Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of gender discordance on surgical outcomes in predominantly female patient surgeries in NYS

  • 2023 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Preliminary evidence demonstrates female surgeons have improved post-operative outcomes compared to male colleagues despite underrepresentation in surgery. This study explores the effect of patient-surgeon gender discordance on outcomes in three specialties with high female patient populations: bariatric, foregut, colorectal.

Methods

This is a retrospective study using the New York State (NYS) SPARCS database and first study evaluating outcomes based on surgeon/patient concordance in NYS. Bariatric, foregut, and colorectal surgery cases from 2013 to 2017 were identified.

Results

Bariatric: female patients (FP) with CC had lower 30-day readmissions but higher complications compared with DC. Male patients (MP) with CC trended towards higher 30-day readmissions but lower complications compared with DC. FP received significantly better influence from CC in 30-day readmission, but disadvantages in complications. There was no significant difference in LOS or ED visits between CC and DC groups for either FP or MP. Foregut: FP with CC had lower LOS, 30-day readmissions, and 30-day ED visits compared with DC. MP showed opposite trends between CC and DC, although non-significant. The benefit from concordance was pronounced in FP compared to MP in LOS, 30-day readmissions, and 30-day ED visit. Concordance vs discordance did not significantly affect complications within either FP or MP group. Colorectal: the difference between CC and DC was not significant within FP or MP groups in any outcomes. When comparing the difference of 30-day readmissions in CC vs DC between FP and MP, there is a significant difference.

Conclusion(s)

Overall, our results show DC between patient and surgeon has significant effect on patient outcomes. A negative effect is seen for female patients in certain specialties, most pronounced in foregut surgery. This emphasizes need for surgeons to be conscious of care provided to opposite gender patients and underscores increasing female surgeons in high FP fields.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Association of American Medical Colleges (2022) Table A-7.2: Applicants, first-time applicants, acceptees, and matriculants to U.S. MD-Granting Medical Schools by gender, 2013-2014 through 2022-2023. AAMC, Washington, DC

  2. Association of American Medical Colleges (2019) AMA physician masterfile. https://www.aamc.org/datareports/workforce/data/active-physicians-age-and-specialty-2019

  3. Association of American Medical Colleges (2022) 2022 physician specialty data report executive report. https://www.aamc.org/media/63371/download?attachment

  4. Association of American Medical Colleges (2021) AMA physician masterfile. https://www.aamc.org/datareports/workforce/data/number-people-active-physician-specialty-2021

  5. Curtin LS, Goldstein RB, Lamb DL (2023) Applicant demographics and the transition to residency: it’s time to leverage data on preferred specialty and match outcomes to inform the National Conversation about Diversity and Equity in Medical Education. National Resident Matching Program

  6. Wallis CJ et al (2017) Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study. BMJ 359:j4366

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Altieri MS et al (2018) Women are underrepresented as top surgical performers as assessed by case volumes in the state of New York. Am J Surg 216(4):666–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Young MT, Phelan MJ, Nguyen NT (2016) A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of male vs female patients who underwent bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Surg 222(3):226–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stefanou A, Gardner C, Rubinfeld I (2022) A retrospective study of the effects of minimally invasive colorectal surgery on patient safety indicators across a five-hospital system. Surg Endosc 36(10):7684–7699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haskins IN et al (2022) Minimally invasive, benign foregut surgery is not associated with long-term, persistent opioid use postoperatively: an analysis of the IBM® MarketScan® database. Surg Endosc 36(11):8430–8440

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wallis CJD et al (2021) Association of surgeon-patient sex concordance with postoperative outcomes. JAMA Surg 157(2):146–156

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. United States Census Bureau (2022) QuickFacts: New York. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/NY#

  13. Ontario Ministry of Finance (2022) Ontario demographic quarterly: highlights of first quart. https://www.ontario.ca/page/ontario-demographic-quarterly-highlights-first-quarter. Accessed 2023

  14. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Plichta JK et al (2020) It’s not you, It’s me: the influence of patient and surgeon gender on patient satisfaction scores. Am J Surg 220(5):1179–1188

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y (2002) Physician gender effects in medical communication: a meta-analytic review. JAMA 288(6):756–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schieber A-C et al (2014) Do gender differences affect the doctor–patient interaction during consultations in general practice? Results from the INTERMEDE study. Fam Pract 31(6):706–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lou ZMD et al (2016) The sex difference in basic surgical skills learning: a comparative study. J Surg Educ 73(5):902–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Satkunasivam R et al (2020) Relation between surgeon age and postoperative outcomes: a population-based cohort study. CMAJ 192(15):E385-e392

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Poushay HMMD et al (2016) Retirement and the general surgeon: a practice survey of intentions and perceptions. J Am Coll Surg 223(4):S117–S118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maruthappu M et al (2015) The influence of volume and experience on individual surgical performance: a systematic review. Ann Surg 261(4):642–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hall EC et al (2013) Better outcomes with higher volumes of acute care surgical procedures. J Surg Res 179(2):206–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mahendran GN et al (2022) Qualitative study of mentorship for women and minorities in surgery. J Am Coll Surg 234(3):253–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oppenheimer-Velez M et al (2022) Women empowering women: assessing the American College of Surgeons Women in Surgery Committee Mentorship Program. J Am Coll Surg 235(2):375–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Naimi BR et al (2023) The role of gender-concordant mentorship in women premedical students' perception and pursuit of surgical careers. J Surg Educ 80(8):1089–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rakestraw SL et al (2022) Closing the gap: increasing female representation in surgical leadership. Am J Surg 223(2):273–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. DiBrito SR et al (2019) Reducing implicit bias: association of women surgeons #HeForShe task force best practice recommendations. J Am Coll Surg 228(3):303–309

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you to SAGES for the Medical Student Summer Research Award which funded the statistical analysis of this study. We acknowledge the biostatistical consultation and support provided by the Biostatistical Consulting Core at School of Medicine, Stony Brook University.

Funding

SAGES Medical Student Summer Research Award funded the statistical analysis of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Smolkin.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Konstantinos Spaniolas is a speaker for Medtronic, Gore and Intuitive. Dr. Aurora D Pryor is a speaker for Medtronic, Stryker and Gore. She is an officer for SAGES Ingenuity. Caroline Smolkin, Xiaoyue Zhang, Ila Sethi, Adrian Torres, and Jie Yang has no disclosures to report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smolkin, C., Zhang, X., Sethi, I. et al. Effect of gender discordance on surgical outcomes in predominantly female patient surgeries in NYS. Surg Endosc 38, 1556–1567 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10595-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10595-9

Keywords

Navigation