Abstract
Several authors pointed out that left–right discrimination (LRD) tasks may be entangled with differential demands on mental rotation (MR). However, studies considering this interrelationship are rare. To differentially assess LRD of stimuli with varying additional demands on MR, we constructed and evaluated an extended version of the Bergen right–left discrimination (BRLD) test including additional subtests with inverted stickmen stimuli in 174 healthy participants (50♂, 124♀) and measured subjective reports on participants’ strategies to accomplish the task. Moreover, we analyzed practice effects and reliable change indices (RCIs) on BRLD performance, as well as gender differences. Performance significantly differed between subtests with high and low demands on MR with best scores on subtests with low demands on MR. Participants’ subjective strategies corroborate these results: MR was most frequently reported for subtests with highest MR demands (and lowest test performance). Pronounced practice effects were observed for all subtests. Sex differences were not observed. We conclude that our extended version of the BRLD allows for the differentiation between LRD with high and low demands on MR abilities. The type of stimulus materials is likely to be critical for the differential assessment of MR and LRD. Moreover, RCIs provide a basis for the clinical application of the BRLD.
References
Auer T, Schwarcz A, Aradi M, Kalmár Z, Pendleton C, Janszky I, Horváth RA, Szalay C, Dóczi T, Komoly S (2008) Right–left discrimination is related to the right hemisphere. Laterality 13(5):427–438
Baenninger M, Newcombe N (1989) The role of experience in spatial test performance: a meta-analysis. Sex Roles 20(5):327–344
Band GPH, Kok A (2000) Age effects on response monitoring in a mental-rotation task. Biol Psychol 51(2–3):201–221
Benton AL (1959) Right–left discrimination and finger localization: development and pathology. Hoeber, Oxford
Benton A (1968) Right–left discrimination. Pediatr Clin N Am 15(3):747–758
Berg C, Hertzog C, Hunt E (1982) Age differences in the speed of mental rotation. Dev Psychol 18(1):95–107
Brandt MG, Davies ET (2006) Visual-spatial ability, learning modality and surgical knot tying. Can J Surg 49(6):412–416
Cermak S (1984) Right–left discrimination in learning disabled and normal control boys. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 4(2):63–77
Chelune GJ, Naugle RI, Lüders H, Sedlak J, Awad IA (1993) Individual change after epilepsy surgery: practice effects and base-rate information. Neuropsychology 7(1):41–52
Corballis MC, Cullen S (1986) Decisions about the axes of disoriented shapes. Mem Cognit 14(1):27–38
Corballis MC, McMaster H (1996) The roles of stimulus-response compatibility and mental rotation in mirror-image and left–right decisions. Can J Exp Psychol 50(4):397–401
Dalecki M, Hoffmann U, Bock O (2012) Mental rotation of letters, body parts and complex scenes: separate or common mechanisms? Hum Mov Sci 31(5):1151–1160
Gardner MR, Potts R (2010) Hand dominance influences the processing of observed bodies. Brain Cognit 73(1):35–40
Gormley GJ, Dempster M, Best R (2008) Right–left discrimination among medical students: questionnaire and psychometric study. Br Med J 337:a2826
Guillot A, Champely S, Batier C, Thiriet P, Collet C (2007) Relationship between spatial abilities, mental rotation and functional anatomy learning. Adv Health Sci Edu 12(4):491–507
Harris IM, Harris JA, Caine D (2002) Mental-rotation deficits following damage to the right basal ganglia. Neuropsychology 16(4):524–537
Heaton RK, Temkin N, Dikmen S, Avitable N, Taylor MJ, Marcotte TD, Grant I (2001) Detecting change: a comparison of three neuropsychological methods, using normal and clinical samples. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 16(1):75–91
Heil M, Rösler F, Link M, Bajric J (1998) What is improved if a mental rotation task is repeated–the efficiency of memory access, or the speed of a transformation routine? Psychol Res 61(2):99–106
Hirnstein M, Bayer U, Ellison A, Hausmann M (2011) TMS over the left angular gyrus impairs the ability to discriminate left from right. Neuropsychologia 49(1):29–33
Hoyek N, Collet C, Rastello O, Fargier P, Thiriet P, Guillot A (2009) Enhancement of mental rotation abilities and its effect on anatomy learning. Teach Learn Med 21(3):201–206
Jansen-Osmann P, Heil M (2007) Suitable stimuli to obtain (no) gender differences in the speed of cognitive processes involved in mental rotation. Brain Cognit 64(3):217–227
Jordan K, Wüstenberg T, Jaspers-Feyer F, Fellbrich A, Peters M (2006) Sex differences in left/right confusion. Cortex 42(1):69–78
Kali Y, Orion N (1996) Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geologic structures. J Res Sci Teach 33(4):369–391
Kirasic KC (2000) Age differences in adults’ spatial abilities, learning environmental layout, and wayfinding behavior. Sp Cognit Comput 2(2):117–134
Kozhevnikov M, Kosslyn S, Shephard J (2005) Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual cognitive style. Mem Cognit 33(4):710–726
Lord SAG, Marsh GR (1975) Age differences in the speed of a spatial cognitive process. J Gerontol 30(6):674–678
Maassen GH, Bossema E, Brand N (2009) Reliable change and practice effects: outcomes of various indices compared. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 31(3):339–352
Malinowski JC (2001) Mental rotation and real-world wayfinding. Percept Mot Skills 92(1):19–30
McCaffrey RJ, Westervelt H (1995) Issues associated with repeated neuropsychological assessments. Neuropsychol Rev 5(3):203–221
McCaffrey RJ, Ortega A, Orsillo SM, Nelles WB, Haase RF (1992) Practice effects in repeated neuropsychological assessments. Clin Neuropsychol 6(1):32–42
Newcombe NS, Frick A (2010) Early education for spatial intelligence: why, what, and how. Mind Brain Educ 4(3):102–111
Ocklenburg S, Hirnstein M, Ohmann HA, Hausmann M (2011) Mental rotation does not account for sex differences in left–right confusion. Brain Cognit 76(1):166–171
Ofte SH (2002) Right–left discrimination: effects of handedness and educational background. Scand J Psychol 43(3):213–219
Ofte SH, Hugdahl K (2002a) Right–left discrimination in younger and older children measured with two tests containing stimuli on different abstraction levels. Percept Mot Skills 94(3):707–719
Ofte SH, Hugdahl K (2002b) Rightleft discrimination in male and female, young and old subjects. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 24(1):82–92
Parsons LM (1987a) Imagined spatial transformation of one’s body. J Exp Psychol Gen 116(2):172–191
Parsons LM (1987b) Imagined spatial transformations of one’s hands and feet. Cognit Psychol 19(2):178–241
Parsons TD, Notebaert AJ, Shields EW, Guskiewicz KM (2009) Application of reliable change indices to computerized neuropsychological measures of concussion. Int J Neurosci 119(4):492–507
Peters M, Laeng B, Latham K, Jackson M, Zaiyouna R, Richardson C (1995) A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test-different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain Cognit 28(1):39–58
Piaget J, Inhelder B (1948) La représentation de l’espace chez l’enfant. Presses Universitaires de Frances, Paris
Ratcliff G (1979) Spatial thought, mental rotation and the right cerebral hemisphere. Neuropsychologia 17(1):49–54
Rigal R (1996) Right–left orientation, mental rotation, and perspective-taking: when can children imagine what people see from their viewpoint? Percept Mot Skills 83(3):831–842
Shepard RN, Hurwitz S (1984) Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps. Cognit 18(1–3):161–193
Shepard RN, Metzler J (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171:701–703
Snyder TJ (1991) Self-rated right–left confusability and objectively measured right–left discrimination. Dev Neuropsychol 7(2):219–230
Terlecki MS, Newcombe NS, Little M (2008) Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: gender differences in growth patterns. Appl Cogn Psychol 22(7):996–1013
Vogeley K, Fink GR (2003) Neural correlates of the first-person-perspective. Trends Cogn Sci 7(1):38–42
Voyer D (1995) Effect of practice on laterality in a mental rotation task. Brain Cognit 29(3):326–335
Wai J, Lubinski D, Benbow CP (2009) Spatial ability for STEM domains: aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. J Educ Psychol 101(4):817–835
Wright R, Thompson WL, Ganis G, Newcombe NS, Kosslyn SM (2008) Training generalized spatial skills. Psychonomic Bull Rev 15(4):763–771
Zacks JM (2008) Neuroimaging studies of mental rotation: a meta-analysis and review. J Cognit Neurosci 20(1):1–19
Zacks JM, Mires J, Tversky B, Hazeltine E (2000) Mental spatial transformations of objects and perspective. Spatial Cognit Comput 2(4):315–332
Acknowledgments
MP and HJM are supported by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG]; EC 277). We are very thankful to Sonja Ofte for the stimuli of the Bergen right–left discrimination test. We thank our colleagues in the Physiological Psychology department and the CITmed project for their scientific and technical support and helpful advice. We especially thank Alsonso Ortega for his helpful advice concerning the statistical analyses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grewe, P., Ohmann, H.A., Markowitsch, H.J. et al. The Bergen left–right discrimination test: practice effects, reliable change indices, and strategic performance in the standard and alternate form with inverted stimuli. Cogn Process 15, 159–172 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0587-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0587-8