Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In-hospital ischaemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with in-hospital strokes (IHS) may be eligible for recanalization therapies. The objective of this study is to compare outcomes in patients with IHS and community-onset strokes (COS) treated by recanalization therapy. We analysed data prospectively collected in consecutive patients treated by thrombolysis, thrombectomy, or both for cerebral ischemia at the Lille University Hospital. We compared four outcomes measures at 3 months in patients with IHS and COS: (1) modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0–1, (2) mRS 0–2, (3) death, and (4) symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (ECASS 2 definition). Of 1209 patients, 64 (5.3%) had IHS, with an increasing proportion over time (p = 0.001). Their median onset-to-needle time was 128 min vs. 145 in COS (p < 0.001). They were more likely to have had a recent TIA [odds ratio (OR) 30.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.5–78.7], to have been treated by vitamin K antagonist before (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.4–12.0) and to undergo mechanical thrombectomy (45 vs. 10%, p < 0.001). They were less likely to have a pre-stroke mRS 0–1 (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.09–0.50). After adjustment, IHS was not associated with any of the four outcome measures. Patients with IHS are treated 17 min earlier than patients with COS, but, taking into account that they were already in the hospital, delays are still too long. Their outcome does not differ from that of patients with COS, suggesting room for improvement if delays can be reduced. IHS being frequent, pre-specified pathways should be organised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Masjuan J, Simal P, Fuentes B et al (2008) In-hospital stroke treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke 39:2614–2616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saltman AP, Silver FL, Fang J et al (2015) Care and outcomes of patients with in-hospital stroke. JAMA Neurol 72:749–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blacker DJ (2003) In-hospital stroke. Lancet Neurol 2:741–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PSSS, Beumer D et al (2015) A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372:11–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ et al (2015) Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 372:1009–1018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK et al (2015) Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372:1019–1030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A et al (2015) Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 372:2285–2295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E et al (2015) Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372:2296–2306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Mas JL et al (2016) Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 15:1138–1147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Badhiwala JH, Nassiri F, Alhazzani W et al (2015) Endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA 314:1832–1843

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cordonnier C, Girot M, Dorp E et al (2000) Stroke units from scientific evidence to practice: the experience of the Lille stroke unit. Cerebrovasc Dis 10(Suppl 4):17–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Decourcelle A, Moulin S, Dequatre-Ponchelle N et al (2017) Are the results of intravenous thrombolysis trials reproduced in clinical practice? Comparison of observed and expected outcomes with the stroke-thrombolytic predictive instrument (s-TPI). Rev Neurol (Paris) 173:381–387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C et al (1998) Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Lancet 352:1245–1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E et al (2008) Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 359:1317–1329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. The European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee (2008) Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis 25:457–507. See update at : http://www.eso-stroke.org

  16. Lyden P, Raman R, Liu L et al (2005) NIHSS training and certification using a new digital video disk is reliable. Stroke 36:2446–2449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ et al (1993) Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 24:35–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC et al (1988) Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 19:604–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Glantz SA, Slinker BK (1990) Primer of applied regression and analysis of variance. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Didier Leys.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Marc Ferrigno, Anais Hochart, Solène Moulin, Nelly Dequatre, Marie Bodenant, Hilde Hénon, Charlotte Cordonnier, and Didier Leys are investigators of ECASS4 (no honoraria). Didier Leys has been member of scientific advisory boards and symposia for Boehringer-Ingelheim (fees paid to ADRINORD). François Caparros and Amélie Decourcelle declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

The registry was approved by the ethical committee of Lille in 2003 and the study classified as observational (CCPPRB, Comité consultatif de protection des personnes dans la recherche biomédicale).

Funding

INSERM U1171, University of Lille, Lille University Hospital, Adrinord.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caparros, F., Ferrigno, M., Decourcelle, A. et al. In-hospital ischaemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy. J Neurol 264, 1804–1810 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8570-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8570-4

Keywords

Navigation