Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of three hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching periods on the micro-tensile bond strength between two CAD–CAM ceramic systems [Vita Suprinity (VS) and feldspathic CEREC blocs (CB)] and a composite resin. The ceramics were categorized into six groups based on the surface conditioning protocol used, as follows: G1: CB-HF 5% for 20 s; G2: CB-HF 5% for 40 s; G3: CB-HF 5% for 60 s; G4: VS-HF 5% for 20 s; G5: VS-HF 5% for 40 s; G6: VS-HF 5% for 60 s. Scotchbond Universal was applied onto the pretreated ceramic surfaces and covered with Filtek Z350 XT composite resin. After 24 h, the specimens were cut into microbars (n = 16) and a micro-tensile bond strength test (μTBS) was carried out. An optical microscope was used to examine the fractured microbars. The results showed statistically significant differences between the factors tested (p < 0.01). Moreover, the mean MPa of G1(17.27), G2(13.03), G3(12.82), G4(15.83), G5(21.66), and G6(14.50) was seen to significantly differ. The predominant failure type observed was adhesive, and all three periods of HF etching produced satisfactory bonding between the composite resin and CB. An etching time of 40 s provided the highest μTBS value for VS.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10266-021-00644-x/MediaObjects/10266_2021_644_Fig1_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mörmann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F, Barbakow F. Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int. 1989;20:329–39.
Zhi L, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Comparative in vitro wear resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:199–202.
Otto, T. Up to 27-years clinical long-term results of chairside Cerec 1 CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Compt Dent. 2017; 20:315–29. http://www.quintpub.com/userhome/ijcd/ijcd_20_3_otto_p315.pdf
Traini T, Sinjari B, Pascetta R, Serafini N, Perfetti G, Trisi P, et al. The zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic: lights and shadows of a new material. Dent Mater J. 2016;35:748–55.
Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Dent Mater. 2016;32:908–14.
Sato TP, Anami LC, Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Effects of surface treatments on the bond strength between resin cement and a new zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic. Oper Dent. 2016;41:284–92.
Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:268–74.
Perdigão J, Swift EJ Jr. Universal adhesives. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27:331–4.
Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers [Internet]. J Dent Res. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300604.
Venturini AB, Prochnow C, Rambo D, Gundel A, Valandro LF. Effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration on resin adhesion to a feldspathic ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17:313–20.
Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003;19:725–31.
Swift EJ Jr, LeValley BD, Boyer DB. Evaluation of new methods for composite repair. Dent Mater. 1992;8:362–5.
Murillo-Gómez F, Palma-Dibb RG, De Goes MF. Effect of acid etching on tridimensional microstructure of etchable CAD/CAM materials. Dent Mater. 2018;34:944–55.
Akyıl MŞ, Yılmaz A, Bayındır F, Duymuş ZY. Microtensile bond strength of resin cement to a feldspathic ceramic. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011;29:197–203.
Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DCN. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:479–88.
Ramakrishnaiah R, Alkheraif AA, Divakar DD, Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. The effect of hydrofluoric acid etching duration on the surface micromorphology, roughness, and wettability of dental ceramics. Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060822.
Soares CJ, Giannini M, de Oliveira MT, Paulillo LAMS, Martins LRM. Effect of surface treatments of laboratory-fabricated composites on the microtensile bond strength to a luting resin cement. J Appl Oral Sci. 2004;12:45–50.
Emsermann I, Eggmann F, Krastl G, Weiger R, Amato J. Influence of pretreatment methods on the adhesion of composite and polymer infiltrated ceramic CAD-CAM Blocks. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21:433–43.
Hu M, Weiger R, Fischer J. Comparison of two test designs for evaluating the shear bond strength of resin composite cements [Internet]. Dent Mater. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.023.
Al-Thagafi R, Al-Zordk W, Saker S. Influence of surface conditioning protocols on reparability of CAD/CAM zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18:135–41.
Lung CYK, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater. 2012;28:467–77.
Stokes AN, Hood JAA, Tidmarsh BG. Effect of 6-month water storage on silane-treated resin/porcelain bonds [Internet]. J Dent. 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(88)90132-7.
Tokar E, Polat S, Ozturk C. Repair bond strength of composite to Er, Cr:YSGG laser irradiated zirconia and porcelain surfaces. Biomed J. 2019;42:193–9.
Kanzow P, Wiegand A, Schwendicke F, Göstemeyer G. Same, same, but different? A systematic review of protocols for restoration repair. J Dent. 2019;86:1–16.
Bertolini JC. Hydrofluoric acid: a review of toxicity. J Emerg Med. 1992;10:163–8.
Hickel R, Brüshaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations–criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater Elsevier BV. 2013;29:28–50.
El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater. 2003;19:575–83.
Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater. 1995;11:117–25.
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
da Cunha, P.F.J.S., Tavares, J.G., Spohr, A.M. et al. Examining the effects of acid etching duration on the bond strength between two CAD/CAM materials and one composite resin. Odontology 110, 113–119 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00644-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00644-x