Surgery restoring lost parts of the skull, i.e., cranioplasty, is widely used in neurosurgical practice. We have compared operations using patient-specific implants obtained by two different methods: formation based on anatomical models and direct three-dimensional printing (direct metal laser sintering, DMLS). Both methods gave comparable clinical efficacy, though the DMLS manufacturing process avoids the need for intermediate devices and produces the required implant directly, giving this method an advantage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aydin, S., Kucukyuruk, B., Abuzayed, B., et al., “Cranioplasty: Review of materials and technique,” J. Neurosci. Rural Pract., 2, No. 2, 162-167 (2011).
Shah, A. M., Jung, H., and Skirboll, S., “Materials used in cranio-plasty: A history and analysis,” Neurosurgery Focus, 36, No. 4, (2014); http://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS13561 (accessed December 4, 2017).
Potapov, A. A., Kravchuk, A. D., Likhterman, L. B., et al., Reconstructive Surgery for Skull Defects. Clinical Guidelines [in Russian], Moscow (2015).
Yadla, S., Campbell, P., Chitale, R., et al., “Effect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections: A systematic review,” Neurosurgery, 68, No. 4, 1124-1130 (2011).
Matsuno, A., Tanaka, H., Iwamuro, H., et al., “Analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection after delayed cranioplasty,” Acta Neurochirurgica, 148, 535-540 (2006).
Flanigan, P., Kshettry, V. R., and Benzel, E. C., “World War II, tantalum, and evolution of modern cranioplasty technique,” Neurosurgery Focus, 36, No. 4 (2014); http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS13552?url_ver=Z39.88_2003&rfr_id=ori: rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed (accessed December 4, 2017).
Levchenko, O. V., “Current methods in cranioplasty,” Neirokhirurgiya, No. 2, 5-13 (2010).
Konovalov, A. N., Potapov, A. A., and Likhterman, L. B. Surgery for the Sequelae of Craniocerebral Trauma [in Russian], Media Sfera, Moscow (2006).
Potapov, A. A., Kornienko, V. N., Kravchuk, A. D., et al., “Current technologies in the surgical treatment of the sequelae of Skull and Brain Trauma,” Vestn. Ros. Akad. Med. Nauk, No. 9, 31-38 (2012).
Konovalov, A. N., Potapov, A. A., Likhterman, L. B., et al., Reconstructive and Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Sequelae of Craniocerebral Trauma [in Russian], IP “T. A. Alekseeva,” Moscow (2012).
Eolchiyan, C. A., “Plastic surgery for complex skull defects with titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants made using CAD/CAM technologies,” Vopr. Neirokhirurg., 78, No. 4, 3-13 (2014).
Sirko, A. G. and Kirpa, I. Yu., “Reconstructive surgery of post-traumatic craniofacial defects using titanium plates made using patient-specific stereolithographic models,” Ukr. Neirokhirurg. Zh., No. 3, 54 (2010).
Honeybul, S., Morisson, D. A., Ho, K. M., et al., “A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty,” J. Neurosurg., 126, 81-90 (2017).
Luo, J. M., Liu, B., Xie, Z. Y., et al., “Comparison of manually shaped and computer shaped titanium mesh for repairing large frontotemporoparietal skull defects after traumatic brain injury,” Neurosurgery Focus, 33, No. 1 (2012); http://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/2012.2.FOCUS129 (accessed December 4, 2017).
Bonda, D. J., Manjila, S., Selman, W. R., et al., “The recent revolution in the design and manufacture of cranial implants: Modern advancements and future directions,” Neurosurgery, 77, No. 5, 814-824 (2015).
Tan, E. T., Ling, J. M., and Dinesh, S. K., “The feasibility of producing patient-specific acrylic cranioplasty implants with a low-cost 3D printer,” J. Neurosurg., 124, No. 5, 1531-1537 (2016); http://thejns.org/doi/full/10.3171/2015.5.JNS15119 (accessed December 4, 2017).
Mishinov, S. V., Stupak, V. V., Mamonova, N. V., et al., “Methods of three-dimensional prototyping and printing in reconstructive neurosurgery,” Med. Tekh., 302, No. 2, 22-26 (2017).
Mishinov, S. V., Stupak, V. V., Panchenko, A. A., et al., “Reconstruction of the fronto-zygomatico-orbital zone using patient-specific titanium implants made by direct laser sintering on a 3D printer,” Ros. Neirokhirurg. Zh. im. Prof. A. L. Polenova, 9, No. 1, 80-83 (2017).
Mukherjee, S., Thakur, B., Haq, I., et al., “Complications of titanium cranioplasty – A retrospective analysis of 174 patients,” Acta Neurochirurgica, 156, No. 5, 989-998 (2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Meditsinskaya Tekhnika, Vol. 52, No. 3, May-Jun., 2018, pp. 5-7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mishinov, S.V., Stupak, V.V., Koporushko, N.A. et al. Titanium Patient-Specific Implants in Reconstructive Neurosurgery. Biomed Eng 52, 152–155 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-018-9802-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-018-9802-3