Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of limited english proficiency on prostate-specific antigen screening in American men

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate how limited English proficiency (LEP) impacts the prevalence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in a contemporary, nationally representative cohort of men in the USA.

Methods

The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey was utilized to identify the prevalence of PSA screening between 2013 and 2016 among men ≥ 55. Men who speak a language other than English at home were stratified by self-reported levels of English proficiency (men who speak English very well, well, not well, or not at all). Survey weights were applied, and groups were compared using the adjusted Wald test. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of PSA screening adjusting for patient-level covariates.

Results

The cohort included 2,889 men, corresponding to a weighted estimate of 4,765,682 men. 79.6% of men who speak English very well reported receiving at least one lifetime PSA test versus 58.4% of men who do not speak English at all (p < 0.001). Men who reported not speaking English at all had significantly lower prevalence of PSA screening (aOR 0.56; 95% CI 0.35–0.91; p = 0.019). Other significant predictors of PSA screening included older age, income > 400% of the federal poverty level, insurance coverage, and healthcare utilization.

Conclusions

Limited English proficiency is associated with significantly lower prevalence of PSA screening among men in the USA. Interventions to mitigate disparities in prostate cancer outcomes should account for limited English proficiency among the barriers to guideline-concordant care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data underlying this article are available on request to the senior author. The datasets were derived from sources in the public domain (The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, https://meps.ahrq.gov).

References

  1. Foiles Sifuentes AM, Robledo Cornejo M, Li NC, Castaneda-Avila MA, Tjia J, Lapane KL (2020) The role of limited english proficiency and access to health insurance and health care in the affordable care act era. Health Equity 4(1):509. https://doi.org/10.1089/HEQ.2020.0057

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Skube ME, Alexander BH, Beilman G, Tuttle TM (2018) Impact of patient’s primary language on stage of cancer at diagnosis. J Am Coll Surg 227(4):e162. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAMCOLLSURG.2018.08.442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Section 1557 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act | HHS.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/section-1557/index.html. Accessed 16 Nov 2022

  4. Advancing Equity at HHS | HHS.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/equity/index.html. Accessed 16 Nov 2022

  5. Cohen JW, Cohen SB, Banthin JS (2009) The medical expenditure panel survey. Med Care 47(7_Supplement_1):S44–S50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0B013E3181A23E3A

  6. Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK et al (2018) Screening for prostate cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 319(18):1901–1913. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2018.3710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carter HB, Albertsen PC, Barry MJ et al (2013) Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol 190(2):419. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JURO.2013.04.119

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey computing standard errors for MEPS estimates. Accessed 13 Sept 2022. https://meps.ahrq.gov/survey_comp/standard_errors.jsp

  9. Increase the proportion of adults with limited English proficiency who say their providers explain things clearly—HC/HIT-D11—Healthy People 2030 | health.gov. https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/health-communication/increase-proportion-adults-limited-english-proficiency-who-say-their-providers-explain-things-clearly-hchit-d11. Accessed 21 Nov 2022

  10. Ramirez N, Shi K, Yabroff KR, Han X, Fedewa SA, Nogueira LM (2022) Access to care among adults with limited english proficiency. J Gen Intern Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11606-022-07690-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunn AS, Shridharani KV, Lou W, Bernstein J, Horowitz CR (2001) Physician-patient discussions of controversial cancer screening tests. Am J Prev Med 20(2):130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00288-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Trinh QD, Li H, Meyer CP et al (2016) Determinants of cancer screening in Asian-Americans. Cancer Causes Control 27(8):989–998. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10552-016-0776-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansen NF, Linscott JA, Hayn MH, Ryan ST, Sammon JD (2022) Prostate specific antigen testing behaviors for prostate cancer screening among US immigrants: a cross-sectional analysis using the National Health Interview Survey. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by BS, ML, DF, EB, and SL. The first draft of the manuscript was written by BS, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Quoc-Dien Trinh.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

ASF reports consulting fees from Janssen, Olympus, Urogen, Lantheus, stock options from Vessi Medical and Scentient, and research funding from Convergent Genomics and NIH. ASK reports consulting fees from Profound, Janssen, Merck, Bayer, Cellvax, Candel, Bristle-Meyer Squibb. QDT reports consulting fees from Astellas, Bayer, and Janssen outside the submitted work and research funding from the American Cancer Society and Pfizer Global Medical Grants. APC reports research funding from the American Cancer Society and Pfizer Global Medical Grants. The other co-authors report no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval

All data used were publicly available and de-identified and deemed exempt by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 17 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stone, B.V., Labban, M., Beatrici, E. et al. The effect of limited english proficiency on prostate-specific antigen screening in American men. World J Urol 42, 54 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04725-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04725-0

Keywords

Navigation