Skip to main content
Log in

A system of predictive scores to evaluate the risk of multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures in patients with traumatic cervical spine injury

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To develop a predictive scoring system to identify traumatic cervical spine injury patients at a high risk of having multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures.

Methods

This 12-year retrospective observational cohort study included 588 traumatic cervical spine-injured patients. Patients were categorized into two groups: patients with multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures and patients without this remote injury. Potential risk factors were examined using multivariable analysis to derive a predictive risk score from independent predictors. Results are presented as odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The accuracy of the calculated predicted score was demonstrated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC).

Results

The incidence of noncontiguous fracture among the patients was 17% (100 of 588). The independent risk factors associated with multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures were motor weakness, intracranial injury, intrathoracic injury, and intraabdominal injury. The AuROC of the prediction score was 0.74 (95% CI 0.69, 0.80). The patients were classified into three groups, low-risk group (score< 1), moderate-risk group (score 1–2.5), and high-risk group (score≥ 3), based on the predicted risk of multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures.

Conclusions

This tool can potentially help preventing the missed diagnosis of cervical spine injuries with multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures. CT scans or MRI of the entire spine to investigate remote multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures may have a role in cervical spine-injured patients who have at least one of the independent risk factors and are strongly suggested for patients with scores in the high-risk group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoffman JR, Schriger DL, Mower W, Luo JS, Zucker M (1992) Low-risk criteria for cervical-spine radiography in blunt trauma: a prospective study. Ann Emerg Med 21:1454–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80059-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Roberge RJ, Wears RC, Kelly M, Evans TC, Kenny MA, Daffner RD, Kremen R, Murray K, Cottington EC (1988) Selective application of cervical spine radiography in alert victims of blunt trauma: a prospective study. J Trauma 28:784–788. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198806000-00010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wittenberg RH, Hargus S, Steffen R, Muhr G, Bötel U (2002) Noncontiguous unstable spine fractures. Spine 27:254–257. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200202010-00010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Korres DS, Boscainos PJ, Papagelopoulos PJ, Psycharis I, Goudelis G, Nikolopoulos K (2003) Multiple level noncontiguous fractures of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 411:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000068362.47147.a2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lian XF, Zhao J, Hou TS, Yuan JD, Jin GY, Li ZH (2007) The treatment for multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures. Int Orthop 31:647–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0241-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Powell JN, Waddell JP, Tucker WS, Transfeldt EE (1989) Multiple-level noncontiguous spinal fractures. J Trauma 29:1146–1150. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198908000-00013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Calenoff L, Chessare JW, Rogers LF, Toerge J, Rosen JS (1978) Multiple level spinal injuries: importance of early recognition. AJR Am J Roentgenol 130:665–669. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.130.4.665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta A, el Masri WS (1989) Multilevel spinal injuries. Incidence, distribution and neurological patterns. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:692–695. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.71b4.2768324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mathesul A, Daniel S, Chandanwale A, Bhise S (2016) Evaluation of non-contiguous spine fractures and extraspinal injuries in spine fracture patients: a prospective study. Int J Sci Study 4(38):42

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nelson DW, Martin MJ, Martin ND, Beekley A (2013) Evaluation of the risk of noncontiguous fractures of the spine in blunt trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 75:135–139. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e3182984a08

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Das SK, Sekar A, Jaidev S, Patnaik A, Sahu RN (2022) Contiguous-level unilateral cervical spine facet dislocation-a report of a less discussed subtype. J Neurosci Rural Pract 13:155–158. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bentley G, McSweeney T (1968) Multiple spinal injuries. Br J Surg 55:565–570. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800550802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vaccaro AR, An HS, Lin S, Sun S, Balderston RA, Cotler JM (1992) Noncontiguous injuries of the spine. J Spinal Disord 5:320–329. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-199209000-00010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller CP, Brubacher JW, Biswas D, Lawrence BD, Whang PG, Grauer JN (2011) The incidence of noncontiguous spinal fractures and other traumatic injuries associated with cervical spine fractures: a 10-year experience at an academic medical center. Spine 36:1532–1540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanna RM, Gaike CV, Mahesh A, Shetty AP, Rajasekaran S (2016) Multilevel non-contiguous spinal injuries: incidence and patterns based on whole spine MRI. Eur Spine J 25:1163–1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4209-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Silver JR, Morris WR, Otfinowski JS (1980) Associated injuries in patients with spinal injury. Injury 12:219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(80)90011-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saboe LA, Reid DC, Davis LA, Warren SA, Grace MG (1991) Spine trauma and associated injuries. J Trauma 31:43–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199101000-00010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Venkatesan M, Fong A, Sell PJ (2012) CT scanning reduces the risk of missing a fracture of the thoracolumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:1097–1100. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.94b8.29397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Born CT, Ross SE, Iannacone WM, Schwab CW, DeLong WG (1989) Delayed identification of skeletal injury in multisystem trauma: the ‘missed’ fracture. J Trauma 29:1643–1646. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198912000-00010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reid DC, Henderson R, Saboe L, Miller JD (1987) Etiology and clinical course of missed spine fractures. J Trauma 27:980–986. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198709000-00005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Seçer M, Alagöz F, Uçkun O, Karakoyun OD, Ulutaş M, Polat Ö, Dağlıoğlu E, Dalgıç A, Belen D (2015) Multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures: surgical approach towards clinical characteristics. Asian Spine J 9:889–894. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2015.9.6.889

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Acaroğlu ER, Alanay A (2001) Four-level noncontiguous fracture of the vertebral column: a case report. J Orthop Trauma 15:294–299. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200105000-00010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Uzel AP, Do L (2009) Multilevel contiguous injuries of the lower cervical spine during flexion trauma with delayed diagnosis: a case report. Neurochirurgie 55:585–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2009.04.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Association ASI (2019) International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Inury Association

  25. Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE (2007) Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol 165:710–718. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwk052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR (1995) Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol 48:1503–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00048-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49:1373–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00236-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Concato J, Peduzzi P, Holford TR, Feinstein AR (1995) Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards analysis. I. Background, goals, and general strategy. J Clin Epidemiol 48:1495–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00510-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to G. Lamar Robert, PhD and Chongchit Robert, PhD for reviewing the manuscript

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TB, AC and PA initiated study conception and design. TB, AC and PA performed the data collection and acquisition of data. TB, AC and PA performed the data analysis. TB, AC, AL, WL, KC and PA interpreted the data. TB, AC and PA wrote the original draft of the manuscript. TB, AC, AL, WL, KC and PA edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pichitchai Atthakomol.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committees in Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University approved this study. Informed consent was waived due to nature of the observational study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bunmaprasert, T., Chaiamporn, A., Laohapoonrungsee, A. et al. A system of predictive scores to evaluate the risk of multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures in patients with traumatic cervical spine injury. Eur Spine J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08277-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08277-8

Keywords

Navigation