Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dose tapering of biologic agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis—results from a cohort study in Germany

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the association of demographic and clinical factors with the clinical decision of tapering biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in daily practice.

Methods

All RA patients receiving bDMARDs were documented by 14 rheumatologists when presenting in 9 specialized private practices. Statistical analyses employed multivariable logistic models for dose reduction with the covariates age, gender, disease duration until bDMARD start, smoking status, disease activity, comorbidity, functional capacity, radiographic damage, concomitant methotrexate (MTX) treatment, rheumatoid factor positivity, and glucocorticoid use. In the multivariable model (MVM), missing values were imputed.

Results

Data of 586 RA patients on bDMARD treatment were available, 171 of which (29%) received a reduced dose. The highest rates of patients with dose reduction were seen for rituximab (67%) and infliximab (50%). The degree of dose reduction was most prominent for rituximab (57%). In the MVM, 6/11 covariates were significantly associated with dose reduction: age (odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.05; P = 0.002), time between disease onset and bDMARD start (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.06; P = 0.015), DAS 28 < 2.6 (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.01–2.37; P = 0.045), MTX therapy (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.03–2.25; P = 0.036), comorbidity (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.01–1.42; P = 0.036), and glucocorticoid dose (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76–0.89; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

DAS 28 remission, concomitant MTX, and lower glucocorticoid doses were positively associated with dose tapering of bDMARDs in RA patients. While this could be expected, the reason for the association with age, comorbidity, and the time between disease onset and bDMARD start is less clear.

Key points

• In rheumatology practice, tapering of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs is feasible in nearly 30% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

• The degree of dose reduction may exceed 50% of the recommended dose.

• In a multivariable model, concomitant methotrexate is positively associated with dose tapering of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Additional data will be available on request.

References

  1. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Bijlsma J et al (2017) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis 76:960–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fiehn C, Holle J, Iking-Konert C et al (2018) S2e guideline: treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying drugs. Z Rheumatol 77:35–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh JA, Cameron C, Noorbaloochi S et al (2015) Risk of serious infection in biological treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 386:258–265

  4. Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR et al (2016) Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 75:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haschka J, Englbrecht M, Hueber AJ et al (2016) Relapse rates in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in stable remission tapering or stopping antirheumatic therapy: interim results from the prospective randomised controlled RETRO study. Ann Rheum Dis 75:45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smolen JS, Nash P, Durez P et al (2013) Maintenance, reduction, or withdrawal of etanercept after treatment with etanercept and methotrexate in patients with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (PRESERVE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 381:918–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smolen JS, Szumski A, Koenig AS, Jones TV, Marshall L (2018) Predictors of remission with etanercept-methotrexate induction therapy and loss of remission with etanercept maintenance, reduction, or withdrawal in moderately active rheumatoid arthritis: results of the PRESERVE trial. Arthritis Res Ther. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1484-9

  8. Henaux S, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Cantagrel A et al (2018) Risk of losing remission, low disease activity or radiographic progression in case of bDMARD discontinuation or tapering in rheumatoid arthritis: systematic analysis of the literature and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 77:515–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schett G, Emery P, Tanaka Y, Burmester G, Pisetsky DS, Naredo E, Fautrel B, van Vollenhoven R (2016) Tapering biologic and conventional DMARD therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: current evidence and future directions. Ann Rheum Dis 75:1428–1437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Verhoef LM, van den Bemt BJ, van der Maas A, Vriezekolk JE, Hulscher ME, van den Hoogen FH, Jacobs WC, van Herwaarden N, den Broeder AA (2019) Down-titration and discontinuation strategies of tumour necrosis factor-blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low disease activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24;5:CD010455. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010455.pub3

  11. Fransen J, Stucki G, van Riel PL (2003) Rheumatoid arthritis measures: disease activity score (DAS), disease activity score-28 (DAS28), rapid assessment of disease activity in rheumatology (RADAR), and rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index (RADAI). Arthritis Care Res 49(S5):S214–S224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zochling J, Stucki G, Grill E, Braun J (2007) A comparative study of patient-reported functional outcomes in acute rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 34:64–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. England BR, Sayles H, Mikuls TR et al (2015) Validation of the rheumatic disease comorbidity index. Arthritis Care Res 67:865–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. van Vollenhoven RF, Ostergaard M, Leirisalo-Repo M et al (2016) Full dose, reduced dose or discontinuation of etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 75:52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Maas A, Kievit W, van den Bemt BJ et al (2012) Down-titration and discontinuation of infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients with stable low disease activity and stable treatment: an observational cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 71:1849–1854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van Herwaarden N, van der Maas A, Minten MJM et al (2015) Disease activity guided dose reduction and withdrawal of adalimumab or etanercept compared with usual care in rheumatoid arthritis: open label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. BMJ 350:h1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lau CS, Gibofsky A, Damjanov N et al (2017) Down-titration of biologics for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. Rheumatol Int 37:1789–1798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang M, Ren F, Zheng Y et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of down-titration versus continuation strategies of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with low disease activity or in remission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 35:152–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Edwards CJ, Fautrel B, Schulze-Koops H, Huizinga TWJ, Kruger K (2017) Dosing down with biologic therapies: a systematic review and clinicians’ perspective. Rheumatology 56:1847–1856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Komiya T, Minegishi-Takase K, Sakurai N et al (2017) Predictive factors associated with successful down-titration of biologics for rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical practice [abstract 827]. Arthritis Rheumatol 69(suppl 10)

  21. Dierckx S, Lauwerys BR, Sokolova T et al (2018) Tapering of biological antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis patients is achievable and cost effective in daily clinical practice: DATA from the Brussels UCL RA cohort [abstract 625]. Arthritis Rheumatol 70(suppl 10)

  22. Valor L, Garrido J, Martínez-Estupiñán L et al (2018) Identifying markers of sustained remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients on long-term tapered biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Rheumatol Int 38:1465–1470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanaka Y, Smolen JS, Jones H, Szumski A, Marshall L, Emery P (2019) The effect of deep or sustained remission on maintenance of remission after dose reduction or withdrawal of etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 21:164. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1937-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamanaka H, Nagaoka S, Lee SK et al (2016) Discontinuation of etanercept after achievement of sustained remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who initially had moderate disease activity-results from the ENCOURAGE study, a prospective, international, multicenter randomized study. Mod Rheumatol 26:651–661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL Jr et al (2016) 2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 68:1–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Martínez-Feito A, Plasencia-Rodríguez C, Navarro-Compán V et al (2019) The effect of methotrexate versus other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on serum drug levels and clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Clin Rheumatol 38:949–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brahe CH, Krabbe S, Østergaard M et al (2019) Dose tapering and discontinuation of biological therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients in routine care - 2-year outcomes and predictors. Rheumatology 58:110–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef S et al (2016) Optimizing therapy in inflammatory arthritis: prediction of relapse after tapering or stopping treatment for rheumatoid arthritis patients achieving clinical and radiological remission. Clin Rheumatol 35:2915–2923

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the participating patients and the members of the WILDWEST-group: Sabine Arndt, Claas Fendler, Georg Hübner, Ludwig Kalthoff, Hans Jürgen Menne, Bernhard Mintrop, Annette Rittstieg, Ulrich Schoo, Frank Schumann, and Rakesh Sharma.

Funding

This study was supported by an unrestricted grant by Pfizer (Grant number WI 186174, Pfizer GmbH, Linkstr. 10, D-10785 Berlin, Germany).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ES, DK, XB, and JB conceived the study idea and designed the study. DK, ES, and CK reviewed the literature. HR and DK directed the analyses, which were carried out by HR. All authors participated in the discussion and interpretation of the results. CK organized the writing and wrote the initial drafts. All authors critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dietmar Krause.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

None.

Ethics approval

The ethics committee of Munster, Germany, had approved the study (registration number: 2018–208-f-S).

Consent to participate

Each patient had provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

All authors provided consent to publish.

Code availability

The software application will be available on request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krause, D., Krause, C., Rudolf, H. et al. Dose tapering of biologic agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis—results from a cohort study in Germany. Clin Rheumatol 40, 887–893 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05316-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05316-9

Keywords

Navigation