Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biological soil disinfestation using bioethanol fermentation products: role of residual organic substances

  • Disease Control
  • Published:
Journal of General Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy of biological soil disinfestation (BSD) using bioethanol fermentation products (ethanol fermentation solution and crude alcohol) from forage rice plants and sweet sorghum to control the soil-borne pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol), which causes Fusarium wilt of tomato. In the pot tests, the survival of bud cells markedly declined after 14 days in the soil saturated with diluted bioethanol fermentation products, which contained more than 0.25 % (v/v) ethanol. In the Fol-suppressed soil, a sudden drop of soil oxidation–reduction potential (ORP) below −200 mV and accumulation of acetic acid and Fe2+ were observed during the disinfestation treatment. The bioethanol fermentation products included a certain amount of organic acids (e.g., acetic acid and l-lactic acid) and sugars (e.g., d-glucose, sucrose, and d-xylose), and the treatment with each of these organic substances, as well as ethanol, had a fungicidal effect against Fol in the soil. Thus, the residual organic substances in the bioethanol fermentation products seemed to enhance the fungicidal effect of the ethanol-based BSD treatment. BSD tests in field soil were repeated four times during the spring and autumn for 2 years. Fol was strongly suppressed in the soil that was irrigated with 0.5 or 1.0 % (v/v) bioethanol solution and subsequently covered with a plastic film for 21 days, while the treatment with wheat bran or 1.0 % (v/v) ethanol did not always suppress Fol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Besri M, Marcotte M, Pizano M, Porter I (2010) United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) 2010 Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee. 2010 assessment. http://www.ozone.unep.org/teap/Reports/MBTOC/MBTOC-Assesment-Report-2010.pdf

  • Blok WJ, Lamers JG, Termorshuizen AJ, Bollen GJ (2000) Control of soilborne plant pathogens by incorporating fresh organic amendments followed by tarping. Phytopathology 90:253–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler DM, Rosskopf EN, Kokalis-Burelle N, Albano JP, Muramoto J, Shennan C (2012) Exploring warm-season cover crops as carbon sources for anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD). Plant Soil 355:149–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goud JC, Termorshuizen AJ, Blok WJ, van Bruggen AHC (2004) Long-term effect of biological soil disinfestation on Verticillium wilt. Plant Dis 88:688–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honda H, Ohnishi A, Fujimoto N, Suzuki M (2008) Development of a solid-state fermentation system for producing bioethanol from food waste (in Japanese). Environ Conserv Eng 37:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katase M, Kubo C, Ushio S, Ootsuka E, Takeuchi T, Mizukubo T (2009) Nematicidal activity of volatile fatty acids generated from wheat bran in reductive soil disinfestation. Nematol Res 39:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamoto HK, Horita M, Cai Y, Shinozaki Y, Sakaki K (2011) Silage produces biofuel for local consumption. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:46

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kobara Y, Uematsu S, Tanaka-Miwa C, Sato R, Sato M (2007) Possibility of the new soil fumigation technique with ethanol solution. In: Obenaug GL (ed.) Proc 2007 Ann Int Res Conf Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, pp 74.1–74.2

  • Lamers JG, Runia WT, Molendijk LPG, Bleeker PO (2010) Perspectives of anaerobic soil disinfestation. Acta Hort 883:277–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Laopaiboon L, Nuanpeng S, Srinophakun P, Klanrit P, Laopaiboon P (2009) Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice using very high gravity technology: effects of carbon and nitrogen supplementations. Bioresour Technol 100:4176–4182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Momma N, Usami T, Amemiya Y, Shishido M (2005) Factors involved in the suppression of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici by soil reduction (in Japanese with English summary). Soil Microorg 59:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Momma N, Yamamoto K, Simandi P, Shishido M (2006) Role of organic acids in the mechanisms of biological soil disinfestation (BSD). J Gen Plant Pathol 72:247–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Momma N, Momma M, Kobara Y (2010) Biological soil disinfestation using ethanol: effect on Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici and soil microorganisms. J Gen Plant Pathol 76:336–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Momma N, Kobara Y, Momma M (2011) Fe2+ and Mn2+, potential agents to induce suppression of Fusarium oxysporum for biological soil disinfestation. J Gen Plant Pathol 77:331–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Momma N, Kobara Y, Uematsu S, Kita N, Shinmura A (2013) Development of biological soil disinfestations in Japan. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:3801–3809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mowlick S, Hirota K, Takehara T, Kaku N, Ueki K, Ueki A (2012) Development of anaerobic bacterial community consisted of diverse clostridial species during biological soil disinfestation amended with plant biomass. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 58:273–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowlick S, Takehara T, Kaku N, Ueki K, Ueki A (2013) Proliferation of diversified clostridial species during biological soil disinfestation incorporated with plant biomass under various conditions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:8365–8379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murata A, Hidaka T, Kanda K, Kato F (2008) Bactericidal action of iron (II) and mechanism of the action (in Japanese with English summary). Bull Fac Agr Saga Univ 93:141–155

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura N (2007) Selective media for Fusarium oxysporum. J Gen Plant Pathol 73:342–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosskopf EN, Kokalis-Burelle N, Butler D, Muramoto J, Shennan C (2010) Development of anaerobic soil disinfestation for Florida vegetable and flower production. In: Proc 2010 Ann Int Res Conf Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reduction, pp 84.1–84.2

  • Shennan C, Muramoto J, Fennimore S, Mazzola M, Lazarovits G (2013) Non-fumigant strategies for soilborne disease control in California strawberry production systems. California Strawberry Comm Ann Prod Res Rep 2011–2012, pp 145–159

  • Shennan C, Muramoto J, Lamers J, Mazzola M, Rosskopf EN, Kokalis-Burelle N, Momma N, Butler DM, Kobara Y (2014) Anaerobic soil disinfestation for soil borne disease control in strawberry and vegetable systems: current knowledge and future directions. Acta Hort 1044:165–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinmura A (2000) Causal agent and control of root rot of Welsh onion (in Japanese). PSJ Soilborne Dis Work Rep 20:133–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinmura A (2004) Principle and effect of soil sterilization method by reducing redox potential of soil (in Japanese). PSJ Soilborne Dis Work Rep 22:2–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Subbarao KV (2002) Methyl bromide alternatives—meeting the deadlines. Phytopathology 92:1334–1336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takai Y, Kamura T (1996) The mechanism of reduction in waterlogged paddy soil. Folia Microbiol 11:304–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uematsu S, Tanaka-Miwa C, Sato R, Kobara Y, Sato M (2007) Ethyl alcohol as a promising material of reductive soil disinfestation for controlling root knot nematode and soilborne plant diseases. In: Obenauf GL (ed) Proc 2007 Ann Int Res Conf Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, pp 75.1–75.3

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. E. Suto (Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences) for the critical reading and correcting of the manuscript; Dr. Y. Kobara (National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences) and Dr. N. Momma (Japan Horticultural Production and Research Institute) for technical advice on the BSD test; Dr. Y. Tachibana and Mr. T. Kawaide (NARO Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution), Dr. T. Takai (NARO Kyushu Okinawa Agricultural Research Center), and Dr. H. Honda and Mr. K. Ohta (Tokai Resource Co.) for technical support in preparing bioethanol solutions (preparation of plant materials, management of ethanol fermentation process, and ethanol distillation). This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research C 23580466.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsuo Horita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horita, M., Kitamoto, H.K. Biological soil disinfestation using bioethanol fermentation products: role of residual organic substances. J Gen Plant Pathol 81, 304–314 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-015-0595-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-015-0595-x

Keywords

Navigation