Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Density functional theory study of π-aromatic interaction of benzene, phenol, catechol, dopamine isolated dimers and adsorbed on graphene surface

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze the influence of different groups on the intermolecular energy of aromatic homodimers and on the interaction between a single aromatic molecule and a graphene surface. The analysis is performed for benzene, phenol, catechol, and dopamine. For calculating the energies, we employ density functional theory within the local density approximation (LDA-DFT). Our results show that the lowest intermolecular energies between the aromatic molecules are related to the T-shaped configurations. This lower energy results from the quadrupole interaction. In the case of the interaction between the graphene sheet and the aromatic molecules, the lowest energy configuration is the face to face. The adsorption energy of a molecule on a graphene surface involves π − π interactions that explain the face to face arrangement. These results provide insight into the manner by which substituents can be utilized in crystal engineering, supramolecular chemistry, bioinspired materials, formation of various molecular clusters, parameterization of force fields suitable for classical simulations, and design of novel sensing, drug delivery, and filters based on graphene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iijima S, Ichihashi T (1993) Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. Nature 363:603

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moraes EE, Manhabosco TM, De Oliveira AB, Batista RJ (2012) Tunable band gap of boron nitride interfaces under uniaxial pressure. J Phys: Condens Matter 24:475502

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moraes EE, Coutinho-Filho MD, Batista RJ (2017) Transport properties of hydrogenated cubic boron nitride nanofilms with gold electrodes from density functional theory. ACS Omega 2(4):1696–1701

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306:666–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Neto AC, Guinea F, Peres NM, Novoselov KS, Geim AK (2009) The electronic properties of graphene. Rev Mod Phys 81:109

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rao C, Sood A, Subrahmanyam K, Govindaraj A (2009) Graphene: the new two-dimensional nanomaterial. Angew Chem Int Ed 48:7752–7777

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gan T, Hu S (2011) Electrochemical sensors based on graphene materials. Microchim Acta 175:1

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tonel M, Lara I, Zanella I, Fagan S (2017) The influence of the concentration and adsorption sites of different chemical groups on graphene through first principles simulations. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19:27374–27383

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tonel MZ, Martins MO, Zanella I, Pontes RB, Fagan SB (2017) A first-principles study of the interaction of doxorubicin with graphene. Comput Theor Chem 1115:270–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen RJ, Bangsaruntip S, Drouvalakis KA, Kam NWS, Shim M, Li Y, Kim W, Utz PJ, Dai H (2003) Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes for highly specific electronic biosensors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:4984–4989

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kang HS (2005) Theoretical study of binding of metal-doped graphene sheet and carbon nanotubes with dioxin. J Am Chem Soc 127:9839–9843

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gowtham S, Scheicher RH, Ahuja R, Pandey R, Karna SP (2007) Physisorption of nucleobases on graphene: density-functional calculations. Phys Rev B 76:033401

    Google Scholar 

  13. Varghese N, Mogera U, Govindaraj A, Das A, Maiti PK, Sood AK, Rao C (2009) Binding of dna nucleobases and nucleosides with graphene. Chem Phys Chem 10:206–210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cazorla C (2010) Ab initio study of the binding of collagen amino acids to graphene and a-doped (a= h, ca) graphene. Thin Solid Films 518:6951–6961

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Umadevi D, Sastry GN (2011) Quantum mechanical study of physisorption of nucleobases on carbon materials: graphene versus carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem Lett 2:1572–1576

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cazorla C, Rojas-Cervellera V, Rovira C (2012) Calcium-based functionalization of carbon nanostructures for peptide immobilization in aqueous media. J Mat Chem 22:19684– 19693

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vovusha H, Sanyal S, Sanyal B (2013) Interaction of nucleobases and aromatic amino acids with graphene oxide and graphene flakes. J Phys Chem Lett 4:3710–3718

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen L, Li X, Tanner EE, Compton RG (2017) Catechol adsorption on graphene nanoplatelets: isotherm, flat to vertical phase transition and desorption kinetics. Chem Sci 8:4771–4778

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Li D, Müller MB, Gilje S, Kaner RB, Wallace GG (2008) Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nat Nanotechnol 3:101

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dong X, Fu D, Fang W, Shi Y, Chen P, Li L-J (2009) Doping single-layer graphene with aromatic molecules. Small 5:1422–1426

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu T, Cai X, Tan S, Li H, Liu J, Yang W (2011) Adsorption characteristics of acrylonitrile, p-toluenesulfonic acid, 1-naphthalenesulfonic acid and methyl blue on graphene in aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 173:144–149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hwang YH, Chun HS, Ok KM, Lee K-K, Kwak K (2015) Density functional investigation of graphene doped with amine-based organic molecules. J Nanomater 2015:5

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kong L, Román-Pérez G, Soler JM, Langreth DC (2009) Energetics and dynamics of h 2 adsorbed in a nanoporous material at low temperature. Phys Rev Lett 103:096103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cacelli I, Cinacchi G, Prampolini G, Tani A (2004) Computer simulation of solid and liquid benzene with an atomistic interaction potential derived from ab initio calculations. J Am Chem Soc 126:14278–14286

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Amovilli C, Cacelli I, Cinacchi G, De Gaetani L, Prampolini G, Tani A (2007) Structure and dynamics of mesogens using intermolecular potentials derived from ab initio calculations. Theor Chem Acc 117:885–901

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cacelli I, Cimoli A, Livotto PR, Prampolini G (2012) An automated approach for the parameterization of accurate intermolecular force-fields: pyridine as a case study. J Comput Chem 33:1055–1067

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hobza P, Selzle HL, Schlag EW (1994) Structure and properties of benzene-containing molecular clusters: nonempirical ab initio calculations and experiments. Chem Rev 94:1767–1785

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bieske EJ, Dopfer O (2000) High-resolution spectroscopy of cluster ions. Chem Rev 100:3963–3998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tarakeshwar P, Kim KS, Brutschy B (2001) σ to π conformational transition: interactions of the water trimer with π systems. J Chem Phys 114:1295–1305

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Guin M, Patwari GN, Karthikeyan S, Kim KS (2009) A π-stacked phenylacetylene and 1, 3, 5-triazine heterodimer: a combined spectroscopic and ab initio investigation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 11:11207–11212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hoeben FJ, Jonkheijm P, Meijer E, Schenning AP (2005) About supramolecular assemblies of π-conjugated systems. Chem Rev 105:1491–1546

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cerný J, Kabelác M, Hobza P (2008) Double-helical ladder structural transition in the b-dna is induced by a loss of dispersion energy. J Am Chem Soc 130:16055–16059

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Meyer EA, Castellano RK, Diederich F (2003) Interactions with aromatic rings in chemical and biological recognition. Angew Chem Int Ed 42:1210–1250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee JY, Hong BH, Kim WY, Min SK, Kim Y, Jouravlev MV, Bose R, Kim KS, Hwang I-C, Kaufman LJ et al (2009) Near-field focusing and magnification through self-assembled nanoscale spherical lenses. Nature 460:498

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Vaupel S, Brutschy B, Tarakeshwar P, Kim KS (2006) Characterization of weak nh- π intermolecular interactions of ammonia with various substituted π-systems. J Am Chem Soc 128:5416–5426

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tarakeshwar P, Choi HS, Kim KS (2001) Olefinic vs aromatic π- h interaction: a theoretical investigation of the nature of interaction of first-row hydrides with ethene and benzene. J Am Chem Soc 123:3323–3331

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hohenstein EG, Sherrill CD (2009) Effects of heteroatoms on aromatic π- π interactions: benzene- pyridine and pyridine dimer. J Phys Chem A 113:878–886

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Piacenza M, Grimme S (2005) Van der waals complexes of polar aromatic molecules: unexpected structures for dimers of azulene. J Am Chem Soc 127:14841–14848

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ringer AL, Sherrill CD (2009) Substituent effects in sandwich configurations of multiply substituted benzene dimers are not solely governed by electrostatic control. J Am Chem Soc 131:4574–4575

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Geronimo I, Singh NJ, Kim KS (2011) Can electron-rich π systems bind anions. J Chem Theory Comput 7:825–829

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kołaski M, Kumar A, Singh NJ, Kim KS (2011) Differences in structure, energy, and spectrum between neutral, protonated, and deprotonated phenol dimers: comparison of various density functionals with ab initio theory. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:991–1001

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hohenberg P (1964) Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev B 136:864

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kohn W (1965) Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev A 140:1133

    Google Scholar 

  44. Soler JM, Artacho E, Gale JD, García A, Junquera J, Ordejón P, Sánchez-Portal D (2002) The siesta method for ab initio order-n materials simulation. J Phys: Condens Matter 14:2745

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Perdew JP, Zunger A (1981) Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems. Phys Rev B 23:5048

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Boys SF, Bernardi Fd (1970) The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of separate total energies. some procedures with reduced errors. Molec Phys 19:553–566

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Artacho E, Anglada E, Diéguez O, Gale JD, García A, Junquera J, Martin RM, Ordejón P, Pruneda JM, Sánchez-Portal D et al (2008) The siesta method; developments and applicability. J Phys: Condens Matter 20:064208

    Google Scholar 

  49. Grimme S (2006) Semiempirical gga-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J Comput Chem 27:1787–1799

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Prampolini G, Livotto PR, Cacelli I (2015) Accuracy of quantum mechanically derived force-fields parameterized from dispersion-corrected dft data: the benzene dimer as a prototype for aromatic interactions. J Chem Theory Comput 11:5182–5196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tournus F, Charlier J-C (2005) Ab initio study of benzene adsorption on carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 71:165421

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sato T, Tsuneda T, Hirao K (2005) A density-functional study on π-aromatic interaction: benzene dimer and naphthalene dimer. J Chem Phys 123:104307

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Chakarova-Käck SD, Schröder E, Lundqvist BI, Langreth DC (2006) Application of van der waals density functional to an extended system: Adsorption of benzene and naphthalene on graphite. Phys Rev Lett 96:146107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sinnokrot MO, Sherrill CD (2003) Unexpected substituent effects in face-to-face π-stacking interactions. J Phys Chem A 107:8377–8379

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Tsuzuki S, Honda K, Uchimaru T, Mikami M, Tanabe K (2002) Origin of attraction and directionality of the π/π interaction: model chemistry calculations of benzene dimer interaction. J Am Chem Soc 124:104–112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Grover J, Walters E, Hui E (1987) Dissociation energies of the benzene dimer and dimer cation. J Phys Chem Chem 91:3233–3237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Sinnokrot MO, Sherrill CD (2004) Substituent effects in π- π interactions: sandwich and t-shaped configurations. J Am Chem Soc 126:7690–7697

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Cozzi F, Siegel J (1995) Interaction between stacked aryl groups in 1, 8-diarylnaphthalenes: dominance of polar/π over charge-transfer effects. Pure Appl Chem 67:683–689

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Cozzi F, Ponzini F, Annunziata R, Cinquini M, Siegel JS (1995) Polar interactions between stacked π systems in fluorinated 1, 8-diarylnaphthalenes: importance of quadrupole moments in molecular recognition. Angew Chem Int Ed 34:1019–1020

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Barone V, Cacelli I, Ferretti A, Prampolini G (2017) Noncovalent interactions in the catechol dimer. Biomim 2:18

    Google Scholar 

  61. Purushotham U, Sastry GN (2012) Exploration of conformations and quantum chemical investigation of l-tyrosine dimers, anions, cations and zwitterions: a dft study. Theor Chem Acc 131:1093

    Google Scholar 

  62. Furlan A, Almarza NG, Barbosa M (2016) Lattice model for water-solute mixtures. J Chem Phys 145:144501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Furlan A, Lomba E, Barbosa M (2017) Temperature of maximum density and excess properties of short-chain alcohol aqueous solutions: a simplified model simulation study. J Chem Phys 146:144503

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. AlZahrani A (2010) First-principles study on the structural and electronic properties of graphene upon benzene and naphthalene adsorption. Appl Surf Sci 257:807–810

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Giannozzi P, Baroni S, Bonini N, Calandra M, Car R, Cavazzoni C, Ceresoli D, Chiarotti GL, Cococcioni M, Dabo I et al (2009) Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J Phys: Condens Matter 21:395502

    Google Scholar 

  66. Kong L, Enders A, Rahman TS, Dowben PA (2014) Molecular adsorption on graphene. J Phys: Condens Matter 26:443001

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hernández JMG, Anota EC, de la Cruz MTR, Melchor MG, Cocoletzi GH (2012) First principles studies of the graphene-phenol interactions. J Mol Mod 18:3857–3866

    Google Scholar 

  68. Giese TJ, York DM (2010) Density-functional expansion methods: evaluation of lda, gga, and meta-gga functionals and different integral approximations. J Chem Phys 133:244107

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Boukhvalov D (2013) Dft modeling of the covalent functionalization of graphene: from ideal to realistic models. Rsc Adv 3:7150–7159

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Avila Y, Cocoletzi GH, Romero MT (2014) First principles calculations of phenol adsorption on pristine and group iii (b, al, ga) doped graphene layers. J Mol Model 20:2112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Mian SA, Saha LC, Jang J, Wang L, Gao X, Nagase S (2010) Density functional theory study of catechol adhesion on silica surfaces. J Phys Chem C 114:20793–20800

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Mian SA, Yang L-M, Saha LC, Ahmed E, Ajmal M, Ganz E (2014) A fundamental understanding of catechol and water adsorption on a hydrophilic silica surface: exploring the underwater adhesion mechanism of mussels on an atomic scale. Langmuir 30:6906–6914

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Fernández ACR, Castellani NJ (2017) Noncovalent interactions between dopamine and regular and defective graphene. ChemPhysChem 18(15):2065–2080

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhang H-p, Lin X-y, Lu X, Wang Z, Fang L, Tang Y (2017) Understanding the interfacial interactions between dopamine and different graphenes for biomedical materials. Mater Chem Front 1(6):1156–1164

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Antony J, Grimme S (2008) Structures and interaction energies of stacked graphene–nucleobase complexes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 10:2722–2729

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Li Y, Liao M, Zhou J (2018) Catechol and its derivatives adhesion on graphene: insights from molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem C 122:22965–22974

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Caixa Postal 15051, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 91501-970, Brazil

    Elizane E. de Moraes, Mariana Z. Tonel & Marcia C. Barbosa

  2. Universidade Franciscana, Santa Maria, RS, 97010-032, Brazil

    Solange B. Fagan

Authors
  1. Elizane E. de Moraes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mariana Z. Tonel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Solange B. Fagan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marcia C. Barbosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizane E. de Moraes.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Moraes, E. ., Tonel, M.Z., Fagan, S.B. et al. Density functional theory study of π-aromatic interaction of benzene, phenol, catechol, dopamine isolated dimers and adsorbed on graphene surface. J Mol Model 25, 302 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-019-4185-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-019-4185-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation