Skip to main content
Log in

Strategic views of accreditation

The case of an analytical food research laboratory

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

This paper summarises the experience we gained while going through an accreditation process in accordance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 Standard. We propose in this paper an initial path finding study stage to evaluate the laboratory's predisposition for, and the benefits of, accreditation. We also present a conceptual framework as part of the path finding study stage to identify and classify different groups of activities in a laboratory into separate business domains. The objective of the study is to assess, for each business domain, the approach, the benefits, costs and implications of working with a systematic QA and then design a priori appropriate working systems tailored to the real needs of each business. Such a study should naturally lead to an appropriate definition of accreditation scope.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Food Products Unit (FPU), part of the Directorate General Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, was until recently located at the Ispra-Italy site. Following a rationalisation restructuring in the year 2002, its activities were joined with those of the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) and it was transferred to the Geel-Belgium site. The mission of the FPU and of the new Food Safety and Quality Unit in Geel was/is to develop, validate and harmonise analytical methods at European level, to monitor chemical, physical and biological parameters and to disseminate the results in the field of food and other consumables.

References

  1. Williams A (1996) Measurement uncertainty in analytical chemistry. Accred Qual Assur 1:14–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wood R, Thompson M (1996) Proficiency testing in analytical laboratories: how to make it work. Accred Qual Assur 1:49–56

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Price G (2002) An arrogance of technicians. J Accred Qual Assur 7: 77–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deijk W van (1996) Accreditation: worth the trouble? Accred Qual Assur 1:197–200

  5. Mathur-DE-Vré (1997) Approach to quality system in research and development. Accred Qual Assur 2:63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wallin HC (1996) Why do food analysts need quality assurance. AccredQual Assur 1:163–170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Holcombe DG (1999) Living with multiple standards–QA in a multidisciplinary laboratory. Accred Qual Assur 4:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Forstén J (2002) Experience of implementing of ISO/IEC 17025: conclusions and recommendations of a workshop. Accred Qual Assur 7:234–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ISO/IEC 17025 International Standard (1999) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO, Geneva

  10. Moss Kanter E, Summers D (1994) In: Mckevitt D, Lawton A (eds) Public sector management. The Open University

  11. EEC Council Directive (1989) 89/397/EEC O.J. L186 of 30.6.1989

  12. EEC Council Directive (1993) 93/99/EEC O.J. L290 of 24.11.1993

  13. Wood R (1996) Review of European Union requirements; quality standards for food analysis laboratories. Accred Qual Assur 1:140–149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. European Standard EN 45000 (1989) General criteria for the operation of testing laboratories

  15. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1992) The OECD principles of good laboratory practice. Environmental Monograph no 45 OCED/GD(992)32

  16. King B, Boley G, Kannan G (1999) The correlation of laboratory performance in proficiency testing with other QA characteristics. Accred Qual Assur 4:280–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Publication Reference EA-2/05 rev2 (2001) European Co-operation for Accreditation

  18. ISO/IEC Guide 25 (1993) General requirements for the competence of calibration and testing laboratories, 2nd edn. ISO, Geneva

  19. ISO 9000 series of standards (1994) ISO 9001:1994 Quality systems—model for quality assurance in design/development production installation and servicing); ISO 9002:1994 Quality systems—Model for quality assurance in production and installation; ISO 9003:1994 Quality systems—model for quality assurance in installation and servicing

  20. EURACHEM/CITAC (1998) Guide CG2 Quality assurance for research and development and non-routine analysis, 1st edn. Teddington, UK, October 1998

  21. Abell D (1980) Defining the business: the starting point of strategic planning. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment.

The author would like to thank Mr. Hanspeter Ischi, the European Co-operation for Accreditation (EA) chairman of Laboratory Committee for his ideas and debates.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elke Anklam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dizadji, F., Anklam, E. Strategic views of accreditation. Accred Qual Assur 9, 317–322 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0659-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0659-z

Keywords

Navigation