Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of forensically important sarcophagid flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) in China based on COI and period gene

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unequivocal identification of insect specimens is an essential requirement in forensic entomology. With the development of molecular identification, spate of discussions about the feature of the DNA fragments have been raised. Relying solely on single DNA fragment for delimiting closely related species is supposed to be dangerous. Aiming at obtaining more reliable markers that might be universally used, we explore the utility of 700-bp COI fragment and 678-bp period gene fragment in the identification of Sarcophagidae (Diptera). Thirty-six sarcophagid fly specimens were collected from 19 locations in 11 Chinese provinces. Phylogenetic analysis of the sequenced segments showed that all sarcophagid specimens were properly assigned into nine species with relatively strong supporting values, which indicated the possibility of separation congeneric species with COI and period gene fragments. The difference between intraspecific threshold and interspecific divergence confirmed that the combination of nuclear and mitochondrial genes for species identification is much more accurate. The results of this research will be instrumental for implementation of the Chinese Sarcophagidae database.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amendt J, Krettek R, Zehner R (2004) Forensic entomology. Naturwissenschaften 91:51–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hu C, Wang JF (2000) Diptera with forensic importance. In: Hu C, Min JX (eds) Forensic entomology. Chongqing, Chongqing, pp 96–160

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meng FM, Cai JF (2011) Insect with forensic importance. In: Cai JF (ed) Modern and practical forensic entomology. People’s Medical, Beijing, pp 37–60

    Google Scholar 

  4. Byrd JH, Castner JL (2001) Insects of forensic importance. In: Byrd JH, Castner JL (eds) Forensic entomology: utility of arthropods in legal investigation. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 43–80

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wells JD, Pape T, Sperling FAH (2001) DNA-based identification and molecular systematics of forensically important Sarcophagidae. J Forensic Sci 46:1098–1102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pohjoisma¨ki JLO, Karhunen PJ, Goebeler S, Saukko P, Sa¨a¨ksja¨rvi IE (2010) Indoors forensic entomology: colonization of human remains in closed environments by specific species of sarcosaprophagous flies. Forensic Sci Int 199:38–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mulieri PR, Mariluis JC, Aballay FH (2012) Two species of Microcerella (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) found in highland arid landscapes of Argentina, during forensic studies. J Med Entomol 49:183–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cherix D, Wyss C, Pape T (2012) Occurrences of flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) on human cadavers in Switzerland, and their importance as forensic indicators. Forensic Sci Int 220:156–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pape T (1996) Catalogue of the Sarcophagidae of the world (Insecta: Diptera). Associated Publishers, Gainesville

  10. Lu BL, Wu HY (2003) Classification and identification of important medical insects of China. Henan science and technology, Zhengzhou

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith KGV (1986) A manual of forensic entomology. The Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wells JD, Stevens JR (2008) Application of DNA-based methods in forensic entomology. Annu Rev Entomol 53:103–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meiklejohn KA, Wallman JF, Dowton M (2013) DNA barcoding identifies all immature life stages of a forensically important flesh fly (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). J Forensic Sci 58:184–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jordaens K, Sonet G, Richet R, Dupont E, Braet Y, Desmyter S (2013) Identification of forensically important Sarcophaga species (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) using the mitochondrial COI gene. Int J Legal Med 127:491–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meiklejohn KA, Wallman JF, Dowton M (2011) DNA-based identification of forensically important Australian Sarcophagidae (Diptera). Int J Leg Med 125:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tan SH, Rizman-Idid M, Mohd-Aris E, Kurahashi H, Mohamed Z (2010) DNA-based characterisation and classification of forensically important flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) in Malaysia. Forensic Sci Int 199:43–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Harvey ML, Dadour IR, Gaudieri S (2003) Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene: potential for distinction between immature stages of some forensically important fly species (Diptera) in western Australia. Forensic Sci Int 131:134–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zehner R, Amendt J, Schütt S, Sauer J, Krettek R, Povolný S (2004) Genetic identification of forensically important flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Int J Legal Med 118:245–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ames C, Turner B, Daniel B (2006) The use of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene (COI) to differentiate two UK blowfly species—Calliphora vicina and Calliphora Vomitoria. Forensic Sci Int 164:179–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Desmyter S, Gosselin M (2009) COI sequence variability between Chrysomyinae of forensic interest. Forensic Sci Int Genet 3:89–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo YD, Cai JF, Meng FM, Chang YF, Gu Y, Lan LM, Liang L, Wen JF (2012) Identification of forensically important flesh flies based on a shorter fragment of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene in China. Med Vet Entomol 26:307–313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stevens JR, Wall R, Wells JD (2007) Paraphyly in Hawaiian hybrid blowfly populations and the evolutionary history of anthropophilic species. Insect Mol Biol 11:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wells JD, Wall R, Stevens JR (2007) Phylogenetic analysis of forensically important Lucilia flies based on cytochrome oxidase I: a cautionary tale for forensic species determination. Int J Leg Med 121:229–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zaidi F, Wei SJ, Shi M, Chen XX (2011) Utility of multi-gene loci for forensic species diagnosis of blowflies. J Insect Sci 11:59

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nelson LA, Wallman JF, Dowton M (2007) Using COI barcodes to identify forensically and medically important blowflies. Med Vet Entomol 21:44–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nelson LA, Wallman JF, Dowton M (2008) Identification of forensically important Chrysomya (Diptera: Calliphoridae) species using the second ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS2). Forensic Sci Int 177:238–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Guo YD, Cai JF, Chang YF, Li X, Liu QL, Wang XH et al (2011) Identification of forensically important sarcophagid flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) in China, based on COI and 16S rDNA gene sequences. J Forensic Sci 56:1534–1540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Konopka RJ, Benzer S (1971) Clock mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 68:2112–2116

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bradshaw W, Holzapfel C (2007) Tantalizing timeless. Science 316:1851–1852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Giebultowicz JM (2000) Molecular mechanism and cellular distribution of insect circadian clock. Annu Rev Entomol 45:769–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kosˇta’l V, Za’vodska’ R, Denlinger D (2009) Clock genes period and timeless are rhythmically expressed in brains of newly hatched, photosensitive larvae of the fly, Sarcophaga crassipalpis. J Insect Physiol 55:408–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Roe AD, Sperling FAH (2007) Patterns of evolution of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I and II DNA and implications for DNA barcoding. Mol Phylogenet Evol 44:325–345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tourle R, Downie DA, Villet MH (2009) A morphological and molecular comparison of Lucilia cuprina and L. sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in South Africa. Med Vet Entomol 23:6–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Amendt J, Campobasso CP, Gaudry E, Reiter C, LeBlanc HN, Hall MJR (2007) Best practice in forensic entomology—standards and guidelines. Int J Legal Med 121:90–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Baqué M, Amendt J (2013) Strengthen forensic entomology in court—the need for data exploration and the validation of a generalised additive mixed model. Int J Legal Med 127:213–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu WQ, Zhao JM (1996) Flies of China. Liaoning Science and Technology, Shenyang

    Google Scholar 

  37. Guo YD, Cai JF, Su RN, Chang YF, Lan LM, Wen JF (2010) Comparison of mtDNA extraction from different parts of sarcosaphagous insects. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi 26:336–339

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Han B, Denlinger DL (2009) Length variation in a specific region of the period gene correlates with differences in pupal diapause incidence in the flesh fly, Sarcophaga bullata. J Insect Physiol 55:415–418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S (2004) Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:11030–11035

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Vanin S, Gherardi M, Bugelli V, Di Paolo M (2011) Insects found on a human cadaver in central Italy including the blowfly Calliphora loewi, (Diptera, Calliphoridae), a new species of forensic interest. Forensic Sci Int 207:E30–E33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, no. 81302615), Science Foundation for The Youth Scholars of Central South University (no.120959), and Central South University student innovation test plan (2282013bks070). Yadong Guo is a postdoctoral fellow of School of Basic Medical Sciences. Thanks to all the members of the forensic interest community of Central South University for samples collection. We also thank Prof. SONG Dong-Bao and Ph.D. HUANG Guo-Hua (Plant Protection Department, College of Bio-safety Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University) for identifications of insects.

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to LiXiang Wu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 118 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guo, Y., Zha, L., Yan, W. et al. Identification of forensically important sarcophagid flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) in China based on COI and period gene. Int J Legal Med 128, 221–228 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-013-0923-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-013-0923-7

Keywords

Navigation