Abstract
Currently, one of the biggest challenges in microbial and ecosystem ecology is to develop conceptual models that organize the growing body of information on environmental microbiology into a clear mechanistic framework with a direct link to ecosystem processes. Doing so will enable development of testable hypotheses to better direct future research and increase understanding of key constraints on biogeochemical networks. Although the understanding of phenotypic and genotypic diversity of microorganisms in the environment is rapidly accumulating, how controls on microbial physiology ultimately affect biogeochemical fluxes remains poorly understood. We propose that insight into constraints on biogeochemical cycles can be achieved by a more rigorous evaluation of microbial community biomass composition within the context of ecological stoichiometry. Multiple recent studies have pointed to microbial biomass stoichiometry as an important determinant of when microorganisms retain or recycle mineral nutrients. We identify the relevant cellular components that most likely drive changes in microbial biomass stoichiometry by defining a conceptual model rooted in ecological stoichiometry. More importantly, we show how X-ray microanalysis (XRMA), nanoscale secondary ion mass spectroscopy (NanoSIMS), Raman microspectroscopy, and in situ hybridization techniques (for example, FISH) can be applied in concert to allow for direct empirical evaluation of the proposed conceptual framework. This approach links an important piece of the ecological literature, ecological stoichiometry, with the molecular front of the microbial revolution, in an attempt to provide new insight into how microbial physiology could constrain ecosystem processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Biogeochemical cycles are intimately linked with microbial communities from local to global spatial scales and on daily to geologic timescales in all ecosystems (Falkowski and others 2008). Our understanding of the composition and biology of environmental microorganisms is accumulating at an unprecedented rate due to the application of an ever-increasing suite of culture-free methods (Zak and others 2007). Whereas these advances have increased the understanding of microbial structure and function in the environment, microbially focused ecological theory (that is, synthetic frameworks within which to organize this wealth of information) has not kept pace with the accumulation of empirical results (Prosser and others 2007). Recently, theoretical approaches have yielded insight into how environmental microorganisms are distributed in time and space (Hughes Martiny and others 2006). Such theoretical or conceptual frameworks are required to direct hypothesis-driven research and to develop a clearer understanding of how microorganisms constrain ecosystem processes.
We argue that a more rigorous application of ecological stoichiometry to microbial ecology can provide novel insight into how microorganisms constrain ecosystem processes. Ecological stoichiometry is an increasingly broad body of work that evaluates how the relative quantity of specific elements constrains or facilitates the movement of organic and inorganic matter through an ecosystem (Sterner and Elser 2002). Using a stoichiometric approach to integrate biological and ecological systems across wide physical scales (for example, from microorganisms to ecosystems) has several inherent advantages. For example, elemental ratios are unitless and therefore allow tracking of the same response at scales where quantities differ greatly (for example, from single cells to landscapes). In addition, although rate processes may be heavily influenced by temperature and precipitation in some ecosystems, focusing on the relative changes in individual elements (for example, increasing litter N:C) corrects for temporal differences and allows for direct comparison of processes under a wide range of climatic conditions (Manzoni and others 2008). Also, using stoichiometry as an organizational framework places explicit focus on the law of conservation of mass, which allows for ‘truthing’ of empirical data by conducting mass balances. Unbalanced analyses can point to previously unconsidered sources or sinks of elements into a biogeochemical cycle. These points, coupled with the dominance both metabolically and often by mass of microorganisms in many ecosystems (Whitman and others 1998), emphasize the strength and importance of using ecological stoichiometry to link microbial and ecosystem processes in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.
Traditionally, stoichiometric analyses have been focused on trophic interactions between metazoans and autotrophs (for example, zooplankton and algae, Sterner and Elser 2002). More recently, the power of combining traditional food web models with stoichiometric theory has been proposed (Hall and others 2009). It has been long known that Bacteria and Archaea provide an essential link between dissolved organic matter and higher trophic levels (Azam and others 1983). However, food web models routinely exclude the microbial component or deal with it only in passing, usually due to inability to quantify many of the necessary parameters associated with the microbial component of the food web. In this mini-review we take a single trophic-level view of nutrient recycling, however, it is important to note that the methods and concepts presented here also allow for the integration, both conceptually and empirically, of microorganisms into stoichiometrically specific whole food web models. Specifically, we outline a conceptual framework and a suite of complementary empirical methods that allow for deconstruction of microbial community stoichiometry to mechanistically understand what determines community biomass stoichiometry and how microorganisms may constrain nutrient cycling (Figure 1). We show how microbial biomass stoichiometry is linked to retention or recycling of mineral nutrients and how individual phylogenetic units (for example, populations, clades, domains) combine to form community stoichiometry. We then discuss how macromolecular composition influences cellular stoichiometry and how to empirically link macromolecular composition, cellular stoichiometry, and microbial community structure. Connecting these components of microbial communities links phylogenetically specific microbial physiology to community biomass stoichiometry, bringing together a well-developed body of ecological theory with the molecular front of the microbial revolution.
The Relationship Between Microbial Biomass Stoichiometry and Nutrient Cycling
In his seminal paper, Redfield (1958) identified the similarity between the carbon (C) to nitrogen (N) to phosphorus (P) ratio in marine algae and that of the dissolved resource pool. Although this work is well known, the key conclusion, that the biomass stoichiometry of marine algae regulates inorganic resource pool stoichiometry, is often overlooked. Since the publication of Redfield’s work, the metabolic dominance of marine ecosystems by Bacteria and Archaea has come to light (Strom 2008) suggesting that additional insight into marine nutrient cycles may be achieved by extending stoichiometric analyses to heterotrophic microorganisms.
This idea is supported by the recent recognition of the relationship between microbial biomass stoichiometry and nutrient recycling across a wide range of freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Using data compiled across continental-scale watersheds, Taylor and Townsend (2010) noted a consistent inverse and non-linear relationship between nitrate (NO3 −) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) levels. They concluded that the inflection point (that is, where NO3 − accumulates at low DOC levels) was strongly related to the biomass N:C of the microbial community (Taylor and Townsend 2010). Similar meta-analyses that focused on litter decomposition also pointed to microbial biomass stoichiometry as an important driver in elemental cycles. For instance, an impressively large data set (60 globally distributed locations, 55 litter types, 2,800 observations) on terrestrial litter decomposition showed that microbial community function switched between immobilization and mineralization of N when the stoichiometry of the litter approached the stoichiometry of the microbial biomass (Manzoni and others 2008). This result is consistent with an earlier study that also suggested, although in a less mechanistic manner, that decomposer physiology was an important constraint on N-release during litter decomposition (Parton and others 2007).
A similar relationship between microbial biomass stoichiometry and the proportion of nutrients consumed or recycled to the environment has also been observed in freshwater ecosystems, both lentic and lotic. In an analysis of 10 stream ecosystems from three biomes, N-uptake increased with increasing N:C of different compartments of organic matter, both biotic and abiotic (Dodds and others 2004). Although this study contained no compartments composed exclusively of microbes, differences in N:C of these pools, many with associated microbial biomass (for example, epilithon), were inversely related to N-uptake. Compartmental N:C ratio alone could predict approximately 40% of the variation in N-retention for a given reach of stream (Dodds and others 2004).
The relationship between nutrient recycling and microbial biomass stoichiometry can be especially insightful when the drivers of microbial stoichiometry are independent of the resource stoichiometry. For example, in a survey of temperate lakes (n = 47), after considering several predictor variables (chlorophyll a, total dissolved nitrogen, Secchi depth, soluble reactive phosphorus, and DOC), latitude (interpreted as a proxy for mean annual temperature) and in situ temperature were the only significant predictors of bacterial biomass P:C (Hall and others 2009). Here, by only focusing on these two significant predictor variables, we were able to extend this analysis to include 46 additional lakes from the same study, for a total of 93 lakes. The entire data set used here includes lakes from a wide trophic gradient (chlorophyll a 0.32–91, median 4.2 μg l−1) in the Upper Mid-West (South Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, and Michigan) as described by Hall and others (2009). We found latitude was again a significant predictor of bacterial biomass P:C (by atom), explaining 25% of the variance of bacterial biomass P:C (P:C = −5.8 + 0.0009 * latitude, R 2 = 0.25, P < 0.0001). More importantly, although total dissolved phosphorus (TDP) was significantly and positively correlated with biomass P:C (Figure 2A), SRP was significantly and negatively correlated with biomass P:C (Figure 2B). The inverse relationship between SRP and biomass P:C suggests that microbial biomass P:C was, in part, driving the availability of reactive P in these temperate lake ecosystems (Figure 2B). This result is consistent with the relationship between microbial biomass stoichiometry and nutrient recycling from the soil, litter, and stream studies outlined above.
There is further evidence for the relationship between microbial biomass stoichiometry and nutrient recycling from experimental studies at both the community and population level. For instance, bacteria from a Canadian shield lake showed an inverse correlation between N-flux and biomass N:P (Elser and others 1995). Specifically, when bacterial biomass N:P (by atoms) was greater than about 25, no N was recycled to the environment although below a biomass N:P of 25 there was a positive N-flux. Similarly, a chemostat study using a monoculture of Pseudomonas fluorescens also demonstrated recycling of N below a biomass N:P of 25 but not above (Chrzanowski and Kyle 1996).
Taken together, these observational and experimental studies, from an exceptionally broad range of environments, suggest that there is an intimate link between microbial biomass stoichiometry and nutrient recycling. In addition, the results from the lake survey demonstrate how bacterial biomass stoichiometry may be driven, or at least constrained, by factors other than resource stoichiometry (for example, temperature) and therefore allows for predictive linkages between environmental variables and the role of microbes in nutrient recycling. Mechanistically defining the controls and constraints on microbial biomass stoichiometry should help predict under which environmental conditions the microbial biomass pool is likely to act as a sink or source of mineral nutrients.
Theoretical Basis for Biomass Stoichiometry and Nutrient Cycling
The relationship between biomass X:C (where X can be N or P) and the amount of resource recycled to the environment has a well-developed theoretical framework with broad empirical support (Elser and Urabe 1999; Sterner 1990). Using a model system of a metazoan feeding on algae, Sterner (1990) showed that for a given resource N:P, consumers with higher biomass N:P recycled less N relative to P (Figure 3). Assuming homeostatic biomass (that is, some level of resistance to change of consumer biomass stoichiometry in response to changing resource stoichiometry) of the consumer (or in this case microbial community) when the resource N:P is less than the consumer N:P, the consumer will retain more N relative to P. Conversely, when the resource N:P is greater than the consumer N:P, the consumer recycles more N relative to P. This leads to substantially different recycling of N relative to P when communities with distinct biomass N:P ratios are exposed to an intermediate N:P resource (Figure 3). Although the presence of a ‘consumer driven nutrient recycling’ (CDNR) mechanism was established using pelagic herbivore—autotroph interactions, recent studies have shown a similar mechanism in microorganisms consuming both dissolved and particulate organic matter. A theoretical analysis demonstrated that through a CDNR-like recycling mechanism, terrestrial microorganisms can be more important than herbivores in determining the nutrient that limits autotrophic growth (Cherif and Loreau 2009). Due to the low amount of primary production that is consumed by herbivores in forest ecosystems, the role of a microbially driven recycling mechanism was hypothesized to be especially pronounced and promote P limitation due to relatively high biomass P in microbial decomposers (Cherif and Loreau 2009). Shifts in the limiting nutrient caused by differential retention and recycling by microorganisms due to differences in biomass stoichiometry can result in shifts in autotrophic community composition driving changes in ecosystem processes (for example, C acquisition) (Cherif and Loreau 2009). This mechanism was demonstrated empirically where the inclusion of a bacterial community switched nutrient limitation in an algal culture from N to P limitation (Danger and others 2007).
The suite of studies discussed above, from the ecosystem (Taylor and Townsend 2010; Manzoni and others 2008; Hall and others 2009; Dodds and others 2004), community (Danger and others 2007; Elser and others 1995) and organismal level (Chrzanowski and Kyle 1996; Danger and others 2007) suggest that CDNR is applicable to microorganisms from many if not all environments. However, this interpretation as well as the CDNR mechanism itself hinge on the assumption that biomass of the microbial consumer is homeostatic. Although it is clear that microorganisms are not strictly homeostatic (Makino and Cotner 2003), multiple studies suggest some level of biomass homeostasis is present in microorganisms at multiple phylogenetic levels (Cleveland and Liptzin 2007; Danger and others 2008; Makino and Cotner 2004).
The Homeostasis of Microbial Biomass
The few studies that have directly evaluated the variation in bacterial biomass stoichiometry in response to changing resource stoichiometry have found different levels of homeostasis for different elemental ratios (for example, N:C vs. P:C) and for different levels of ecological organization, for example, population versus community (Chrzanowski and Kyle 1996; Goldman and others 1987; Makino and others 2003; Tezuka 1990). Microbial community biomass N:C both in the environment (Cleveland and Liptzin 2007) and in enrichment culture (Goldman and others 1987) appears to be relatively homeostatic, especially when considered in the context of the wide range of N:C of the potential resource pool (Cleveland and Liptzin 2007). Microbial biomass P:C, however, is considerably more variable and individual strains (that is, populations) appear to demonstrate a higher level of homeostasis than communities (Danger and others 2008; Makino and others 2003). The latter result has led to the hypothesis that community homeostasis might be a function of biological diversity, with more diverse communities having a lower level of stoichiometric homeostasis (Makino and others 2003). In such a scenario, changes in the community biomass P:C are due to shifts in the relative abundance of the more homeostatic constituent populations. Taxon-specific differences in biomass stoichiometry would suggest that biomass stoichiometry (or level of plasticity in biomass stoichiometry) is, to some extent, a genotypic trait or, more likely, that natural selection is acting on one or multiple genotypic trait(s) whose combined effect result in a constrained cellular stoichiometry. Such a relationship can be elucidated by noting that variance in cellular stoichiometry is ultimately due to shifts in the relative abundance of constituent macromolecules (Hall and others 2010b), and the elemental composition of those macromolecules (Baudouin-Cornu and others 2001), which are tightly coupled to cellular physiology and life history (Vrede and others 2004). Viewing microbial community stoichiometry from this perspective links phylogenetically specific physiology and life history with biomass stoichiometry, and therefore community composition with community biomass stoichiometry.
Deconstructing Microbial Community Stoichiometry
Although community stoichiometry is a composite of population-level stoichiometry, population stoichiometry is directly attributable to the cellular stoichiometry of members of each population. Similarly, the stoichiometry of an individual cell is the composite of the relative abundance of its constituent macromolecules, each of which has a relatively fixed stoichiometric signal (Figure 4; Elser and others 1996). Changes in biomass stoichiometry, driven by changes in macromolecular composition, reflect an organism’s physiology (for example, growth rate or accumulation of storage compounds), the in situ environmental conditions (for example, resource stoichiometry, temperature), evolutionary history (Baudouin-Cornu and others 2004) or some combination of these. Thus, understanding biomass stoichiometry can give additional information on an organism’s life history and ecology. For example, positive relationships between rRNA content, biomass P:C and growth rate have been formalized as the growth rate hypothesis, GRH (Elser and others 2000) and have been shown to hold for a wide range of organisms (Elser and others 2003). Growth rate has been shown to be a major determinant of microbial biomass stoichiometry of single species (Makino and others 2003) and mixed communities (Makino and Cotner 2004) grown in culture. However, GRH relationships do not hold under non-P limitation (Makino and Cotner 2004) or pulsed resource supply (Binder and Liu 1998). A recent theoretical study demonstrated that the deviation from GRH relationships in bacteria can be explained by the optimization of the relative abundance of cellular machinery (for example, proteins, RNA) to maximize growth in environments with different resource stoichiometries (Franklin and others in press). The model was able to show mechanistically why GRH relationships would be expected under P limitation but not under N limitation. This last result illustrates the value of being able to deconstruct biomass stoichiometry into its constituent macromolecules to understand the underlying mechanisms behind such important ecological relationships as the coupling of resource availability and growth.
The GRH provides one example of a well-developed illustration of the link between constituent macromolecules, physiology, and biomass stoichiometry. Deconstructing whole organism stoichiometry into additional constituent macromolecules should allow for better understanding of the interaction between microbial physiology and biomass stoichiometry. For example, there exists a clear relationship between C storage as poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (PHB), potentially a significant component of total biomass C, and survivorship of soil bacteria under carbon limitation (Ratcliff and others 2008). The lipid content of aquatic bacteria has been shown to be taxon specific (Nichols and others 1993), closely related to the level of thermal adaptation or acclimation (Nichols and others 1997 and can be a significant pool of cellular P in marine bacteria (Van Mooy and others 2009). This has led to differences in resource availability affecting the composition of lipids in marine bacteria (Van Mooy and others 2009), which have been shown experimentally to affect the ability of bacteria to acclimate to temperature changes (Hall and others 2010a). Substitutions of elements under nutrient limitation have also been proposed to occur at the level of the proteome. Analysis of the sulfur (S) and C assimilatory pathways in a model bacterium and eukaryote revealed depletion of S and C in each pathway relative to the total proteome and to the enzymes involved in the other pathway (C or S assimilation, respectively) for both organisms (Baudouin-Cornu and others 2001). Furthermore, synthesis of extra-cellular enzymes, an essential phenotype of most soil microorganisms, requires significant amounts of C and N, influencing an organism’s resource partitioning and ultimately its biomass stoichiometry.
Each of these examples illustrates how an organism’s ecology and function are linked to the relative abundance of constituent macromolecules and their atomic composition that ultimately determines cellular biomass stoichiometry. Previously, evaluation of stoichiometric theory for microorganisms has been empirically elusive due to technological constraints. However, recent application of single-cell methods to microbial ecology allows empirical analysis of important stoichiometric parameters (described above) at a level of resolution previously unobtainable.
Empirical Analysis of Microbial Stoichiometry
To date, most of the studies on bacterial stoichiometry in the environment are observational (Tezuka 1990; Cleveland and Liptzin 2007; Hall and others 2009), focused at the community level and incorporate none of the molecular tools now available to microbial ecologists (Figure 1, above the dotted line). Experimental studies, although instructive (for example, Vrede and others 2002; Makino and others 2003; Makino and Cotner 2004), are limited to the small fraction of environmental organisms that can be cultured. Each of these limitations is primarily due to two key methodological constraints. First, it is difficult to separate microorganisms from the complex abiotic matrix they inhabit (for example, soils or sediments) or from other organisms (for example, algae, microzooplankton) to independently analyze their biomass composition. Second, traditional analytical methods require relatively large amounts of biomass to analyze the elemental and macromolecular composition of microbial biomass. Therefore, using traditional methods it is necessary either to enrich organisms in culture or for environmental samples to analyze undifferentiated bulk communities. Fortunately, both of these problems can be largely avoided by employing a series of methods that allow for analysis of elemental and macromolecular composition at the level of a single-cell.
X-ray microanalysis (XRMA) allows for elemental analysis of single bacterial cells (Norland and others 1995). For XRMA, cells are first visually detected using a transmission electron microscope (TEM) then selected for analysis of elemental content. The quantity of virtually any element of interest (lower limit = atomic number ≥ 5 with heavier elements being easier to detect), can then be determined for the entire cell based on the X-ray emission spectra. Direct visualization allows for exclusion of abiotic particles and extra-cellular polymeric substances that might otherwise bias the elemental biomass signal. XRMA has been used to successfully evaluate the elemental composition of different bacterial isolates during different growth phases and under different nutrient limitations (Vrede and others 2002) and from both cultured and environmental samples (Fagerbakke and others 1996).
A second highly versatile approach to analyze elemental composition of microbial cells is secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). Here a high-energy primary ion beam is used to expel secondary particles, neutral or charged, from the sample surface. Charged particles of one polarity are then collected by an electric field and focused, and the resulting secondary ion beam is analyzed by mass spectrometry. Recently, ion microscopy based on SIMS has found numerous applications in microbial ecology as it combines the quantification and visualization of elements and isotopes in microorganisms (Wagner 2009). NanoSIMS imaging devices offer elemental analysis at a spatial resolution between 50 and 150 nm and have been used to successfully identify and analyze individual cells from artificial and natural communities (Behrens and others 2008). In this manuscript we focus on the movement of C, N, and P between abiotic and microbial biomass pools. However, it is important to note that both XRMA and NanoSIMS have the potential to evaluate a suite of biogeochemically relevant elements (Wackett and others 2004) and thus can be used to evaluate the role of microbes in a wide range of biogeochemical cycles.
Complementary to elemental analysis of individual cells with XRMA and NanoSIMS is analysis of macromolecular composition using Raman microspectroscopy (MS). Although not new in medical microbiology (Maquelin and others 2002), Raman MS analysis has only recently been applied to environmental bacterial communities (Huang and others 2007a). In Raman MS incident monochromatic radiation (that is, laser light) interacts with molecules in the target cell. Based on the types of bonds present in certain macromolecules, pronounced peaks in the complex Raman MS spectra can be assigned to major compound classes such as proteins, carbohydrates, nucleic acids, and lipids (Schuster and others 2000). The intensity (peak height) of Raman MS bands is proportional to the concentration of the respective molecule. Therefore, because the identified macromolecule classes comprise the major pools of cellular C, N, and P (Elser and others 1996), shifts in macromolecular composition as determined by Raman MS correlate well with whole cell stoichiometry (Hall and others 2010b). Macromolecular signals as determined by Raman MS have been successfully applied to identify which resources plant associated bacteria utilized in plantae (Huang and others 2007b) as well as to differentiate the growth phase of the cells in heterogeneous populations (Hall and others 2010b).
It is important to note that these methods can produce abundant data of complex spectra that ecologists may be unaccustomed to. For example, a single Raman MS spectrum (that is, from a single-cell) may contain around 1200 data points, the peak height at each Raman MS band. There are examples of various computationally intensive approaches to deal with the data from the entire Raman spectrum (for example, see Wagner 2009 and references therein for examples). However, we found that extraction of about 15 identified peaks from complete spectra and analysis with traditional multivariate statistics (that is, principal components and canonical discriminant analyses) yielded powerful and ecologically relevant output (Hall and others 2010b). With respect to the ideas discussed in this manuscript, this subset of 15 peak heights accounted for a large proportion of variance in biomass N:C and P:C (up to 90 and 50%, respectively) suggesting that most proteins, nucleic acids, and carbohydrates were accounted for by this limited subset of spectral data. Taken together these approaches (XRMA, NanoSIMS, and Raman MS) to quantify cellular composition, both elemental and macromolecular, significantly increase the level of resolution of stoichiometric analyses in microbial ecology.
Although the elemental analysis of microbial biomass relative to the stoichiometry of the resource pool may indicate the direction of nutrient cycling (for example, whether N is likely to be retained in microbial biomass or recycled to the environment), it does not address the rate at which the biogeochemical process of interest occurs. This can be partially addressed by applying stable isotope studies in concert with NanoSIMS or Raman MS analysis. In addition to the ability to analyze biomass composition, both NanoSIMS and Raman provide the opportunity to track the incorporation of stable isotopes (for example, from labeled substrates) to regions of microbial cells (NanoSIMS) or to specific macromolecules (Raman MS). For example, using NanoSIMS the incorporation of stable isotope labeled substrates into single cells can be visualized and quantified at the sub-cellular level (Behrens and others 2008). Such analyses with NanoSIMS can be conducted at a sensitivity approximately 1000× higher than that achieved by microautoradiography for detecting labeled carbon (Lechene and others 2006). Similarly, Raman MS can identify the incorporation of stable isotope labeled compounds into macromolecules by observing the shifts in the Raman spectra of defined peaks (Huang and others 2007a). Thus, this approach links elemental analysis with NanoSIMS and macromolecular analysis with Raman MS to the rate of use of specific substrates in situ. Furthermore, the tracking of labeled substrates combined with the methods described below allows for identification of the active members of the community. This helps to reduce the complexity of the microbial community by focusing the analyses on the members of the community that are most likely to be influencing biogeochemical processes.
In addition to these analytical capabilities, each of the aforementioned single-cell methods can be combined with in situ hybridization (for example, fluorescent in situ hybridization, FISH) thus linking analysis of biomass composition to specific phylogenetic units within a microbial community. FISH with rRNA-targeted probes can be applied at multiple phylogenetic resolutions (Amann and others 1995) and can target functional genes (Pernthaler and Amann 2004; Wagner and others 1998). FISH also has a long list of successful syntheses with other analytical methods that increase the breadth of its applicability (Wagner and others 2003). For example, FISH has been successfully coupled with Raman MS (Huang and others 2007a). More recently, rRNA-targeted in situ hybridization was combined with NanoSIMS by labeling phylogenetic groups with halogenated rRNA probes (SIMSISH; Li and others 2008). Another approach uses rRNA probes linked to halogen-containing fluorochromes, effectively combining signal amplification with labeling for both fluorescence microscopy and NanoSIMS, EL-FISH (Behrens and others 2008). This allows application of in situ hybridization techniques to cells with limited ribosome count, traditionally a drawback to FISH analyses, by amplifying the signal (in this case a halogen label). Because XRMA can detect a wide range of elements, and sensitivity increases with molecular weight, EL-FISH and SIMSISH with the heavier halogens (for example, Br or I) should be applicable to XRMA analysis, although this has yet to be tested. Using these methods, the ability to scale phylogenetic information from single species to the level of genera, phyla and whole domains can be coupled to the evaluation of elemental and macromolecular composition, and activity.
The combination of these empirical techniques allows for empirical validation of the conceptual framework outlined in this manuscript, as well as the testing of many of the extant stoichiometric mechanisms developed for larger organisms but previously empirically elusive for microorganisms. Furthermore, the application of stable isotope labeling with Raman-FISH, SIMSISH, and EL-FISH provides a bridge between community structure, microbial function, and elemental and macromolecular composition in the context of ecological stoichiometry.
Challenges to Single-Cell Stoichiometric Analyses
Although single-cell analyses have several advantages, one key disadvantage is that natural microbial communities are composed of too many cells to evaluate each one independently. Therefore, it is not possible (or necessarily desirable) to independently analyze the elemental and macromolecular composition of all cells in a natural microbial assemblage. Rather, the approach outlined here is best suited for hypotheses focused on specific biogeochemical pathways and/or specific phylogenetic groups within the microbial community. For example, an a priori survey of the microbial community, such as a deep sequencing of the rRNA amplicon from community DNA, or transcriptomic and/or proteomic analysis, are ways to identify groups that are most likely to be the dominant members of the community and therefore responsible for key biogeochemical processes. After community analysis, microbial groups of interest can be targeted with designated probes and their role (for example, whether they are acting as a sink or source of mineral nutrient) in nutrient cycling more clearly defined following the conceptual framework outlined here. In addition, a pre-sorting of ‘populations’ may aid in covering the heterogeneity present in any given microbial community. For example, it is possible to subject a mixed community to cell sorting by cell size or fluorescence signal after incubation with a FISH probe using flow cytometry before subsequent stoichiometric analyses with the methods discussed here. It is also possible to use an activity stain, such as cyanoditolyl tetrazolium chloride (CTC), to aid in focusing these analyses on the active portion of the community.
A separate disadvantage to focusing only on elemental ratios is the loss of information on chemical diversity, especially organic carbon compounds, present in the environment. This is especially relevant when dealing with terrigenous organic matter where the presence of complex structural compounds and secondary metabolites are much more prevalent than in organic matter produced autochthonously in aquatic ecosystems. For example, although glucose and lignin have similar elemental composition, they also have vastly different biological lability owing to the differences in their molecular structure. This deficiency can be partly addressed using Raman MS, which gives more detailed information on the molecular composition of organisms than elemental analysis alone. For example, PHB has a well-defined peak in the Raman spectra (De Gelder and others 2008) and is a common carbohydrate reserve found in mycorrhizal symbionts (Ratcliff and others 2008). In this example, Raman MS gives information not only on the contribution of the constituent macromolecule to total biomass C but also specific information on the nature of the chemical compound that drives that signal. Although Raman does not provide a comprehensive approach to describing the chemical diversity of microbial cells or their environment, it does provide more information than elemental analysis alone.
Overview and Future Directions
The coupling of ecological theory with culture-free microbiological methods is an essential step in understanding how microorganisms affect ecosystem processes. Observational studies linking microbial community composition and ecosystem processes result in only spatially and temporally limited understanding of environmental processes and their controlling factors. Therefore, it is important to organize the abundance of information on environmental microorganisms now available into clear mechanistic frameworks that are directly related to ecosystem function. The presence of environmental controls on microbial stoichiometry (for example, temperature, Hall and others 2009), and stoichiometric thresholds that govern microbial nutrient recycling (for example, Taylor and Townsend 2010; Elser and others 1995) suggests that understanding the drivers of microbial biomass stoichiometry is one way to increase the ability to predict whether microbes act as a sink or a source of limiting nutrients in a wide variety of ecosystems. We conclude with two specific examples of how the concepts and methods discussed in this manuscript could be applied to elucidate the influence of microorganisms on ecosystem processes.
Although the genetic diversity of natural microbial communities is exceptionally high recent research points to ecological sorting of microbial taxa at relatively coarse levels of phylogenetic resolution (Phillippot and others 2010). This includes differences in the relative abundance of broad phylogenetic groups among habitats and across environmental gradients. Recently, the relationship between biomass stoichiometry and carbon use efficiency of bacteria and fungi was shown to correspond to the distribution of bacterial:fungal ratios across a terrestrial resource gradient (Keiblinger and others 2010). By coupling NanoSIMS or XRMA with in situ hybridization similar analyses can now be extended to virtually any phylogenetic group of interest. For example, the relative abundance of the Gammaproteobacteria and the Firmicutes has been shown to vary between cropland, hayed pasture, grazed pasture, and forest soil (Phillippot and others 2010). By coupling XRMA or NanoSIMS with rRNA probes (in situ hybridization) it is now possible to evaluate whether differences in the relative abundance of these groups is linked to differences in their biomass stoichiometry and if their resource demands correlate with their resource environment. Further analysis using Raman MS and in situ hybridization could determine the driver of these hypothesized differences in biomass stoichiometry between groups. These approaches may explain differences in the relative abundance of various microbial groups in time and space. More importantly, comparison of the biomass stoichiometry of each group with the resource stoichiometry of each environment would allow insight into how different microbial groups are likely affecting nutrient recycling in a given environment.
Similarly, surveys of aquatic bacterial community composition indicate that the Betaproteobacteria compose a significant proportion of freshwater bacterial communities but are virtually absent from marine habitats (Zwart and others 2002). A recent analysis of bacterial stoichiometry from a wide range of aquatic ecosystems concluded that lake bacteria were depleted in N and P relative to their marine counterparts (Cotner and others 2010). These two studies taken together suggest that the Betaproteobacteria may have a generally low nutrient content compared to other bacterial classes. This idea could be tested by targeting the Betaproteobacteria with in situ hybridization and simultaneously analyzing biomass composition (XRMA) and macromolecular composition (Raman MS) relative to other members of the bacterioplankton community. This same approach could also be extended to evaluate the seasonal cycles of microbial community structure that have been noted in a wide range of aquatic habitats (Crump and Hobbie 2005; Shade and others 2007; Hullar and others 2006; Fuhrman and others 2006). Changes in the abundance of specific microbial groups between seasons may alter community stoichiometry due to differences in their group-specific biomass stoichiometry. If so this would suggest a seasonally variable role for the microbial community in nutrient recycling. Taken together these methods and concepts provide yet another set of important tools to unravel the complex interaction between microorganisms and their environment.
References
Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer K-H. 1995. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev 59:143–69.
Azam F, Fenchel T, Field JG, Gray JS, Meyer-Reil LA, Thingstad TF. 1983. The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 10:257–63.
Baudouin-Cornu P, Surdin-Kerjan Y, Marliere P, Thomas D. 2001. Molecular evolution of protein atomic composition. Science 293:297–300.
Baudouin-Cornu P, Schuerer K, Marlière P, Thomas D. 2004. Intimate evolution of proteins: proteome atomic content correlates with genome base composition. J Biol Chem 279:5421–8.
Behrens S, Losekann T, Pett-Ridge J, Weber PK, Ng W-O, Stevenson BS, Hutchinson ID, Relman DA, Spormann AM. 2008. Linking microbial physiology to metabolic activity at the single-cell level by using enhanced element labeling-catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization (EL-FISH) and NanoSIMS. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:3143–50.
Binder BJ, Liu YC. 1998. Growth rate regulation of rRNA content of a marine Synechococcus (Cyanobacterium) strain. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3346–51.
Cherif M, Loreau M. 2009. When microbes and consumers determine the limiting nutrient of autotrophs: a theoretical analysis. Proc R Soc Biol 276:487–97.
Chrzanowski TH, Kyle M. 1996. Ratios of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in Pseudomonas fluorescens as a model for bacterial element ratios and nutrient regeneration. Aquat Microb Ecol 10:115–22.
Cleveland CC, Liptzin D. 2007. C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry 85:235–52.
Cotner JB, Hall EK, Scott JT, Heldal M. 2010. Freshwater bacteria are stoichiometrically flexible with a nutreint composition similar to seston. Front Aquat Microbiol 1. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2010.00132.
Crump BC, Hobbie JE. 2005. Synchrony and seasonality in bacterioplankton communities of two temperate rivers. Limnol Oceanogr 50:1718–29.
Danger M, Oumarou C, Benest D, Lacroix G. 2007. Bacteria can control stoichiometry and nutrient limitation of phytoplankton. Funct Ecol 21:202–10.
Danger M, Daufresne T, Lucas F, Pissard S, Lacroix G. 2008. Does Liebig’s law of the minimum scale up from species to communities. Oikos 117:1741–51.
De Gelder J, Willemse-Rix D, Scholtes MJ, Sanchez JI, Maquelln K, Vandenabeele P, De Boever P, Puppels GJ, Moens L, De Vos P. 2008. Monitoring poly(3-hydroxydutyrate) production in Cupriavidus necator DSM 428 (H16) with Raman Spectroscopy. Anal Chem 80:2155–60.
Dodds WK, Marti E, Tank JL, Pontius J, Hamilton SK, Grimm NB, Bowden WB, McDowell WH, Peterson BJ, Valett HM, Webster JR, Gregory S. 2004. Carbon and nitrogen stoichiometry and nitrogen cycling rates in streams. Oecologia 140:458–67.
Elser JJ, Urabe J. 1999. The stoichiometry of consumer-driven nutrient recycling: theory, observations and consequences. Ecology 80:735–51.
Elser JJ, Chrzanowski TH, Sterner RW, Schampel JH, Foster DK. 1995. Elemental ratios and the uptake and release of nutrients by phytoplantkon and bacteria in three lakes of the Canadian Shield. Microb Ecol 29:145–62.
Elser JJ, Dobberfuhl DR, Mackay NA, Schampel JH. 1996. Organism size, life history, and N:P stoichiometry. Bioscience 46:674–84.
Elser JJ, Sterner RW, Gorokhova E, Fagan WF, Markow TA, Cotner JB, Harrison JF, Hobbie SE, Odell GM, Weider LJ. 2000. Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems. Ecol Lett 3:540–50.
Elser JJ, Acharya K, Kyle M, Cotner JB, Makino W, Markow TA, Watts T, Hobbie S, Fagan WF, Schade J, Hood JM, Sterner RW. 2003. Growth rate-stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota. Ecol Lett 6:936–43.
Fagerbakke KM, Heldal M, Norland S. 1996. Content of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur and phosphorus in native aquatic and cultured bacteria. Aquat Microb Ecol 10:15–27.
Falkowski PG, Fenchel T, Delong EF. 2008. The microbial engines that drive earth’s biogeochemical cycles. Science 320:1034–8.
Franklin O, Hall EK, Kaiser C, Richter A, Battin T. Optimization of biomass composition explains microbial growth–stoichiometry relationships. Am Nat (in press).
Fuhrman JA, Hewson I, Schwalbach MS, Steele JA, Brown MV, Naeem S. 2006. Annually reoccurring bacterial communities are predictable from ocean conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:13104–9.
Goldman JC, Caron DA, Dennett MR. 1987. Regulation of gross growth efficiency and ammonium regeneration in bacteria by substrate C:N ratio. Limnol Oceanogr 32:1239–52.
Hall EK, Dzialowski AR, Stoxen SM, Cotner JB. 2009. The effect of temperature on the coupling between phosphorus and growth in lacustrine bacterioplankton communities. Limnol Oceanogr 54:880–9.
Hall EK, Singer GA, Kainz MJ, Lennon JT. 2010a. Evidence for a temperature acclimation mechanism in bacteria: an empirical test of a membrane-mediated trade-off. Funct Ecol 24:898–908.
Hall EK, Singer GA, Poelzl M, Schwarz C, Haemmerle I, Maixner F, Daims H, Battin T. 2010b. Looking inside the box: using Raman microspectroscopy to deconstruct biomass stoichiometry one cell at a time. ISME J. doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.115.
Huang WE, Stoecker K, Griffiths R, Newbold L, Daims H, Whiteley AS, Wagner M. 2007a. Raman-FISH: combining stable-isotope Raman spectroscopy and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the single cell analysis of identity and function. Environ Microbiol 9:1878–89.
Huang WE, Bailey MJ, Thompson IP, Whiteley AS, Spirs AJ. 2007b. Single-cell Raman spectral profiles of Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 reflects in vitro and in planta metabolic history. Microb Ecol 53:414–25.
Hughes Martiny JB, Bohannan BJM, Brown JH, Colwell RK, Fuhrman JA, Green JL, Horner-Devine MC, Kane M, Adams Krumins J, Kuske CR, Morin PJ, Naeem S, Ovreas L, Reysenbach A-L, Smith VH, Staley JT. 2006. Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:102–12.
Hullar MAJ, Kaplan LA, Stahl DA. 2006. Recurring seasonal dynamics of microbial communities in stream habitats. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:713–22.
Keiblinger KM, Hall EK, Szukics U, Haemmerle I, Ellersdorfer G, Sterflinger K, Wanek W, Richter A, Jandl R, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S. 2010. The effect of resource quantity and resource stoichiometry on microbial carbon use efficiency. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:430–40.
Lechene C, Hillion F, McMahon G, Benson D, Kleinfeld AM, Kampf JP, Distel D, Luyten Y, Bonventre J, Hentschel D, Park KM, Ito S, Schwartz M, Benichou G, Slodzian G. 2006. High-resolution quantitative imaging of mammalian and bacterial cells using stable isotope mass spectrometry. J Biol 5:20.
Li T, Wu T, Mazeas L, Toffin L, Gerquin-Kern JL, Leblon G, Bouchez T. 2008. Simultaneous analysis of microbial identity and function using NanoSIMS. Environ Microbiol 10:580–8.
Makino W, Cotner JB. 2003. C:N:P stoichiometry of a heterotrophic bacterial community in a freshwater lake: implications for resource and growth-dependent variations. Aquat Microb Ecol 34:33–41.
Makino W, Cotner JB. 2004. Elemental stoichiometry of a heterotrophic bacterial community in a freshwater lake: implications for growth and resource dependent variations. Aquat Microb Ecol 34:33–41.
Makino W, Cotner JB, Sterner RW, Elser JJ. 2003. Are bacteria more like plants or animals? Growth rate and resource dependence of bacterial C:N:P stoichiometry. Funct Ecol 17:121–30.
Manzoni S, Jackson RB, Trofymow JA, Porporato A. 2008. The global stoichiometry of litter nitrogen mineralization. Science 321:684.
Maquelin K, Kirschner C, Choo-Smith LP, van den Braak N, Endtz HP, Naumann D, Puppels GJ. 2002. Identification of medically relevant microorganisms by vibrational spectroscopy. J Microbiol Methods 51:255–71.
Nichols DS, Nichols PD, McMeekin TA. 1993. Polyunsaturated fatty acids in antarctic bacteria. Antarct Sci 5:149–60.
Nichols DS, Brown JL, Nichols PD, McMeekin TA. 1997. Production of eicosapentaenoic and arachidonic acids by an antarctic bacterium: response to growth temperature. FEMS Microbiol Lett 152:349–54.
Norland S, Fagerbakke K, Heldel M. 1995. Light element analysis of individual bacteria by X-ray microanalysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1357–62.
Parton W, Silver WL, Burke IC, Grassens L, Harmon ME, Currie WS, King JY, Adair EC, Brandt LA, Hart SC, Fasth B. 2007. Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science 315:361–4.
Pernthaler A, Amann R. 2004. Simultaneous fluorescence in situ hybridization of mRNA and rRNA in environmental bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:5426–33.
Phillippot L, ASG E, Battin TJ, Prosser JI, Schimel JP, Whitman WB, Hallin S. 2010. The ecological coherence of high bacterial taxonomic ranks. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:523–9.
Prosser JI, Bohannan BJM, Curtis TP, Ellis RJ, Firestone MK, Freckleton RP, Green JL, Green LE, Kilham K, Lennon JJ, Osborn AM, Solan M, van der Gast CJ, Young JPW. 2007. The role of ecological theory in microbial ecology. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:385–92.
Ratcliff WC, Kadam SV, Denison RF. 2008. Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) supports survival and reproduction in starving rhizobia. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 65:391–9.
Redfield AC. 1958. The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. Am Sci 46:205–21.
Schuster KC, Urlaub E, Gapes JR. 2000. Single-cell analysis of bacteria by Raman microscopy: spectral information on the chemical composition of cells and on the heterogeneity in a culture. J Microbiol Methods 42:29–38.
Shade A, Kent AD, Jones SE, Newton RJ, Triplett EW, McMahon KD. 2007. Interannual dynamics and phenology of bacterial communities in a eutrophic lake. Limnol Oceanogr 52:487–94.
Sterner RW. 1990. The ratio of nitrogen to phosphorus resupplied by herbivores: zooplankton and the algal competitive arena. Am Nat 136:209–29.
Sterner RW, Elser JJ. 2002. Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of the elements from the molecules to the biosphere. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Strom SL. 2008. Microbial ecology of ocean biogeochemistry: a community perspective. Science 320:1043–5.
Taylor PG, Townsend AR. 2010. Stoichiometric control of organic carbon-nitrate relationships from soils to the sea. Nature 464:1178–81.
Tezuka Y. 1990. Bacterial regeneration of ammonium and phosphate as affected by the carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus ratio of organic substrates. Microb Ecol 19:227–38.
Van Mooy BAS, Fredricks HF, Pedler BE, Dyhrman ST, Karl DM, Koblizek M, Lomas MW, Mincer T, Moore LR, Moutin T, Rappe MS. 2009. Phytoplankton in the ocean substitute lipids in response to phosphorus scarcity. Nature 458:69–72.
Vrede K, Heldal M, Norland S, Bratbak G. 2002. Elemental composition (C, N, P) and cell volume of exponentially growing and nutrient limited bacterioplankton. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2965–71.
Vrede T, Dobberfuhl DR, Kooijman SALM, Elser JJ. 2004. Fundamental connections among organism C:N:P stoichiometry, macromolecular composition, and growth. Ecology 85:1217–29.
Wackett LP, Dodge AG, Ellis LBM. 2004. Microbial genomics and the periodic table. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:647–55.
Wagner M. 2009. Single cell ecophysiology of microbes as revealed by Raman microspectroscopy or secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:411–29.
Wagner M, Schmid M, Juretschko S, Trebesius KH, Bubert A, Goebel W, Schleife K-H. 1998. In situ detection of a virulence factor mRNA and 16S rRNA in Listeria monocytogenes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 160:159–68.
Wagner M, Horn M, Daims H. 2003. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for the identification of prokaryotes. Curr Opin Microbiol 6:302–9.
Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ. 1998. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:6578–83.
Zak DR, Blackwood CB, Waldrop MP. 2007. A molecular dawn for biogeochemistry. Trends Ecol Evol 21:288–95.
Zwart G, Crump BC, Kamst-van Agterveld MP, Hagen F, Han S-K. 2002. Typical freshwater bacteria: an analysis of available 16S rRNA gene sequences from plankton of lakes and rivers. Aquat Microb Ecol 28:141–55.
Acknowledgments
This work is a contribution from the Research Network MICDIF and was supported by the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) specifically S10005-B17 for TB, S10008-BI7 for OF, and no. S10002-B17 for HD. The current version of this manuscript was greatly improved by feedback from Jim Cotner, Sarah Hobbie, Jim Hood, Josh Schimel, Maren Striebel, the Battin working group and two anonymous reviewers. Data from the lake survey were produced from research funded by a National Science Foundation IRCEB grant (DEB 9977047) awarded to Jim Cotner.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author Contributions
EKH conceived the study, performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the paper; FM conceived the study, contributed new methods; OF contributed new model; HD contributed new methods; AR conceived or designed the study; TB wrote the paper.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Hall, E.K., Maixner, F., Franklin, O. et al. Linking Microbial and Ecosystem Ecology Using Ecological Stoichiometry: A Synthesis of Conceptual and Empirical Approaches. Ecosystems 14, 261–273 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-010-9408-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-010-9408-4