Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Benton visual form discrimination test in healthy children: normative data and qualitative analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The attention evaluation may be considered a crucial phase in neuropsychological assessment. It must take into account the systemic nature of the attentional functions and must use different reliable tests in relation to the neurological and attentional problems to be addressed. The aim of the study was to offer the clinician an effective tool for attention assessment and provide the normative data and performance analysis on the Benton Visual Form Discrimination Test on an Italian sample (number 323) of healthy school children, from ages 5 to 11. Performance on Visual Form Discrimination Test (VFDT) significantly increased with growing age. Performances were significantly different when the test was divided into four sets. All groups, especially the younger ones, showed some difficulty in maintenance and sustained attention. The correct answers were significantly more numerous when they were placed at the top quadrants. This effect was more marked in the younger groups. Sex was never a significantly influencing performance. Our data seem to indicate that the higher attentional frontoparietal network becomes more functionally organized around 9–10 years. VFDT appears as a discriminative task. In clinical practice, our normative data can be used both on complex visual attention skill evaluation in children and on the ability to maintain visual attention in time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gitelman DR, Nobre AC, Meyer JR, Parrish TB, Callahan C, Russell EJ, Mesulam MM (1996) Functional magnetic resonance imaging of covert spatial attention. Human Brain 3:S180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(96)80182-0

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nobre AC, Coull JT, Mesulam MM, Frith CD (1997) The neural system for directing spatial and temporal attention compared with PET. Soc Neurosci Abstr 23:300

    Google Scholar 

  3. Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(3):201–215 Review

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fortenbaugh FC, DeGutis J, Esterman M (2017) Recent theoretical, neural, and clinical advances in sustained attention research. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1396(1):70–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13318 Review

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mesulam MM (2000) Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology, Oxford University Press

  6. Oliveri M, Zhaoping L, Mangano GR, Turriziani P, Smirni D, Cipolotti L (2010) Facilitation of bottom-up feature detection following rTMS-interference of the right parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia 48(4):1003–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mangano GR, Oliveri M, Turriziani P, Smirni D, Zhaoping L, Cipolotti L (2014) Impairments in top down attentional processes in right parietal patients: paradoxical functional facilitation in visual search. Vis Res 97:74–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mangano GR, Oliveri M, Turriziani P, Smirni D, Zhaoping L, Cipolotti L (2015) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left parietal cortex facilitates visual search for a letter among its mirror images. Neuropsychologia 70:196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alkonyi B, Juhász C, Muzik O, Behen ME, Jeong JW, Chugani HT (2011) Thalamocortical connectivity in healthy children: asymmetries and robust developmental changes between ages 8 and 17 years. Am J Neuroradiol 32(5):962–969. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gogtay N, Giedd JN, Lusk L, Hayashi KM, Greenstein D, Vaituzis AC, Nugent IIITF, Herman DH, Clasen LS, Toga AW, Rapoport JL, Thompson PM (2004) Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. PNAS 101(21):8174–8179. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402680101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Sayed E, Larsson JO, Persson H, Santosh P, Rydelius PA (2003) “Maturational lag” hypothesis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: an update. Acta Paediatr 92:776–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb02531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Manly T, Robertson IH (2004) The rehabilitation of attentional deficits. In: Halligan P, Kischka U, Marshall JC (eds) Handbook of clinical neuropsychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 89–107

    Google Scholar 

  13. Benton AL, Hamsher K, Varney NR, Spreen O (1983) Contributions to neuropsychological assessment: a clinical manual. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benton AL, Sivan AB, Hamsher K, Varney NR, Spreen O (1994) Contributions to neuropsychological assessment: a clinical manual, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lopez MN, Charter RA, Oh S, Lazar MD, Imperio SM (2005) Psychometric properties of the Benton Visual Form Discrimination Test. Appl Neuropsychol 12(1):19–23. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324826an1201_4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lockwood CA, Mansoor Y, Homer-Smith E, Moses JA Jr (2011) Factor structure of the Benton visual retention tests: dimensionalization of the Benton visual retention test, Benton visual retention test—multiple choice, and the visual form discrimination test. Clin Neuropsychol 25(1):90–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Turriziani P, Oliveri M, Bonnì S, Koch G, Smirni D, Cipolotti L (2009) Exploring the relationship between semantics and space. PLoS One 4(4):e5319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005319

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitrushina MN, Boone KB, Razani J, D’Elia LF (2005) Handbook of normative data for neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 241–277

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nabors NA, Vangel SJ, Lichtenberg PA (1996) Visual form discrimination test with elderly medical inpatients. Clin Gerontol 17(1):43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaskie B, Storandt M (1995) Visuospatial deficit in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Arch Neurol 52:422–425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mendez MF, Mendex MA, Martin R, Smyth KA, Whitehouse PJ (1990) Complex visual disturbances in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 40:439–443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang C, Liu Y (1993) Impairment of visual form discrimination in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Psychol Sin 25:258–263

    Google Scholar 

  23. Iverson GL, Woodward TS, Smith-Seemiller L (2000) Internal consistency and concurrent validity of two short forms of the Visual Form Discrimination Test. Appl Neuropsychol 7:108–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilde MC, Boake C, Sherer M (2000) Wechsler adult intelligence scale–revised block design broken configuration errors in nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury. Appl Neuropsychol 7:208–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Malina A, Regan T, Bowers D, Millis S (2001) Psychometric analysis of the visual form discrimination test. Percept Mot Skills 92:449–455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Campo P, Morales M (2003) Reliability and normative data for the Benton visual form discrimination test. Clin Neuropsychol 17(2):220–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kasai M, Ishizaki J, Ishii H, Yamaguchi S, Yamadori A, Meguro K (2009) Normative data on Benton Visual Form Discrimination Test for older adults and impaired scores in Clinical Dementia Rating 0.5 participants: community-based study. The Osaki-Tajiri Project. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 63(1):9–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Caplan B, Schultheis MT (1998) An interpretive table for the visual form discrimination test. Percept Mot Skills 87:1203–1207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kempen JH, Kritchevsky M, Feldmen S (1994) Effect of visual impairment on neuropsychological test performance. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 16:223–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bobele RM (1975) Children’s norms for the visual retention test: multiple choice form I. Doctoral dissertation, University of Houston

  31. Woods AJ, Göksun T, Chatterjee A, Zelonis S, Mehta A, Smith SE (2013) The development of organized visual search. Acta Psychol 143(2):191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Trick LM, Enns JT (1998) Lifespan changes in attention: the visual search task. Cogn Dev 13(3):369–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(98)90016-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Taylor MJ, Chevalier H, Lobaugh NJ (2003) Discrimination of single features and conjunctions by children. Int J Psychophysiol 51(1):85–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Merrill EC, Lookadoo R (2004) Selective search for conjunctively defined targets by children and young adults. J Exp Child Psychol 89:72–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Luria AR (1980) Higher cortical functions in man. Basic Books, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Benton AL, Hamsher KD, Stone BF (1977) Visual retention test: multiple choice form 1: administration F: visual form discrimination, administration G: multiple choice-memory. Division of Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, University Hospitals, Iowa City

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stuss DT, Benson DF (1984) Neuropsychological studies of the frontal lobes. Psychol Bull 95(1):3–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lezak MD (2004) Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press: USA

  39. Raven JC (1995) Coloured progressive matrices sets A, Ab, B. Manual Sections 1 & 2. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze Psicologiche, Pedagogiche e della Formazione, Università degli Studi di Palermo, viale delle Scienze, Ed.15, 90128, Palermo, Italy

    Daniela Smirni, Massimiliano Oliveri & Patrizia Turriziani

  2. NeuroTeam Life and Science, Palermo, Italy

    Daniela Smirni, Massimiliano Oliveri & Patrizia Turriziani

  3. Servizio di Psicologia, A.S.P., Ragusa, Italy

    Giovanni Di Martino

  4. Dipartimento di Scienze della Formazione, Università degli Studi di Catania, Catania, Italy

    Pietro Smirni

Authors
  1. Daniela Smirni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Massimiliano Oliveri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patrizia Turriziani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giovanni Di Martino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pietro Smirni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Smirni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smirni, D., Oliveri, M., Turriziani, P. et al. Benton visual form discrimination test in healthy children: normative data and qualitative analysis. Neurol Sci 39, 885–892 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-018-3297-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-018-3297-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation