Abstract
This study analyses intersection configuration design elements associated with traffic-related air pollution and ranks the three most effective configurations. An assessment methodology for pedestrians PM2.5 exposure associated with crossing traffic hotspots is presented. The quantitative PM2.5 exposure concentration reduction effects of at-grade intersection design with stretched segment, pedestrian bridge and left-turn prohibition are estimated using a new US Environmental Protection Agency general emissions model: a multi-link dispersion model based on the AERMOD model. The results of the case study show that intersection design using a stretched segment has a reverse effect on pedestrian PM2.5 exposure, while the left-turn prohibition and the pedestrian bridge are environmentally friendly options with lower PM2.5 concentrations. In order of effectiveness, the intersection design types can be listed as pedestrian bridge, left-turn prohibition and stretched segment, based on the pedestrian PM2.5 exposure index. This study proposes guidelines and tools that road/intersection designers and engineers can use for quantifying environmental impacts. It also shows that design configurations have the potential to mitigate air quality impacts from traffic.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldauf RW (2011) The role of vegetation in mitigating air quality impacts from traffic emissions. EM, Pittsburgh, pp 1–4
Baldauf RW, Thoma E, Khlystov A, Isakov V, Bowker GE, Long T, Snow R (2008) Impacts of noise barriers on near-road air quality. Atmos Environ 42:7502–7507
Baldauf RW, Bailey C, Cook JR, Cahill TA, Khlystov A, Zhang KM, Cowherd C, Bowker GE (2009) Can roadway design be used to mitigate air quality impacts from traffic?. EM, Pittsburgh, p 6
Baldauf RW, Heist D, Isakov V, Perry S, Hagler GSW, Kimbrough S, Shores R, Black K, Brixey L (2013) Air quality variability near a highway in a complex urban environment. Atmos Environ 64:169–178
Chen H, Bai S, Eisinger D, Niemeier D, Claggett M (2009) Predicting near-road PM2.5 concentrations comparative assessment of CALINE4, CAL3QHC, and AERMOD. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 2123:26–37
Chen X, Li T, Yan Z (2013) Fine particle emission characteristics of light-duty gasoline vehicle on urban streets. J Jiangsu Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 34:254–260
Cimorelli AJ, Perry SG, Venkatram A, Weil JC, Paine RJ, Wilson RB, Lee RF, Peters WD, Brode RW (2005) AERMOD: a dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part I: general model formulation and boundary layer characterization. J Appl Meteorol 44:682–693
Fitzpatrick K, Wooldridge MD, Blaschke JD (2005) Urban intersection design guide. Research Report No. FHWA/TX-05/0-4365-P2
Guo WW, Wang WH, Wets G, Wang D, Mao Y, Jiang XB, Guo HW (2011) Influence of stretching-segment storage length on urban traffic flow in signalized intersection. Int J Comput Intell Syst 4:1401–1406
Hagler GS, Tang W, Freeman MJ, Heist DK, Perry SG, Vette AF (2011) Model evaluation of roadside barrier impact on near-road air pollution. Atmos Environ 45:2522–2530
Hartley WS, Carr EL, Bailey CR (2006) Modeling hotspot transportation-related air quality impacts using ISC, AERMOD, and HYROAD. Proceedings of air & waste management association specialty conference on air quality models. Air and Waste Management Association, Denver, pp 236–237
Heal MR, Kumar P, Harrison RM (2012) Particles, air quality, policy and health. Chem Soc Rev 41:6606–6630
Heist DK, Perry SG, Brixey LA (2009) A wind tunnel study of the effect of roadway configurations on the dispersion of traffic-related pollution. Atmos Environ 43:5101–5111
Ishaque MM, Noland RB (2008) Simulated pedestrian travel and exposure to vehicle emissions. Transp Res Part D 13:27–46
Kumar P, Morawska L, Birmili W, Paasonen P, Hu M, Kulmala M, Harrison RM, Norford L, Britter R (2014) Ultrafine particles in cities. Environ Int 66:1–10
Lioy PJ (1990) Assessing total human exposure to contaminants. Environ Sci Technol 24:938–945
Mohammadnejad M, Ghazvini M, Mahlia TMI (2014) Fuel economy standards for light duty vehicles and their potential to aid Iran toward achieving fuel saving and emissions reduction. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16:661–666
Myunghoon K, Dominique L, Josias Z (2012) Environmentally conscious highway design for crest vertical curves. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 2270:96–106
Nesamani KS, Subramanian KP (2006) Impact of real-world driving characteristics on vehicular emissions. JSME Int J Ser B 49(1):19–26
Perry SG, Cimorelli AJ, Paine RJ, Brode RW, Weil JC, Venkatram A, Wilson RB, Lee RF, Peters WD (2005) AERMOD: a dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part II: model performance against 17 field study databases. J Appl Meteorol 44:694–708
Pierson WR, Gertler AW, Robinson NF, Sagebiel JC, Zielinska B, Bishop GA, Stedman DH, Zweidinger RB, Ray WD (1996) Real-world automotive emission-summary of studies in the Fort McHenry and Tuscarora Mountain Tunnels. Atmos Environ 30:2233–2256
Qiu ZW, Peng XH (2015) Investigating the impact of urban grade-separation on pedestrian PM2.5 exposure. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-015-0909-x
Resitoglu IA, Altinisik K, Keskin A (2015) The pollutant emissions from diesel-engine vehicles and exhaust aftertreatment systems. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:15–27
Sharma N, Chaudhry KK, Chalapatirao CV (2004) Vehicular pollution prediction modeling: a review of highway dispersion models. Transp Rev 24:409–435
Soulhac L, Garbero V, Salizzoni P, Mejean P, Perkins RJ (2009) Flow and dispersion in street intersections. Atmos Environ 43:2981–2996
Steffens JT, Wang YJ, Zhang KM (2012) Exploration of effects of a vegetation barrier on particle size distributions in a near-road environment. Atmos Environ 50:120–128
USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1995) User’s guide for the ISC3 dispersion models. Report EPA-454-B-95-003a, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2004). User’s Guide for AERMOD. Report EPA-454-B-03-001, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2009) National emission inventory air pollutant emission trends data; US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. See http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/trends/index.html. Accessed Mar 2015
USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2010) Transportation conformity guidance for quantitative hot-spot analyses in PM2.5 and PM10 nonattainment and maintenance areas. Report EPA-420-B-10-1040, Office of Transportation and Air Quality
USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2012) Motor vehicle emission simulator (MOVES) User Guide for MOVES 2010b. Report EPA-420-B-12-001b, Office of Transportation and Air Quality
Vallamsundar S, Lin J (2011) MOVES Versus MOBILE comparison of greenhouse gas and criterion pollutant emissions. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 2233:27–35
Wang D, Guo W, Song X, Lu T (2010) Optimization of stretching-segment design and signal timing in traffic control. Control Theory Appl 27:1598–1604
Xin AY, Panos D (2013) Left-turn prohibition and partial grade separation for signalized intersections: planning-level assessment. J Transp Eng 139:399–406
Yassin MF, Ohba M (2013) Effect of street geometrical layout on dispersion emissions of traffic exhaust: experimental simulation. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15:167–177
Zhang KM, Gao HO (2009) Development of advanced modeling tools for hotpot analysis of transportation emissions. Final report to University Transportation Research Center
Zou B, Wilson JG, Zhan FB, Zeng Y (2009) Air pollution exposure assessment methods utilized in epidemiological studies. J Environ Monit 11:475–490
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (0009-2014G1221022), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (No. 2013M532006) and Shaanxi Province Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qiu, Z., Li, X. At-grade intersection configuration influences on pedestrian exposure to PM2.5 . Clean Techn Environ Policy 17, 2323–2335 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0975-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0975-0