Skip to main content
Log in

Traumatic thoracic spine fracture: can we predict when MRI would modify the fracture classification or decision-making compared to CT alone?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on fracture classification for thoracic spine fractures (TSFs) compared to computed tomography (CT) alone.

Methods

This study was a retrospective review of 63 consecutive patients with TSFs who underwent CT and MRI within ten days of injury. Three reviewers classified all fractures according to the AOSpine Classification and the Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury severity score (TLAOSIS). Posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury on MRI was defined by “black stripe discontinuity” and on CT by the presence of vertebral body translation, facet joint malalignment, horizontal laminar or spinous process fracture, and interspinous widening. The proportion of patients with AO type A/B/C and with TLAOSIS ≤ 5 and ≥ 6 was compared between CT and MRI. Classification and regression trees were used to create a series of predictive models for the probability of PLC injury in AO type A fractures.

Results

AO classification using CT was as follows: type A in 35 patients (55%), type B in 18 patients (29%), and type C in 10 patients (16%). Thirty-three patients (52%) had a TLAOSIS ≤5, while the remaining 30 (48%) had TLAOSI ≥6. The addition of MRI after CT upgraded type A to type B fractures in 10 patients (16%) and changed TL AOSIS from ≤5 to ≥6 in 8 cases (12.8%). Type A fractures with load sharing score (LSC) ≥6 had a 60% chance of upgrading to type B, while LSC <6 had a 12.5% chance of upgrading to type B.

Conclusions

CT yielded (89%) accuracy in diagnosing PLC injury in TSFs. The addition of MRI after CT substantially changed the AO classification or TLAOISS, compared to CT alone, thus suggesting an added value of MRI for PLC assessment for TSFs classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Reinhold M, Knop C, Beisse R et al (2010) Operative treatment of 733 patients with acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries: comprehensive results from the second, prospective, internet-based multicenter study of the spine study group of the German association of trauma Surgery. Eur Spine J 19:1657–1676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1451-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Spiegl UJA, Schnake KJ, Hartmann F, Katscher S, Riehle M, Scheyerer MJ, Schmeiser G, Siekmann H, Osterhoff G (2021) Traumatic fractures of the thoracic spine. Z Orthop Unfall 159(4):373–382. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1144-3846

  3. Spiegl UJ, Osterhoff G, Bula P et al (2021) Concomitant injuries in patients with thoracic vertebral body fractures—a systematic literature review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03830-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Pizones J, Izquierdo E, Álvarez P et al (2011) Impact of magnetic resonance imaging on decision making for thoracolumbar traumatic fracture diagnosis and treatment. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 3):390–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1913-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Winklhofer S, Thekkumthala-Sommer M, Schmidt D et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging frequently changes classification of acute traumatic thoracolumbar spine injuries. Skeletal Radiol 42:779–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1551-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aly MM, Al-Shoaibi AM, Abduraba Ali S et al (2022) How often would MRI change the thoracolumbar fracture classification or decision-making compared to CT alone? Glob spine J. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221089579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aly MM, Al-Shoaibi AM, Abduraba S et al (2021) Traumatic low lumbar fractures: how often MRI changes the fracture classification or clinical decision-making compared to CT alone? Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06987-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2015) STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 351:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aly MM, Al-Shoaibi AM, Aljuzair AH et al (2022) GSJ-systematic review a proposal for a standardized imaging algorithm to improve the accuracy and reliability for the diagnosis of thoracolumbar posterior ligamentous complex injury in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Glob Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221129220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK et al (1976) (2013) AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine 38:2028–2037. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8a381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aly MM, Al-Shoaibi AM, Zahrani A, Al Fattani A (2021) Analysis of the combined computed tomography findings improves the accuracy of computed tomography for detecting posterior ligamentous complex injury of the thoracolumbar spine as defined by magnetic resonance imaging. World Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JY, Vaccaro AR, Schweitzer KM et al (2007) Assessment of injury to the thoracolumbar posterior ligamentous complex in the setting of normal-appearing plain radiography. Spine J 7:422–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2006.07.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK et al (2016) The surgical algorithm for the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system. Eur Spine J 25:1087–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3982-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Khurana B, Prevedello LM, Bono CM et al (2018) CT for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: can CT findings accurately predict posterior ligament complex injury? Eur Spine J 27:3007–3015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5712-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang L, Zhang H, Chen H, Wu Q (2018) Kyphotic angle of the motion segment most accurately predicts injury to the ligamentous complex on computed tomography scan of thoracolumbar fractures. World Neurosurg 118:e405–e413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Farcy JPC, Weidenbaum M, Glassman SD (1990) Sagittal index in management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 15:958–965

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Javier P, Sánchez-Mariscal F, Zúñiga L, Patricia Álvarez EI (2013) Prospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in diagnosing traumatic injuries of the posterior ligamentous complex of the thoracolumbar spine. Spine 38:745–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shinkins B, Thompson M, Mallett S, Perera R (2013) Diagnostic accuracy studies: how to report and analyse inconclusive test results. BMJ 346:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam med 37(5):360–363

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH, Friedman JH (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Qureshi S, Dhall SS, Anderson PA et al (2019) Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: radiological evaluation. Clin Neurosurg 84:E28–E31. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Aly MM, Elemam RA, El-Sharkawi M, Hurlbert RJ (2022) Injury of the thoracolumbar posterior ligamentous complex: a bibliometric literature review. World Neurosurg 161:21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Middendorp JJ, Patel AA, Schuetz M, Joaquim AF (2013) The precision, accuracy and validity of detecting posterior ligamentous complex injuries of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a critical appraisal of the literature. Eur Spine J 22:461–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2602-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson GM, Zhang M (2002) Regional differences within the human supraspinous and interspinous ligaments: a sheet plastination study. Eur Spine J 11:382–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-001-0378-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Durmaz A, İlter MH, Tuzlali H (2021) Is magnetic resonance imaging needed for decision making diagnosis and treatment of thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00590-021-03165-Z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosenthal BD, Boody BS, Jenkins TJ et al (2018) Thoracolumbar burst fractures. Clin Spine Surg 31:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee JY, Vaccaro AR, Lim MR et al (2005) Thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score: a new paradigm for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine trauma. J Orthop Sci 10:671–675

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Contribution all authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by KAR, MA, AA, WA, MA, AWA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by first author all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed M. Aly.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare they have no commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in relation to the manuscript. Sources of funding: No specific funding was received for this work.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

AlRaddadi, K.K., Al-Shoaibi, A.M., Alnaqeep, A. et al. Traumatic thoracic spine fracture: can we predict when MRI would modify the fracture classification or decision-making compared to CT alone?. Eur Spine J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08196-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08196-8

Keywords

Navigation