Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An injectable nucleus replacement as an adjunct to microdiscectomy: 2 year follow-up in a pilot clinical study

  • Ideas and Technical Innovations
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Literature indicates that loss of disc tissue from herniation and/or surgery can accelerate degeneration of the disc. The associated loss of disc height may correspond with recurrent back and/or leg pain. A novel hydrogel has been developed to replace lost nucleus pulposus and potentially restore normal disc biomechanics following herniation and surgery. A single-center, non-randomized, prospective feasibility study was undertaken to investigate the use of NuCore® Injectable Nucleus hydrogel (Spine Wave, Inc., Shelton, CT, USA) as a replacement for nuclear tissue lost to herniation and microdiscectomy. Fourteen patients were enrolled at the authors’ hospital as the initial site in a worldwide multicenter pilot study. Subjects who were entered into the study suffered from radicular pain due to single-level herniated nucleus pulposus and were non-respondent to conservative therapy. Following a standard microdiscectomy procedure, the hydrogel material was injected into the nuclear void to replace what tissue had been lost to the herniation and surgery. Leg and back pain, function and disability scores were monitored pre- and post-operatively through 2 years. Neurologic and physical evaluations, blood and serum analyses, and radiographic evaluations of disc height and implant stability were also performed. Results showed significant improvement for leg and back pain, as well as function scores. No complications or device related adverse events were observed. MR controls confirmed stable position of the implants with no reherniations. Radiographic measurements indicated better maintenance of disc height compared to literature data on microdiscectomy alone. The NuCore® material appears to protect the disc from early collapse following microdiscectomy; and therefore, may have the potential to slow the degenerative cascade of the spinal segment over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCulloch JA (1996) Focus issue on lumbar disc herniation: macro- and microdiscectomy. Spine 21:45S–56S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koebbe CJ, Maroon JC, Abla A, El-Kadi H, Bost J (2002) Lumbar microdiscectomy: a historical perspective and current technical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 13:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wenger M, Mariani L, Kalbarczyk A, Gröger U (2001) Long-term outcome of 104 patients after lumbar sequestrectomy according to Williams. Neurosurgery 49:329–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carragee EJ, Spinnickie AO, Alamin TF, Paragioudakis S (2006) A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy: short-term outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior annular defect. Spine 31:653–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brinckmann P, Grootenboer H (1991) Change of disc height, radial disc bulge, and intradiscal pressure from discectomy: an in vitro investigation on human lumbar discs. Spine 16:641–646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thome C, Barth MB, Diepers M, Schmiedek P (2006) A prospective randomized comparison of clinical and radiological outcome after lumbar sequestrectomy versus microdiscectomy. Eur Spine J 15:S477–S478

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tibrewal SB, Pearcy MJ (1985) Lumbar intervertebral disc heights in normal subjects and patients with disc herniation. Spine 10:452–454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Hirabayashi K (2001) Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Spine 26:652–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo R, Singer D (2005) Long-term outcome of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the Main lumbar spine study. Spine 30:927–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Korge A, Nydegger T, Polard JL, Mayer H, Husson J (2002) A spiral implant as nucleus prosthesis in the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 11:S149–S153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bertagnoli R, Schönmayr R (2002) Surgical and clinical results with the PDN® prosthetic disc-nucleus device. Eur Spine J 11:S143–S148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Walkenhorst J, Lee D, Spenciner D (2004) Extrusion resistance of an injectable nucleus replacement in the human cadaver spine. Poster IMAST

  13. Kitchel S, Capello J (2003) Injectable biomaterials for augmentation of the nucleus pulposus. Poster IMAST

  14. Dewing CB, Provencher MT, Riffenburgh RH, Kerr S, Manos RE (2008) The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level. Spine 33:33–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Feltes CH, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, Vogel RL et al (2004) Correlation of the amount of disc removed in a lumbar microdiscectomy with long-term outcome. Spine 29:2521–2524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ray CD (2002) The PDN® prosthetic disc-nucleus device. Eur Spine J 11:S137–S142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahrens M, Donkersloot P, Martens F, Sherman J, Le Huec JC, Tsantrizos A et al (2007) Nucleus replacement using an in situ cured, balloon contained, injectable polyurethane device: clinical results from two prospective multicenter European studies. Spine J 7:S103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nachemson A (1962) Some mechanical properties of the lumbar intervertebral disc. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 23:130–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bao QB, Yuan HA (2002) New technologies in Spine: nucleus replacement. Spine 27:1245–1247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chenite A, Chaput C, Wang D, Combes C, Buschmann MD, Hoemann CD et al (2000) Novel injectable neutral solutions of chitosan form biodegradable gels in situ. Biomaterials 21:2155–2161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferrari FA, Richardson C, Chambers J, Causey S, Pollock T, Cappello J et al (2002) Peptides comprising repetitive units of amino acids and DNA sequences encoding the same. US Patent 6,355,776

  22. Hubbell JA, Wetering Pvd, Cowling DSP (2002) Novel polymer compounds. US Patent 2002/0177680

  23. Olsen DR, Chang R, McMullin H, Hitzeman R, Chisholm G (2002) Recombinant gelatin and full-length triple helical collagen. US Patent 6,413,742

  24. Urry DW (1991) Polynanopeptide bioelastomers having an increased elastic modulus. US Patent 5,064,430

  25. Di Martino A, Vaccaro AR, Lee JY, Denaro V, Lim M (2005) Nucleus pulposus replacement: basic science and indications for clinical use. Spine 30:S16–S22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. DeLustro F, Dasch J, Keefe J, Ellingsworth L (1990) Immune response to allogeneic and xenogeneic implants of collagen and collagen derivatives. Clin Orthop 260:263–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mogues T, Junzhi L, Coburn J, Kuter D (2005) IgG antibodies against bovine serum albumin in humans–their prevalence and response to exposure to bovine serum albumin. J Immunol Methods 300:1–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Findlay GF, Hall BI, Musa BS, Oliveira MD, Fear SC (1998) A 10-year follow-up of the outcome of lumbar microdiscectomy. Spine 23:1168–1171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pearson AM, Blood EA, Frymoyer JW, Herkowitz H, Abdu W, Woodward R et al (2008) SPORT lumbar intervertebral disk herniation and back pain—does treatment, location, or morphology matter? Spine 33:428–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kuisma M, Karppinen J, Niinimäki J, Kurunlahti M, Haapea M, Vanharanta H et al (2006) A 3-year follow-up of lumbar spine endplate (Modic) changes. Spine 31:1714–1718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mitra D, Cassar-Pullicino VN, McCall IW (2004) Longitudinal study of vertebral type-1 endplate changes on MR of the lumbar spine. Eur Radiol 14:1574–1581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Toyone T, Takahashi K, Kitahara H, Yamagata M, Murakami M, Moriya H (1994) Vertebral bone-marrow changes in degenerative lumbar disc disease: an MRI study of 74 patients with low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76B:757–764

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mochida J, Toh E, Nomura T, Nishimura K (2001) The risks and benefits of percutaneous nucleotomy for lumbar disc herniation: a 10-year longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83B:501–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gorensek M, Vilendecic M, Eustacchio S, Trummer M, Eskinja N, Ledic D et al (2007) Early clinical results with the intrinsic therapeutics Barricaid® annular repair device—comparison to a prospective control group. Proceedings of the 7th annual global symposium on motion preservation technology, Berlin

  35. Kitano T, Zerwekh JE, Usui Y, Edwards M, Flicker P, Mooney V (1993) Biochemical changes associated with the symptomatic human intervertebral disk. Clin Orthop 293:372–377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Iatridis JC, Weidenbaum M, Setton LA, Mow VC (1996) Is the nucleus pulposus a solid or a fluid? Mechanical behaviors of the nucleus pulposus of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 21:1174–1184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Spine Wave Inc. provided implants and support for this study. Approval for this study was obtained through the Bern Ethics Committee and SwissMedic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Spine Center Thun, Bahnhofstrasse 3, Thun, 3600, Switzerland

    Ulrich Berlemann & Othmar Schwarzenbach

Authors
  1. Ulrich Berlemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Othmar Schwarzenbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Berlemann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berlemann, U., Schwarzenbach, O. An injectable nucleus replacement as an adjunct to microdiscectomy: 2 year follow-up in a pilot clinical study. Eur Spine J 18, 1706–1712 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1136-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1136-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation