Skip to main content
Log in

Scaling earthquake magnitude in real time with high-rate GNSS peak ground displacement from variometric approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peak ground displacement (PGD) derived from high-rate Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) can be used to determine, i.e., the estimate or scale the earthquake magnitude in real time without magnitude saturation experienced by seismic sensors at large earthquakes. Compared with relative positioning or Precise Point Positioning (PPP), the variometric approach can calculate station velocity using the broadcast ephemeris and avoiding estimating phase ambiguities. By integration, velocities can be translated into displacements. However, an inaccurate broadcast ephemeris might cause integrated displacements to show nonlinear drifts. Recently developed real-time orbit and clock products used by real-time PPP have higher accuracy and can also be employed by the variometric approach. We evaluate the performance of the variometric approach on magnitude scaling using high-rate GNSS data collected during the 2019 Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake, the 2016 Mw 7.8 New Zealand earthquake, and the 2017 Mw 6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake. The results indicate that a spatial filter cannot correct nonlinear drifts of integrated displacements completely and scaled magnitudes are not stable when the broadcast ephemeris is used. While using the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES) real-time ephemeris, we find both the spatial filter and linear filter can correct drifts well and scaled magnitudes have the same accuracy as those of PPP. While comparing different GNSS systems, we find that BDS is superior to GPS and GLONASS in the case of the Jiuzhaigou earthquake because BDS has a better satellite geometry in this region. Compared with single GPS, multi-GNSS can improve satellite geometry and provide more precise seismic displacements when broadcast ephemeris and low sampling precise clocks are used by the variometric method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

High-rate RINEX files for Ridgecrest earthquake and New Zealand earthquake can be downloaded at ftp://data-out.unavco.org/pub and ftp://geonet.org.nz. We are also very grateful to CNES (http://www.ppp-wizard.net/), CODE (ftp://igs.gnsswhu.cn/pub/gps/products/) and GFZ (ftp://cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/gps/products/mgex/) for providing real-time and final orbit and clock products.

References

  • Allen R, Ziv A (2011) Application of real-time GPS to earthquake early warning. Geophys Res Lett 38(16):L16310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti E, Branzanti M, Biagi L, Colosimo G, Mazzoni A, Crespi M (2014) Global navigation satellite systems seismology for the 2012 Mw 6.1 Emilia earthquake: exploiting the VADASE algorithm. Seismol Res Lett 85(3):649–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock Y, Melgar D, Crowell BW (2011) Real-time strong-motion broadband displacements from collocated GPS and accelerometers. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(6):2904–2925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Bommer JJ (2005) Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(2):93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branzanti M, Colosimo G, Crespi M, Mazzoni A (2013) GPS near-real-time coseismic displacements for the great Tohoku-oki earthquake. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 10(2):372–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown HM, Allen RM, Hellweg M, Khainovski O, Neuhauser D, Souf A (2011) Development of the ElarmS methodology for earthquake early warning: realtime application in California and offline testing in Japan. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31(2):188–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colosimo G, Crespi M, Mazzoni A (2011) Real-time GPS seismology with a stand-alone receiver: a preliminary feasibility demonstration. J Geophys Res 116:B11302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowell BW, Bock Y, Melgar D (2012) Real-time inversion of GPS data for finite fault modeling and rapid hazard assessment. Geophys Res Lett 39(9):L09305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowell BW, Melgar D, Bock Y, Haase JS, Geng J (2013) Earthquake magnitude scaling using seismogeodetic data. Geophys Res Lett 40(23):6089–6094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsobeiey M, Al-Harbi S (2015) Performance of real-time Precise Point Positioning using IGS real-time service. GPS Solut 20(3):565–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang R, Shi C, Song W, Wang G, Liu J (2014) Determination of earthquake magnitude using GPS displacement waveforms from real-time precise point positioning. Geophys J Int 196(1):461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fratarcangeli F, Savastano G, D’Achille M, Mazzoni A, Crespi M, Riguzzi F, Devoti R, Pietrantonio G (2018) VADASE reliability and accuracy of real-time displacement estimation: application to the Central Italy 2016 earthquakes. Remote Sens 10(8):1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge M, Chen J, Douša J, Gendt G, Wickert J (2012) A computationally efficient approach for estimating high-rate satellite clock corrections in realtime. GPS Solut 16(1):9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Bock Y, Melgar D, Crowell BW, Haase JS (2013) A new seismogeodetic approach applied to GPS and accelerometer observations of the 2012 Brawley seismic swarm: implications for earthquake early warning. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 14(7):2124–2142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng T, Xie X, Fang R, Su X, Zhao Q, Liu G, Li H, Shi C, Liu J (2016) Real-time capture of seismic waves using high-rate multi-GNSS observations: application to the 2015 Mw 7.8 Nepal earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 43(1):161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Jiang P, Liu J (2017) Integrating GPS with GLONASS for high-rate seismogeodesy. Geophys Res Lett 44(7):3139–3146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Melgar D, Bock Y (2019) Seismogeodetic P-wave amplitude: no evidence for strong determinism. Geophys Res Lett 46(20):11118–11126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graizer V (2006) Tilts in strong ground motion. Bull seism Soc Am 96(6):2090–2102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamling IJ, Hreinsdóttir S, Clark K, Elliott J, Liang C, Fielding E, Litchfield N, Villamor P, Wallace L, Wright TJ et al (2017) Complex multifault rupture during the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake, New Zealand. Science 356(6334):eaam7194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshiba M, Iwakiri K (2011) Initial 30 seconds of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake (Mw9.0)—amplitude and τc for magnitude estimation for earthquake early warning. Earth Planets Space 63(7):553–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouba J (2009) A guide to using international GNSS service (IGS) products. http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/igscb/resource/pubs/UsingIGSProductsVer21.pdf

  • Larson KM, Bodin P, Gomberg J (2003) Using 1 Hz GPS data to measure deformations caused by the Denali fault earthquake. Science 300(5624):1421–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Ge M, Zhang Y, Wang R, Guo B, Klotz J, Wickert J, Schuh H (2013) High-rate coseismic displacements from tightly-integrated processing of raw GPS and accelerometer data. Geophys J Int 195(1):612–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Zheng K, Li X, Liu G, Ge M, Wickert J, Schuh H (2019) Real-time capturing of seismic waveforms using high-rate BDS, GPS and GLONASS observations: the 2017 Mw 6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake in China. GPS Solut 23(1):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melgar D, Hayes GP (2019) Characterizing large earthquakes before rupture is complete. Sci Adv 5(5):eaav2032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melgar D, Bock Y, Sanchez D, Crowell BW (2013) On robust and reliable automated baseline corrections for strong motion seismology. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 118(3):1177–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melgar D, Crowell BW, Geng J, Allen RM, Bock Y, Riquelme S, Hill EM, Protti M, Ganas A (2015) Earthquake magnitude calculation without saturation from the scaling of peak ground displacement. Geophys Res Lett 42(13):5197–5205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melgar D, Melbourne TI, Crowell BW, Geng J, Szeliga W, Scrivner C, Santillan M, Goldberg DE (2019) Real-time high-rate GNSS displacements: performance demonstration during the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, Earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minson S, Murray JR, Langbein JO, Gomberg JS (2014) Real-time inversions for finite fault slip models and rupture geometry based on high-rate GPS data. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119(4):3201–3231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y (1988) On the urgent earthquake detection and alarm system (UrEDAS). In: Proceedings of the 9th world conference on earthquake engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, pp 673–678

  • Savastano G, Komjathy A, Shume E, Vergados P, Ravanelli M, Verkhoglyadova O, Meng X, Crespi M (2019) Advantages of geostationary satellites for ionospheric anomaly studies: ionospheric plasma depletion following a rocket launch. Remote Sens 11(14):1734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu Y, Fang R, Li M, Shi C, Li M, Liu J (2018) Very high-rate GPS for measuring dynamic seismic displacements without aliasing: performance evaluation of the variometric approach. GPS Solut 22(4):121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Kanamori H (2005) Experiment on an onsite early warning method for the Taiwan early warning system. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(1):347–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Zhao L (2006) Magnitude estimation using the first three seconds P-wave amplitude in earthquake early warning. Geophys Res Lett 33(16):L16312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu P, Shi C, Fang R, Liu J, Niu X, Zhang Q, Yanagidani T (2013) High-rate precise point positioning (PPP) to measure seismic wave motions: an experimental comparison of GPS PPP with inertial measurement units. J Geod 87(4):361–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zang J, Xu C, Chen G, Wen Q, Fan S (2019) Real-time coseismic deformations from adaptively tight integration of high-rate GNSS and strong motion records. Geophys J Int 219(3):1757–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Li X, Guo F (2011) Satellite clock estimation at 1 HZ for realtime kinematic PPP applications. GPS Solut 15(4):315–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo A, Lancieri M, Nielsen S (2006) Earthquake magnitude estimation from peak amplitudes of very early seismic signals on strong motion records. Geophys Res Lett 33(23):L23312

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the Southern California Integrated GPS Network and the Plate Boundary Observatory operated by UNAVCO for EarthScope, the New Zealand GeoNet project and its sponsors Earthquake Commission (EQC), GNS Science, and Land Information New Zealand (LINZ), the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC), and BeiDou Ground Based Augmentation Systems (BDGBAS) for providing raw GNSS observations. This work is co-supported by the National Key Research Development Program of China under Grant No. 2018YFC1503604, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants No. 41721003, No. 41574002 and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong province under Grant No. ZR2019MD005.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caijun Xu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zang, J., Xu, C. & Li, X. Scaling earthquake magnitude in real time with high-rate GNSS peak ground displacement from variometric approach. GPS Solut 24, 101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-01013-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-01013-x

Keywords

Navigation