Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Incidental colorectal FDG uptake on PET/CT scan and lesions observed during subsequent colonoscopy: a systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Incidental colorectal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake can be observed during a positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan. For clinical and/or histological assessment of the cause, a colonoscopy is then performed. A systematic review was conducted to investigate the relationship between incidental colorectal FDG uptake and lesions observed during a subsequent colonoscopy.

Methods

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science with the keywords concerning PET/CT scan and colonoscopy. The studies were selected using inclusion criteria defined a priori and were described individually to examine the correlation between incidental colorectal FDG uptake and the lesions found at colonoscopy.

Results

Twenty-six of 1606 studies found were included. In total, 108,578 patients underwent an FDG-PET/CT scan as part of a diagnostic work-up or cancer staging. In total, 2546 incidental colorectal FDG uptakes were described in 2121 patients (mean age 62.7 years SD ± 5.1), of which 2045 uptakes in 1635 patients were examined by colonoscopy, within a mean of 37 days (SD ± 28). The colonoscopic lesions included neoplasms (n = 1097; 322 cancers), benign lesions (n = 273), and inflammatory lesions (n = 71). Colonoscopies were normal in 604 patients. In total, 82% of lesions were located in the same location as the FDG uptakes. The positive predictive value was 70% (95% CI [68–72]).

Conclusions

Incidental colorectal FDG uptake, as evaluated by subsequent colonoscopy, often reveals neoplastic lesions. Predominantly, lesions were located at the same location as FDG uptake. Further investigation is warranted before recommending that incidental colorectal FDG uptake should always result in referral to diagnostic colonoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau MJ, Brown ML, Royal HD, Siegel BA et al (2006) Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med 47(5):885–895

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Şimşek FS, İspiroğlu M, Taşdemir B, Köroğlu R, Ünal K, Özercan IH et al (2015) What approach should we take for the incidental finding of increased 18F-FDG uptake foci in the colon on PET/CT? Nucl Med Commun 36(12):1195–1201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang Y-TT, Ravi Kumar AS (2012) Potential for truncating the scan length of restaging FDG-PET/CT after chemoradiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 33(5):503–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bipat S, Niekel MC, Comans EF, Nio CY, Bemelman WA, Verhoef C et al (2012) Imaging modalities for the staging of patients with colorectal cancer. Neth J Med 70(1):26–34

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aristophanous M, Yong Y, Yap JT, Killoran JH, Allen AM, Berbeco RI et al (2012) Evaluating FDG uptake changes between pre and post therapy respiratory gated PET scans. Radiother Oncol 102(3):377–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roelcke U (2012) Imaging brain tumors with PET, SPECT, and ultrasonography. Handb Clin Neurol. 104:135–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdel-Nabi H, Doerr RJ, Lamonica DM, Cronin VR, Galantowicz PJ, Carbone GM et al (1998) Staging of primary colorectal carcinomas with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose whole-body PET: correlation with histopathologic and CT findings. Radiology 206(3):755–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kamel EM, Thumshirn M, Truninger K, Schiesser M, Fried M, Padberg B et al (2004) Significance of incidental 18F-FDG accumulations in the gastrointestinal tract in PET/CT: correlation with endoscopic and histopathologic results. J Nucl Med 45(11):1804–1810

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Na S-Y, Kim K-J, Han S, Jin S, Kim J-HJS, Yang D-H et al (2015) Who should undergo a colonoscopy among patients with incidental colon uptake on PET-CT? Scand J Gastroenterol 5521(2014):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lin M, Koo JH, Abi-Hanna D (2011) Management of patients following detection of unsuspected colon lesions by PET imaging. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9(12):1025–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Treglia G, Calcagni ML, Rufini V, Leccisotti L, Meduri GM, Spitilli MG et al (2012) Clinical significance of incidental focal colorectal 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: our experience and a review of the literature. Color Dis 14(2):174–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Phys Ther 89(9):873–880

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Connor D, Green S, Higgins JP (2008) Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies. Cochrane Handb Syst Rev Interv Cochrane Book Ser 2008:81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Agress H, Cooper BZ (2004) Detection of clinically unexpected malignant and premalignant tumors with whole-body FDG PET: histopathologic comparison. Radiology 230(2):417–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chopra A, Ford A (2012) Incidental findings on positron emission tomography/CT scans performed in the investigation of lung cancer. Br J Radiol 85(July):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pandit-Taskar N, Schöder H, Gonen M, Larson SM, Yeung HWD (2004) Clinical significance of unexplained abnormal focal FDG uptake in the abdomen during whole-body PET. Am J Roentgenol 183(4):1143–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shim JH, Oh SI, Yoo HM, Jeon HM, Park CH et al (2012) Clinical significance of incidental colonic 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT images in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 16(10):1847–1853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cho SH, Kim SW, Kim WC, Park JM, Yoo IR, Kim SH et al (2013) Incidental focal colorectal 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol WJG 19(22):3453–3458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhuang H, Hickeson M, Chacko TK, Duarte PS, Nakhoda KZ, Feng Q et al (2002) Incidental detection of colon cancer by FDG positron emission tomography in patients examined for pulmonary nodules. Clin Nucl Med 27(9):628–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Drenth JPH, Nagengast FM, Oyen WJG (2001) Evaluation of (pre-)malignant colonic abnormalities: endoscopic validation of fDG-PET findings. Eur J Nucl Med 28(12):1766–1769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Farquharson AL, Chopra A, Ford A, Matthews S, Amin SN, De Noronha R (2012) Incidental focal colonic lesions found on 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan: further support for a national guideline on definitive management. Color Dis 14(2):56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fuertes J, Montagut C, Bullich S, Coma MI, Mestre-Fusco A, Suarez-Pinera M et al (2015) Incidental focal uptake in colorectal location on oncologic FDG PET and PET/CT studies: histopathological findings and clinical significances. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 34(2):95–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gutman F, Alberini JL, Wartski M, Vilain D, Le Stanc E, Sarandi F et al (2005) Incidental colonic focal lesions detected by FDG PET/CT. Am J Roentgenol 185(2):495–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hwang JP, Woo SK, Yoon SY, Jeong SY (2015) The potential usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting colorectal carcinoma and adenoma in asymptomatic adults. Ann Nucl Med 29(2):157–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Israel O, Yefremov N, Bar-Shalom R, Kagana O, Frenkel A, Keidar Z et al (2005) PET/CT detection of unexpected gastrointestinal foci of 18F-FDG uptake: incidence, localization patterns, and clinical significance. J Nucl Med 46(5):758–762

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kei PL, Vikram R, Yeung HWD, Stroehlein JR, Macapinlac HA (2010) Incidental finding of focal FDG uptake in the bowel during PET/CT: CT features and correlation with histopathologic results. Am J Roentgenol 194(5):401–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu T, Behr S, Khan S, Osterhoff R, Aparici CM (2015) Focal colonic FDG activity with PET/CT: guidelines for recommendation of colonoscopy. World J Nucl Med 14(1):25–30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Purandare NC, Gawade SK, Puranik AD, Agrawal A, Shah S, Rangarajan V (2012) Etiology and significance of incidentally detected focal colonic uptake on FDG PET/CT. Indian J Radiol Imaging 22(4):260–266

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee C, Koh SJ, Kim JW, Lee KL, Im JP, Kim SG et al (2013) Incidental colonic 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: Do we need colonoscopy for patients with focal uptake confined to the left-sided colon? Dig Dis Sci 58(1):229–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Peng J, He Y, Xu J, Sheng J, Cai S, Zhang Z (2011) Detection of incidental colorectal tumours with 18F-labelled 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans: results of a prospective study. Color Dis 13(11):374–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Roh SH, Jung S, Kim BS (2012) The clinical meaning of benign colon uptake in 18 F-FDG PET: comparison with colonoscopic findings. Clin Endosc 45(2):145–150

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Seivert M, Plomteux O, Colard A, Leclercq P, Gauthier D, Houbiers G et al (2014) Endoscopic findings in case of incidental colonic uptake in PET-CT how to improve PET-CT specificity? Acta Gastroenterol Belg 77(4):413–417

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee JC, Hartnett GF, Hughes BGM, Ravi Kumar AS (2009) The segmental distribution and clinical significance of colorectal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake incidentally detected on PET-CT. Nucl Med Commun 30(5):333–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Keyzer C, Dhaene B, Blocklet D, De Maertelaer V, Goldman S, Gevenois PA (2015) Colonoscopic findings in patients with incidental colonic focal FDG uptake. Am J Roentgenol 204(5):W586–W591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. van Hoeij FB, Keijsers RG, Loffeld BC, Dun G, Stadhouders PH, Weusten BL (2015) Incidental colonic focal FDG uptake on PET/CT: can the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) guide us in the timing of colonoscopy? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42(1):66–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Salazar Andía G, Prieto Soriano A, Ortega Candil A, Cabrera Martín MN, González Roiz C, Ortiz Zapata JJ et al (2012) Clinical relevance of incidental finding of focal uptakes in the colon during 18F-FDG PET/CT studies in oncology patients without known colorectal carcinoma and evaluation of the impact on management. Rev Española Med Nucl e Imagen Mol 31(1):15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gill RS, Perry T, Abele JT, Bédard EL, Schiller D (2012) The clinical significance of incidental intra-abdominal findings on positron emission tomography performed to investigate pulmonary nodules. World J Surg Oncol 10(1):25

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Putora PM, Müller J, Borovicka J, Plasswilm L, Schmidt F (2013) Relevance of incidental colorectal FDG-PET/CT-enhanced lesions. Onkologie 36(4):200–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tatlidil R, Jadvar H, Bading JR, Conti PS (2002) Incidental colonic fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: correlation with colonoscopic and histopathologic findings. Radiology 224(3):783–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Treglia G, Taralli S, Salsano M, Muoio B, Sadeghi R, Giovanella L (2014) Prevalence and malignancy risk of focal colorectal incidental uptake detected by (18)F-FDG-PET or PET/CT: a meta-analysis. Radiol Oncol 48(2):99–104

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hewett DG, Rex DK (2011) Miss rate of right-sided colon examination during colonoscopy defined by retroflexion: an observational study. Gastrointest Endosc 74(2):246–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Boellaard R, O’Doherty M, Weber W, Mottaghy F, Lonsdale M, Stroobants S et al (2010) FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37(1):181–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Michael Gade and Lars Jelstrup Petersen from The Department of Nuclear medicine at Aalborg University Hospital, for technical assistance regarding FDG-PET/CT scan techniques.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Clinical Cancer Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark

    S. J. Kousgaard & O. Thorlacius-Ussing

  2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    S. J. Kousgaard & O. Thorlacius-Ussing

Authors
  1. S. J. Kousgaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. Thorlacius-Ussing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. J. Kousgaard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

No specific ethics committee approval was required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not required.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 112 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kousgaard, S.J., Thorlacius-Ussing, O. Incidental colorectal FDG uptake on PET/CT scan and lesions observed during subsequent colonoscopy: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 21, 521–529 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1652-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1652-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation