Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Skin ionocyte density of amphibious killifishes is shaped by phenotypic plasticity and constitutive interspecific differences

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When amphibious fishes are on land, gill function is reduced or eliminated and the skin is hypothesized to act as a surrogate site of ionoregulation. Skin ionocytes are present in many fishes, particularly those with amphibious life histories. We used nine closely related killifishes spanning a range of amphibiousness to first test the hypothesis that amphibious killifishes have evolved constitutively increased skin ionocyte density to promote ionoregulation on land. We found that skin ionocyte densities were constitutively higher in five of seven amphibious species examined relative to exclusively water-breathing species when fish were prevented from leaving water, strongly supporting our hypothesis. Next, to examine the scope for plasticity, we tested the hypothesis that skin ionocyte density in amphibious fishes would respond plastically to air-exposure to promote ionoregulation in terrestrial environments. We found that air-exposure induced plasticity in skin ionocyte density only in the two species classified as highly amphibious, but not in moderately amphibious species. Specifically, skin ionocyte density significantly increased in Anablepsoides hartii (168%) and Kryptolebias marmoratus (37%) following a continuous air-exposure, and only in K. marmoratus (43%) following fluctuating air-exposure. Collectively, our data suggest that highly amphibious killifishes have evolved both increased skin ionocyte density as well as skin that is more responsive to air-exposure compared to exclusively water-breathing and less amphibious species. Our findings are consistent with the idea that gaining the capacity for cutaneous ionoregulation is a key evolutionary step that enables amphibious fishes to survive on land.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets associated with this study have been placed in the University of Guelph Research Data Repository and are available at https://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/KGT8NE upon request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Andreas Heyland for the use of his microscope. Dr. Graham Scott for the donation of Fundulus heteroclitus and suggestions on study design, and Dr. Jonathan Wilson for guidance with histological analyses. In addition, we thank Mike Davies, Matt Cornish, and numerous undergraduates for assistance with animal care.

Funding

This work was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery grant to PAW (RGPIN-2018-04218). LT was awarded an NSERC graduate scholarship and an Ontario graduate scholarship. AJT was supported by an NSERC postdoctoral fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to study conceptualization. LT conducted the experiments, analyzed the data (with phylogenetic statistical assistance from AJT), prepared figures, and wrote the draft manuscript. All authors edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia A. Wright.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

All our animal protocols were approved by the University of Guelph Animal Care Committee (protocols 3992 and 3891).

Additional information

Communicated by B. Pelster.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 4457 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tunnah, L., Turko, A.J. & Wright, P.A. Skin ionocyte density of amphibious killifishes is shaped by phenotypic plasticity and constitutive interspecific differences. J Comp Physiol B 192, 701–711 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-022-01457-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-022-01457-2

Keywords

Navigation