Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical Significance of Incidental Colonic 18F-FDG Uptake on PET/CT Images in Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background and Objectives

We assessed the ability of positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET/CT) to detect synchronous colonic pathology and determined the significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) activity in the colon of gastric cancer patients.

Methods

A total of 239 gastric cancer patients who underwent PET/CT and colonoscopy preoperatively were included. FDG uptake patterns on PET/CT were classified as (1) group A, focal; (2) group B, diffuse; and (3) group C, no uptake. The PET/CT findings were compared with the results of concurrent colonoscopy.

Results

In group A, a total of 123 polyps of >0 mm were observed. Of these, nine polyps were colonic adenocarcinomas and six were high-grade dysplasia. The incidence of colonic adenocarcinomas was significantly higher in group A than in the other two groups (p = 0.037). There was a significant correlation between SUVmax values and incidence of colonic polyps of >10 mm (r = 0.471, p = 0.04). The distribution pattern of SUVmax in polyps with adenoma (>10 mm) was less homogenous than in polyps (>10 mm) with adenocarcinoma.

Conclusions

The focal colonic FDG uptake in PET/CT requires colonoscopic confirmation. The suspicion of colonic malignancy increased in the presence of polyps >10 mm that showed a positive correlation with the SUVmax.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P.: Global Cancer Statistics: 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55:74–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kelley JR, Duggan JM.: Gastric Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Factor. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim JP.: Surgical Results in Gastric Cancer. Semin Surg Oncol 1999; 17:132–138.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller FH, Kochman ML, Talamonti MS, et al.: Gastric Cancer. Radiologic Staging. Radiol Clin North Am 1997; 35:331–349.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Park CH, Song KY, Kim SN.: Treatment Results for Gastric Cancer Surgery: 12 Years' Experience at a Single Institute in Korea. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008; 34:36–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim SK, Kang KW, Lee JS, et al.: Assessment of Lymph Node Metastases using 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006; 33:148–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yeung HW, Macapinlac H, Karpeh M, et al.: Accuracy of FDG-PET in Gastric Cancer. Preliminary Experience. Clin Positron Imaging 1998; 1:213–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen J, Cheong JH, Yun MJ, et al.: Improvement in Preoperative Staging of Gastric Adenocarcinoma with Positron Emission Tomography. Cancer 2005; 103:2383–2390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Song KY, Park SM, Kim SN, Park CH.: The Role of Surgery in the Treatment of Recurrent Gastric Cancer. Am J Surg 2008; 196:19–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maehara Y, Hasuda S, Koga T, et al.: Postoperative Outcome and Sites of Recurrence in Patients following Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer. Br J Surg 2000; 87:353–357.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Otsuji E, Yamaguchi T, Sawai K, et al.: Recent Advances in Surgical Treatment have Improved the Survival of Patients with Gastric Carcinoma. Cancer 1998; 82:1233–1237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cook GJR, Fogelman I, Maisey MN.: Normal Physiological and Benign Pathological Variants of 18-Fluoro-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Scanning: Potential for Error in Interpretation. Semin Nucl Med 1996; 26:308–314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kostakoglu L, Hardoff R, Mirtcheva R, et al.: PET-CT Fusion Imaging in Differentiating Physiologic from Pathologic FDG Uptake. Radiographic 2004; 24:1411–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gutman F, Alberini JL, Wartski M, et al.: Incidental Colonic Focal Lesions Detected by FDG PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185:495–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kamel EM, Thumshirn M, Truninger K, et al.: Significance of Incidental 18 F-FDG Accumulation in the Gastrointestinal Tract in PET/CT: Correlation with Endoscopic and Histopathologic Results. J Nucl Med 2004; 45:1804–1810.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Israel O, Yefremov N, Bar-Shalom R, et al.: PET/CT Detection of Unexpected Gastrointestinal Foci of 18-F-FDG Uptake: Incidence, Localization Patterns, and Clinical Significance. J Nucl Med 2005; 46:758–762.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Agress H, Cooper BZ.: Detection of Clinically Unexpected Malignant and Premalignant Tumors with Whole-Body FDG-PET: Histopathology Comparison. Radiology 2004; 23:417–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Israel O, Mor M, Guralnik L, et al.: 18F-FDG PET/CT Useful for Imaging and Management of Patients with Suspected Occult Recurrence of Cancer? J Nucl Med 2004; 45:2045–2051

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim S, Chung JK, Kim BT, et al.: Relationship between Gastrointestinal F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose Accumulation and Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Whole-Body PET. Clin Positron Imaging 1999; 2:273–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weston BR, Iyer RB, Qiao W, et al.: Ability of Integrated Positron Emission and Computed Tomography to Detect Significant Colonic Pathology: The Experience of a Tertiary Cancer Center. Cancer 2010; 116:1454–1461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yasuda S, Shohtsu A, Tsutsumi Y.: Colonic adenoma detected by positron emission tomography (PET): a case report. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 1998;23:153–155.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhuang H, Hickeson M, Chacko TK, et al.: Incidental detection of colon cancer by FDG positron emission tomography in patients examined for pulmonary nodules. Clin Nucl Med 2002;27:628–632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yasuda S, Fujii H, Nakahara T, et al.: 18 F-FDG PET detection of colonic adenomas. J Nucl Med 2001;42:989–992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Kouwen MC, Nagengast FM, Jansen JB, et al.: 2-(18 F)-Fluoro-2-deoxy-dglucose positron emission tomography detects clinical relevant adenomas of the colon: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3713–3717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wong WM, Mandir N, Goodlad RA, et al.: Histogenesis of human colorectal adenomas and hyperplastic polyps: the role of cell proliferation and crypt fission. Gut. 2002;50:212-217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Smyth E, Schöder H, Strong VE, et al: A prospective evaluation of the utility of 2-deoxy-2-[(18) F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in staging locally advanced gastric cancer. Cancer. 2012; doi:10.1002/cncr.27550.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyo Young Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shim, J.H., O, J.H., Oh, S.I. et al. Clinical Significance of Incidental Colonic 18F-FDG Uptake on PET/CT Images in Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 16, 1847–1853 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1941-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1941-3

Keywords

Navigation