” Vestn. Ross. Voenno- Med. Akad., No. 4 (28), 71-78 (2009).
Kholyavin, A. I. and Nizkovolos, V. B., “Precision stereotactic frameless neuronavigation,” Biomed. Eng., 50, 249-252 (2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Meditsinskaya Tekhnika, Vol. 55, No. 5, Sep.-Oct., 2021, pp. 26-29.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kholyavin, A.I., Peskov, V.A. Comparison of the Targeting Accuracy of Two Methods for Stereotactic Guidance to Target Points in the Brain. Biomed Eng 55, 337–341 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-022-10131-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-022-10131-4