Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the risk degree of goafs by employing hybrid TODIM method under uncertainty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A large number of accidents caused by goafs have great influence on the ecological environment and public safety. In order to assess the risk degrees of goafs, a hybrid Tomada de Decisão Interativa Multicritério (TODIM) method is proposed in this paper. Firstly, on account of the geological conditions, shape parameters and environmental factors, an evaluation index system is established. This system includes seven quantitative sub-criteria and six qualitative sub-criteria. The combined weight of each index is determined on the basis of game theory by combining the subjective weight and objective weight. Afterward, a fuzzy-TODIM method is put forward to obtain the rank of risk degree and the specific risk level. Finally, the hybrid TODIM method is used to assess the risk degrees of goafs in Shuikoushan lead-zinc mine under uncertainty. Sensitivity analysis is demonstrated to reveal the robustness of this approach. Results show that the proposed hybrid TODIM method can be adopted to assess the risk degrees of goafs reliably and stably.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali SH, Giurco D, Arndt N, Nickless E, Brown G, Demetriades A, Durrheim R, Enriquez MA, Kinnaird J, Littleboy A, Meinert LD, Oberhänsli R, Salem J, Schodde R, Schneider G, Vidal O, Yakovleva N (2017) Mineral supply for sustainable development requires resource governance. Nature 543(7645):367–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badri A, Nadeau S, Gbodossou A (2013) A new practical approach to risk management for underground mining project in Quebec. J Loss Prevent Proc 26(6):1145–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Can E, Kuscu S, Mekik C (2012) Determination of underground mining induced displacements using GPS observations in Zonguldak-Kozlu hard Coal Basin. Int J Coal Geol 89:62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SH, Hsieh CH (2000) Representation, ranking, distance, and similarity of LR type fuzzy number and application. Austr J Intell Proc Syst 6(4):217–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SJ, Yin DW, Cao FW, Liu Y, Ren KQ (2016) An overview of integrated surface subsidence-reducing technology in mining areas of China. Nat Hazards 81(2):1129–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daw G (2017) Security of mineral resources: a new framework for quantitative assessment of criticality. Resour Policy 53:173–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deck O, Al Heib M, Homand F (2003) Taking the soil–structure interaction into account in assessing the loading of a structure in a mining subsidence area. Eng Struct 25(4):435–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djamaluddin I, Mitani Y, Esaki T (2011) Evaluation of ground movement and damage to structures from Chinese coal mining using a new GIS coupling model. Int J Rock Mech Min 48(3):380–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong LJ, Shu WW, Li XB, Zhou ZL, Gong FQ, Liu XL (2017) Quantitative evaluation and case study of risk degree for underground goafs with multiple indexes considering uncertain factors in mines. Geofluids. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3271246

  • Du K, Li XB, Liu KW, Zhao XX, Zhou ZL, Dong LJ (2011) Comprehensive evaluation of underground goaf risk and engineering application [J]. J Cent South Univ (Sci Tech) 42(9):2802–2801 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes LFAM, Lima MMPP (1992) TODIM: basics and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 16(4):113–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong FQ, Li XB, Dong LJ, Liu XL (2008) Underground goaf risk evaluation based on uncertainty measurement theory. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 27(2):323–330 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanus MA (2007) Occupational health and safety in mining-status, new developments, and concerns. J S Afr I Min Metall 107(8):531–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu JH, Shang JL, Zhou KP, Chen YK, Ning YL, Liu L, Aliyu MM (2015) Hazard degree identification of goafs based on scale effect of structure by RS-TOPSIS method. J Cent South Univ 22:684–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu YX, Li XB (2012) Bayes discriminant analysis method to identify risky of complicated goaf in mines and its application. T Nonferr Metal Soc 22(2):425–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang MJ (2011) Research and practice of mining circular economy in Kailin group. Min Tech 11(3):130–131 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang WQ, Shang J (2015) Multi-criteria group decision making with fuzzy data: an extension of the VIKOR method. J Syst Eng Electron 26(4):764–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Qin JX, Li JJ, Hou Q (2016) The accident early warning system for iron and steel enterprises based on combination weighting and Grey prediction model GM (1, 1). Safety Sci 89:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang WZ, Zhao GY, Hong CS (2018) Selecting the optimal mining method with extended multi-objective optimization by ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form (MULTIMOORA) approach. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3405-5

  • Liang WZ, Zhao GY, Wu H (2017) Evaluating investment risks of metallic mines using an extended topsis method with linguistic neutrosophic numbers. Symmetry 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9080149

  • Luo SZ, Cheng PF, Wang JQ, Huang YJ (2017) Selecting project delivery systems based on simplified neutrosophic linguistic preference relations. Symmetry 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9080151

  • Ma HT, Wang JN, Wang YH (2012) Study on mechanics and domino effect of large-scale goaf cave-in. Safety Sci 50(4):689–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passos AC, Teixeira MG, Garcia KC, Cardoso AM, Gomes LFAM (2014) Using the TODIM-FSE method as a decision-making support methodology for oil spill response. Comput Oper Res 42:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostamzadeh R, Govindan K, Esmaeili A, Sabaghi M (2015) Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices. Ecol Indic 49:188–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun YH, Zhang XD, Mao WF, Xu LN (2015) Mechanism and stability evaluation of goaf ground subsidence in the third mining area in gong Changling District, China. Arab J Geosci 8(2):639–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang J, Meng FY (2017) A consistency-based method to decision making with triangular fuzzy multiplicative preference relations. Int J Fuzzy Syst 19(5):1317–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Sina Hebei net (2012) Thousands of collapse pits occurred in the Hulun Buir prairie. http://hebei.sina.com.cn/news/shwx/2012-09-13/14468398.html

  • The state council work safety committee office (SCWSCO) (2016) The governance work program of goafs hidden accident in metal and non-metal underground mines. http://www.chinasafety.gov.cn/newpage/Contents/Channel_21356/2016/0712/272621/content_272621.htm

  • Tosun Ö, Akyüz G (2015) A fuzzy TODIM approach for the supplier selection problem. Int J Pattern Recogn 8(2):317–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng ML, Lin YH, Tan K, Chen RH, Chen YH (2014) Using TODIM to evaluate green supply chain practices under uncertainty. Appl Math Model 38(11):2983–2995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang F, Li H (2015) Novel method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making based on TODIM method. J Syst Eng Electron 26(5):1023–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Ding D, Liu O, Li M (2016a) A synthetic method for knowledge management performance evaluation based on triangular fuzzy number and group support systems. Appl Soft Comput 39:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JA, Shang XC, Ma HT (2008) Investigation of catastrophic ground collapse in Xingtai gypsum mines in China. Int J Rock Mech Min 45(8):1480–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang QX, Wang H, Qi ZQ (2016b) An application of nonlinear fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in safety evaluation of coal mine. Safety Sci 86:78–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM (1997) Using the method of maximizing deviations to make decision for multi-indicies. J Syst Eng Electron 8:21–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei GW (2011) Grey relational analysis model for dynamic hybrid multiple attribute decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 24(5):672–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood BJ, von Blanckenburg F, Ross NL, Rosso JJ (2017) Mineral resources and the limits to growth. Elements 13(5):291–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu QH, Peng ZB, Chen KP, Peng WX, Chen LQ (2010) Synthetic judgment on two-stage fuzzy of stability of mine gob area. J Cent South Univ (Sci Tech) 41(2):661–667 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inform Contr 8(3):338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Jin JL, Zhu JZ, Xu JC, Hang QF, Chen YQ, Han DG (2016) Water resources risk assessment model based on the subjective and objective combination weighting methods. Water Resour Manag 30(9):3027–3042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JS, You XY, Liu HC, Wu SM (2017) An extended VIKOR method using intuitionistic fuzzy sets and combination weights for supplier selection. Symmetry 9(9):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9090169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Li XB, Mitri HS, Wang SM, Wei W (2013) Identification of large-scale goaf instability in underground mine using particle swarm optimization and support vector machine. Int J Min Sci Tech 23(5):701–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zindani D, Maity SR, Bhowmik S, Chakraborty S (2017) A material selection approach using the TODIM (TOmada de Decisao Interativa Multicriterio) method and its analysis. Int J Mater Res 108(5):345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Fundamental Research Funds of Central South University (2018zzts218), Survey Research Funds of Central South University (2018dcyj052), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (51374244, 51774321). Besides, we also sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive suggestions and the editors for their careful and patient work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Wei-zhang Liang and Guo-yan Zhao conceived and worked together to achieve this work, Wei-zhang Liang wrote the paper, and Guo-yan Zhao made contribution to the case study. Hao Wu and Ying Chen made contribution to modify the quality and English writing of this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoyan Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, W., Zhao, G., Wu, H. et al. Assessing the risk degree of goafs by employing hybrid TODIM method under uncertainty. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 3767–3782 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1340-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1340-4

Keywords

Navigation