Skip to main content
Log in

Electromagnetic Transitions in the Spectrum of a Confined Hydrogen Atom

  • Published:
Few-Body Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transition probabilities per time unit in the spectrum of the hydrogen atom confined in a spherical cavity are studied with the Dirac equation. The calculations are performed with simple and accurate expansions of the Dirac components provided by the Lagrange-mesh method with small numbers of scaled Jacobi mesh points. The initial and final states as well as intermediate states occurring in two-photon transitions are described with a single Lagrange mesh. With this simplification, accurate matrix elements are easily computed with the Gauss quadrature associated with the Lagrange–Jacobi mesh. One-photon transitions are considered from the \(n = 2\) and 3 levels. Most transition probabilities increase as a negative power of the confinement radius when it becomes small. The two-photon \(2s_{1/2}-1s_{1/2}\) transition stops being the main deexcitation channel of the \(2s_{1/2}\) level when the confinement radius decreases below about 15 atomic units. The \(2p_{1/2}\) and \(2p_{3/2}\) levels come below the \(2s_{1/2}\) level and allow a faster one-photon deexcitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Michels, J.D. Boer, A. Bijl, Physica 4, 981 (1937)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. L.G. Jiao, L.R. Zan, Y.Z. Zhang, Y.K. Ho, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 117, e25375 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Olivares-Pilón, S.A. Cruz, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 117, e25399 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R.A. Rojas, N. Aquino, A. Flores-Riveros, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 118, e25584 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Aquino, G. Campoy, H.E. Montgomery, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 107, 1548 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Aquino, R.A. Rojas, Few-Body Syst. 61, 16 (2020)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Baye, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 119, e26034 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Baye, P.-H. Heenen, J. Phys. A 19, 2041 (1986)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Vincke, L. Malegat, D. Baye, J. Phys. B 26, 811 (1993)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Baye, M. Hesse, M. Vincke, Phys. Rev. E 65, 026701 (2002)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Baye, Phys. Rep. 565, 1 (2015)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Baye, L. Filippin, M. Godefroid, Phys. Rev. E 89, 043305 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Filippin, M. Godefroid, D. Baye, Phys. Rev. A 90, 052520 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Filippin, M. Godefroid, D. Baye, Phys. Rev. A 93, 012517 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Baye, M. Hesse, J.-M. Sparenberg, M. Vincke, J. Phys. B 31, 3439 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Tiesinga, P.J. Mohr, D.B. Newell, B.N. Taylor, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025010 (2021)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. I.P. Grant, Relativistic Quantum Theory of Atoms and Molecules (Springer, New York, 2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. W.R. Johnson, Atomic Structure Theory (Springer, Berlin, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. I.P. Grant, J. Phys. B 7, 1458 (1974)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. J.P. Santos, F. Parente, P. Indelicato, Eur. Phys. J. D 3, 43 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Amaro, J.P. Santos, F. Parente, A. Surzhykov, P. Indelicato, Phys. Rev. A 79, 062504 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Abramowitz, I.A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Dover, New York, 1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. S.P. Goldman, G.W.F. Drake, Phys. Rev. A 24, 183 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. P. Amaro, A. Surzhykov, F. Parente, P. Indelicato, J.P. Santos, J. Phys. A 44, 245302 (2011)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. G.W.F. Drake, Phys. Rev. A 34, 2871 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. G. Szegö, Orthogonal Polynomials (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1967)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. D. Baye, J. Phys. B 28, 4399 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. U.D. Jentschura, A. Surzhykov, Phys. Rev. A 77, 042507 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. D. Baye, K.D. Sen, Phys. Rev. E 78, 026701 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique - FNRS under Grant Number 4.45.10.08.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Baye.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Nonrelativistic Treatment

Nonrelativistic Treatment

Nonrelativistic transition probabilities can be calculated in two different ways. First, the electric matrix elements (9) are computed with \(I_L^\pm = 0\) and

$$\begin{aligned} J_L(\omega ) = \int _0^\infty u_{l_f}(r) u_{l_i}(r) j_L(\alpha \omega r) dr, \end{aligned}$$
(A1)

where \(u_l(r)\) is a radial wave function obtained from the Schrödinger equation. Second, the integral \(J_L\) is calculated at the long-wavelength approximation, i.e. with \(j_L(\alpha \omega r)\) replaced by the first term of its Taylor expansion,

$$\begin{aligned} J_L(\omega ) \approx \frac{(\alpha \omega )^L}{(2L+1)!!}\int _0^\infty u_{l_f}(r) u_{l_i}(r) r^L dr. \end{aligned}$$
(A2)

Both options are considered below.

The relativistic results of Table 2 summed over the final j values are compared in Table 4 with both types of nonrelativistic transition probabilities. The Schrödinger equation is solved with expansions in shifted Lagrange–Legendre functions regularized at 0 and 1 in the confined case [11, 29] and in Lagrange–Laguerre functions regularized at the origin in the free case [10, 11]. The probabilities are obtained from integrals (A1) and (A2) computed with the corresponding Gauss quadrature.

Table 4 Relativistic and nonrelativistic E1 transition probabilities per second from \(n_i = 2\) levels as a function of the cavity radius R, computed with \(N = 20\)

For \(R = 0.1\) and 1, the nonrelativistic results are larger than the relativistic ones but one observes the opposite at \(R = \infty \). The long-wavelength approximation is a little larger than the calculation with (A1), as expected. For \(R = 0.1\), the nonrelativistic results are about 20 % larger than the relativistic ones. At \(R = 1\), the difference decreases to about 0.2 %. For \(R = 10\), both results are quite close. Beyond \(R \approx 9\), the relativistic values become larger than those with obtained with (A1) and, beyond \(R \approx 12.5\), they become the largest. For the free hydrogen atom, the long-wavelength analytical value \(W(2p \rightarrow 1s) = 2^8 \alpha ^4 c/3^8 a_0\) is reproduced by the mesh calculation for all presented digits. The comparison between the results for the \(2s \rightarrow 2p\) transition is mostly influenced by the size and variations of the energy gaps between the 2p and 2s levels in both treatments.

In Table 5, nonrelativistic 2E1 transition probabilities are compared with results of Table 3. The long-wavelength expression for \(W(2s \rightarrow 1s)\) is equivalent to Eqs. (12) and (14) of Ref. [25]. With the conditions of Ref. [25], I obtain 8.229381045632 in agreement with Drake’s extrapolated value 8.22938104. For \(R = 20\) and \(\infty \), the nonrelativistic result is larger by \(1.3 \times 10^{-4}\) than the relativistic one and, at the long-wavelength approximation, by \(2.9 \times 10^{-4}\).

Table 5 Relativistic and nonrelativistic 2E1 transition probabilities per second computed with \(N = 20\) and \(N_{\omega _1} = 30\)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baye, D. Electromagnetic Transitions in the Spectrum of a Confined Hydrogen Atom. Few-Body Syst 63, 33 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-022-01732-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-022-01732-6

Navigation