Abstract
The utility of the forensically important Sarcophagidae (Diptera) for time since death estimates has been severely limited, as morphological identification is difficult and thermobiological histories are inadequately documented. A molecular identification method involving the sequencing of a 658-bp ‘barcode’ fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene from 85 specimens, representing 16 Australian species from varying populations, was evaluated. Nucleotide sequence divergences were calculated using the Kimura-two-parameter distance model and a neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree generated. All species were resolved as reciprocally monophyletic, except Sarcophaga dux. Intraspecific and interspecific variation ranged from 0.000% to 1.499% (SE = 0.044%) and 6.658% to 8.983% (SE = 0.653%), respectively. The COI ‘barcode’ sequence was found to be suitable for the molecular identification of the studied Australian Sarcophagidae: 96.5% of the examined specimens were assigned to the correct species. Given that the sarcophagid fauna is poorly described, it is feasible that the few incorrectly assigned specimens represent cryptic species. The results of this research will be instrumental for implementation of the Australian Sarcophagidae in forensic entomology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amendt J, Krettek R, Zehner R (2004) Forensic entomology. Naturwissenschaften 91:51–65
Catts EP (1992) Problems in estimating the postmortem interval in death investigations. J Agric Entomol 9:245–255
Catts EP, Goff ML (1992) Forensic entomology in criminal investigations. Annu Rev Entomol 37:253–272
Wells JD, Pape T, Sperling FAH (2001) DNA-based identification and molecular systematics of forensically important Sarcophagidae (Diptera). J Forensic Sci 46:1098–1102
Pape T (1996) Catalogue of the Sarcophagidae of the world (Insecta: Diptera). Associated Publishers, Gainesville
Shewell GE (1987) Sarcophagidae. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa
Greenberg B (1991) Flies as forensic indicators. J Med Entomol 28:565–577
Byrd JH, Castner JL (2001) Insects of forensic importance. CRC, Boca Raton
Kamal AS (1958) Comparative study of thirteen species of sarcosaprophagous Calliphoridae and Sarcophagidae (Diptera). Ann Entomol Soc Am 51:261–271
Zehner R, Amendt J, Schutt S, Sauer J, Krettek R, Povolny D (2004) Genetic identification of forensically important flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Int J Legal Med 118:245–247
Wells JD, Williams DW (2007) Validation of a DNA-based method for identifying Chrysomyinae (Diptera: Calliphoridae) used in a death investigation. Int J Legal Med 121:1–8
Nelson LA, Wallman JF, Dowton M (2007) Using COI barcodes to identify forensically and medically important blowflies. Med Vet Entomol 21:44–52
Lopes HdS (1959) A revision of Australian Sarcophagidae (Diptera). Studia Ent 2:33–67
Lopes HdS (1954) Contribution to the knowledge of the Australian sarcophagid flies belonging to the genus "Tricholioproctia" Baranov, 1938 (Diptera). An Acad Bras Cienc 26:234–276
Sunnucks P, Hales DF (1996) Numerous transposed sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I-II in aphids of the genus Sitobion (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Mol Biol Evol 13:510–524
Platt AR, Woodhall RW, George AL Jr (2007) Improved DNA sequencing quality and efficiency using an optimised fast cycle sequencing protocol. Biotechniques 43:58–62
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98
Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN (2007) BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System (www.barcodinglife.org). Mol Ecol Notes 7:355–364
Kimura M (1980) A simple model for estimating the evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120
Swofford DL (2001) PAUP*-Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425
Ball SL, Hebert PDN, Burian SK, Webb JM (2005) Biological identifications of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) using DNA barcodes. J North Am Benthol Soc 24:508–524
Foottit RG, Maw HEL, Von Dohlen CD, Hebert PDN (2008) Species identification of aphids (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae) through DNA barcodes. Mol Ecol Resour 8:1189–1201
Hajibabaei M, Janzen D, Burns J, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN (2006) DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:968–971
Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:313–321
Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard JR (2003) Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:s96–s99
Ward R, Zemalk T, Innes B, Last P, Hebert PDN (2005) DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:1847–1857
Smith MA, Woodley NE, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN (2006) DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:3657–3662
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge Melanie Archer, Kelly George, Steve and Ruth McKillup and Lisa Mingari for providing specimens. We are grateful to the Australian Biological Resources Study (ABRS) for their financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meiklejohn, K.A., Wallman, J.F. & Dowton, M. DNA-based identification of forensically important Australian Sarcophagidae (Diptera). Int J Legal Med 125, 27–32 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0395-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0395-y