Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of discriminant functions from the rib necks in two Portuguese adult identified populations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism is the basis for sex estimation research in skeletal remains, helping the positive identification of individuals in forensic backgrounds. In this regard, it has been proved that the metrical analysis of the costal neck of the first four ribs in Spanish contemporary adult skeletons shows high sexual dimorphism, especially in the first rib. However, the validation of any method developed in identified skeletal collections must be compulsorily reproduced in other skeletonized sets to verify either its potential application in individuals from other locations, or the existence of possible biases associated with inter-population variation. Due to the geographical and socioeconomic proximity between Spain and Portugal, this paper aims to check the utility of the discriminant functions designed by Partido-Navadijo et al. (2021) in the two skeletal collections of the University of Coimbra (Portugal). Results show the utility of these discriminant functions in Portuguese population, with frequencies of cases correctly assigned reaching up to 93.6% in the Coimbra Identified Skeletal Collection (CISC); and up to 92.6% in the 21st Century Identified Skeletal Collection (CEI/XXI). However, two particularities between the Spanish and Portuguese osteological assemblages can be highlighted: the possible existence of secular changes in relation to the CISC collection (1904–1938); and a reversal in the degree of costal dimorphism, being the third and fourth ribs of the CEI/XXI collection more dimorphic than the first ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Klales A (2020) Practitioner preferences for sex estimation from human skeletal remains. In: Klales A (ed) Sex estimation of the human skeleton history, methods and emerging techniques. Academic Press, Elsevier, Kansas, pp 11–23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Frayer DW, Wolpoff MH (1985) Sexual dimorphism. Annu Rev Anthropol 14(1):429–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson ARW, Jackson JM (2011) Forensic Science. 3a. Jackson ARW, Jackson JM, editors. Gosport: Colour Press Ltd

  4. Dirkmaat DC, Cabo LL, Ousley SD, Symes SA (2008) New perspectives in forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol 137(S47):33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Spradley MK, Jantz RL (2011) Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements. J Forensic Sci 56(2):289–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bethard D, Vansickle C (2020) Applications of sex estimation in and forensic anthropology. In: Klales A, editor. Sex estimation of the human skeleton [Internet]. Elsevier Inc. p. 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815767-1.00003-1

  7. Krishan K, Chatterjee PM, Kanchan T, Kaur S, Baryah N, Singh RK (2016) A review of sex estimation techniques during examination of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology casework. Forensic Sci Int 261:165.e1–165.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.007

  8. Uysal Ramadan S, Türkmen N, Dolgun NA, Gökharman D, Menezes RG, Kacar M et al (2010) Sex determination from measurements of the sternum and fourth rib using multislice computed tomography of the chest. Forensic Sci Int 197(1–3):120.e1–120.e5

  9. Ekizoglu O, Hocaoglu E, Inci E, Bilgili MG, Solmaz D, Erdil I et al (2014) Sex estimation from sternal measurements using multidetector computed tomography. Medicine (United States) 93(27):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  10. García-Parra P, Pérez Fernández Á, Djorojevic M, Botella M, Alemán I (2014) Sexual dimorphism of human sternum in a contemporary spanish population. Forensic Sci Int 1(244):313.e1–313.e9

  11. Bedalov A, Bašić Ž, Marelja I, Dolić K, Bukarica K, Missoni S et al (2019) Sex estimation of the sternum by automatic image processing of multi-slice computed tomography images in a Croatian population sample: a retrospective study. Croat Med J 60:237–245

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Peleg S, Pelleg Kallevag R, Dar G, Steinberg N, Masharawi Y, May H (2020) New methods for sex estimation using sternum and rib morphology. Int J Legal Med 134(4):1519–1530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bellemare F, Fuamba T, Bourgeault A (2006) Sexual dimorphism of human ribs. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 150(2–3):233–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bellemare F, Jeanneret A, Couture J (2003) Sex differences in thoracic dimensions and configuration. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168(3):305–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lynch JJ, Cross P, Heaton V (2017) Sexual dimorphism of the first rib: a comparative approach using metric and geometric morphometric analyses. J Forensic Sci 62(5):1251–1258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. White TD, Black MT, Folkens PA (2011) Human osteology (3° Ed.). 3°. White TD, Black MT, Folkens PA, editors. Academic Press

  17. Davies-Barrett AM, Antoine D, Roberts CA (2019) Inflammatory periosteal reaction on ribs associated with lower respiratory tract disease: a method for recording prevalence from sites with differing preservation. Am J Phys Anthropol 168(3):530–542

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Partido Navadijo M, Fombuena Zapata I, Borja Miranda EA, Alemán Aguilera I (2021) Discriminant functions for sex estimation using the rib necks in a Spanish population. Int J Legal Med 135(3):1055–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cattaneo C, Mazzarelli D, Cappella A, Castoldi E, Mattia M, Poppa P et al (2018) A modern documented Italian identified skeletal collection of 2127 skeletons: the CAL Milano Cemetery Skeletal Collection. Forensic Sci Int 287:219.e1–219.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.03.041

  20. Ubelaker DH (2008) Issues in the global applications of methodology in forensic anthropology*. J Forensic Sci 53(3):606–7. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00717.x

  21. Francisco RA, Evison MP, da Costa Junior ML, Silveira TCP, Secchieri JM, Guimarães MA (2017) Validation of a standard forensic anthropology examination protocol by measurement of applicability and reliability on exhumed and archive samples of known biological attribution. Forensic Sci Int 279:241–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.08.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Christensen AM, Crowder CM (2009) Evidentiary standards for forensic anthropology. J Forensic Sci 54(6):1211–1216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Santos AL (2020) A particular heritage: the importance of identified osteological collections. Metode Sci Stud J 2020(10):91–97

    Google Scholar 

  24. Usher BM. Reference samples: the first step in linking biology and age in the human skeleton. In: Hoppa RD, Vaupel JW, editors. Paleodemography: age distributions from skeletal samples [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 29–47. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/paleodemography/reference-samples-the-first-step-in-linking-biology-and-age-in-the-human-skeleton/51F68DED21B31061C6269D4AEDFF08DB

  25. Petaros A, Caplova Z, Verna E, Adalian P, Baccino E, de Boer HH et al (2021) Technical Note: The Forensic Anthropology Society of Europe (FASE) map of identified osteological collections. Forensic Sci Int 328:110995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Santos AL (2000) A skeletal picture of tuberculosis: macroscopic, radiological, biomolecular and historical evidence from the Coimbra identified skeletal collection. [Coimbra]: Universidade de Coimbra

  27. Cunha E, Wasterlain S (2007) The Coimbra identified osteological collections. Skelet Ser Socioecon Context Documenta Archaeobiologiae 5:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ferreira MT, Vicente R, Navega D, Gonçalves D, Curate F, Cunha E (2014) A new forensic collection housed at the University of Coimbra, Portugal: the 21st century identified skeletal collection. Forensic Sci Int 245:202.e1–202.e5

  29. Ferreira MT, Coelho C, Makhoul C, Navega D, Gonçalves D, Cunha E et al (2021) New data about the 21st century identified skeletal collection (University of Coimbra, Portugal). Int J Legal Med 135(3):1087–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Scheuer L, Black SM (2004) The juvenile skeleton. Elsevier Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cunningham C, Scheuer L, Black S (2016) Developmental juvenile osteology. Developmental juvenile osteology: Second Edition. Elsevier Inc

  32. Cattaneo C (2007) Forensic anthropology: developments of a classical discipline in the new millennium. Forensic Sci Int 165(2–3):185–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lomauro A, Aliverti A (2018) Sex differences in respiratory function. Breathe 14(2):131–40. Available from: https://breathe.ersjournals.com/content/14/2/131

  34. Ratnovsky A, Elad D (2005) Anatomical model of the human trunk for analysis of respiratory muscles mechanics. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 148(3):245–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. García-Martínez D, Torres-Tamayo N, Torres-Sanchez I, García-Río F, Bastir M (2016) Morphological and functional implications of sexual dimorphism in the human skeletal thorax. Am J Phys Anthropol 161(3):467–77. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ajpa.23051

  36. Torres-Tamayo N, García-Martínez D, Lois Zlolniski S, Torres-Sánchez I, García-Río F, Bastir M (2018) 3D analysis of sexual dimorphism in size, shape and breathing kinematics of human lungs. J Anat 232(2):227–37. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/joa.12743

  37. Pimenta J, Lopes AM, Carracedo A, Arenas M, Amorim A, Comas D (2019) Spatially explicit analysis reveals complex human genetic gradients in the Iberian Peninsula. Sci Rep 9(1):1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Nadal J (1988) La población española (siglos XVI a XX). Nadal J, editor. Barcelona: Ariel

  39. Godinho V (1975) A estrutura da antiga sociedade Portuguesa. Godinho V, editor. Lisboa: Arcadia

  40. Rodrigues TF (2010) A populaçao portuguesa. Das longas permanencias à conquista da modernidade. In: Pereira MCM, editor. Populaçao e Sociedade: Dinâmicas e perspetivas demográficas do Portugal contemporaneo. Porto: CEPESE e Ediçoes Afrontamiento; p. 21–42

  41. Silva ÁF (1997) A evolução da rede urbana portuguesa (1801–1940). Anal Soc 32(143):779–814. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41011289?seq=1

  42. Vargas-Frías L, Sáinz-Otero A, Marín-Paz AJ (2018) Mortalidad por enfermedades carenciales e infecciosas digestivas en La Zubia (Granada) (1931–1945). TEMPERAMENTVM REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE HISTORIA Y PENSAMIENTO ENFERMERO 14:1–8. Available from: http://ciberindex.com/c/t/e12207

  43. Zoido Naranjo F, Arroyo Pérez A (2003) La población de España. In: VV.AA., editor. Tendencias demográficas durante el siglo XX en España. Sevilla: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Universidad de Sevilla

  44. Cardoso HFV (2008) Age estimation of adolescent and young adult male and female skeletons II, epiphyseal union at the upper limb and scapular girdle in a modern Portuguese skeletal sample. Am J Phys Anthropol 137(1):97–105. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ajpa.20850

  45. Martínez-Carrión JM (2011) La talla de los europeos desde 1700: Tendencias, ciclos y desigualdades. Sociedad Española de Historia Agraria

  46. Caballero B, Popkin B (2002) The nutrition transition. Diet and disease in the developing world. Academic Press

  47. Pereira MH (1978) Decadência» ou subdesenvolvimento: uma reinterpretação das suas origens no caso português. Anal Soc 14(53):7–20. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41010123

  48. Sideri S (1978) Comércio e Poder. Colonialismo informal nas relaçoes Anglo-Portuguesas. Cosmos, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ramos R, Vasconcelos e Sousa B, Monteiro NG (2009) História de Portugal. A Esfera dos Livros, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  50. León P (1982) História económica e social do mundo. Sá da Costa Editora, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  51. İşcan MY (1985) Osteometric analysis of sexual dimorphism in the sternal end of the rib. J Forensic Sci 30(4):1090–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Cöloğlu AS, Işcan MY, Yavuz MF, Sari H (1998) Sex determination from the ribs of contemporary Turks. J Forensic Sci 43(2):273–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9544535/

  53. Macaluso PJ, Rico A, Santos M, Lucena J (2012) Osteometric sex discrimination from the sternal extremity of the fourth rib in a recent forensic sample from Southwestern Spain. Forensic Sci Int 223(1–3):375.e1-375.e5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank EMUCESA, the company in charge of the San José Cemetery in Granada, as well as the Anthropology Laboratories of the University of Granada and the University of Coimbra for the access to the osteological material used for the present study, and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Funding

The author Manuel Partido Navadijo work is financed by the FPU Research and Teaching Fellowships (Formación de Profesorado Universitario), 2018 announcement, from the Ministry of Universities of the Government of Spain, ref. FPU18/00669. The co-author Maria Teresa Ferreira work falls within the scope of the R&D Unit Centre for Functional Ecology–Science for People and the Planet (CFE), with reference UIDB/04004/2020, financed by FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Partido Navadijo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 48 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Partido Navadijo, M., Monge Calleja, Á.M., Ferreira, M.T. et al. Validation of discriminant functions from the rib necks in two Portuguese adult identified populations. Int J Legal Med 137, 851–861 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-02957-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-02957-8

Keywords

Navigation