Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reduziert die Manipulation die Behinderung von Patienten mit akutem unspezifischem Kreuzschmerz besser als Diclofenac?

Does manipulation reduce the handicap of patients with acute nonspecific low back pain better than diclofenac?

  • Kommentar
  • Published:
Manuelle Medizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P et al (1996) Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Phys Ther 76:359–365

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ostelo RWJG, Vet HCW de, Knol DL, Brandt PA van den (2004) 24-item Roland-Morris disability questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 57:268–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiesinger GF, Nuhr M, Quittan M et al (1999) Cross-cultural adaptation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire for German-speaking patients with low back pain. Spine 24:1099–2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL, Guyatt GH (1998) Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris back pain questionnaire: part 1. Phys Ther 78:1186–1196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tulder M van, Malmivaara A, Hayden J, Koes B (2007) Statistical significance versus clinical importance. trials on exercise therapy for chronic low back pain as example. Spine 32:1785–1790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T et al (2006) European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 2):169–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rudwaleit M, Heijde D van der, Landewe‘ R et al (2009) The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 68:777–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Roelofs PDDM, Deyo RA, Koes BW et al (2008) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD000396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schattenkirchner M, Milachowski KA (2003) A double-blind, multicentre, randomised clinical trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of aceclofenac with diclofenac resinate in patients with acute low back pain. Clin Rheumatol 22(2):127–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Agrifoglio E, Benvenutti M, Gatto P et al (1994) Aceclofenac: a new NSAID in the treatment of acute lumbago. Multicentre single blind study vs. diclofenac. Acta Therapeutica 20:33–43

    Google Scholar 

  11. Colberg K, HettichM, Sigmund R, Degner FL (1996) The efficacy and tolerability of an 8-day administration of intravenous and oral meloxicam: a comparison with intramuscular and oral diclofenac in patients with acute lumbago. German Meloxicam Ampoule Study Group. Curr Med Res Opin 13:363–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dreiser RL, Le Parc JM, Velicitat P, Lleu PL (2001) Oral meloxicam is effective in acute sciatica: two randomised, double-blind trials versus placebo or diclofenac. Inflamm Res 50(1):S17–S23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuhlwein A, Meyer HJ, Koehler CO (1990) Reduced diclofenac administration by B vitamins: results of a randomized double-blind study with reduced daily doses of diclofenac (75 mg diclofenac versus 75 mg diclofenac plus B vitamins) in acute lumbar vertebral syndromes. Klin Wochenschr 68:107–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ximenes A, Robles M, Sands G, Vinueza R (2007) Valdecoxib is as efficacious as diclofenac in the treatment of acute low back pain. Clin J Pain 23(3):244–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hancock MJ, Maher CG, Latimer J et al (2007) Assessment of diclofenac or spinal manipulative therapy, or both, in addition to recommended first-line treatment for acute low back pain: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 370:1638–1643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubinstein SM, Terwee CB, Assendelft WJJ et al (2013) Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low back pain. An update of the Cochrane review. Spine 38:E158–E177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lougee H, Johnston RG, Thomson OP (2013) The suitability of sham treatments for use as placebo controls in trials of spinal manipulative therapy: a pilot study. J Bodyw Mov Ther 17(1):59–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Michener LA, Kardouni JR, Lopes Albers AD, Ely JM (2013) Development of a sham comparator for thoracic spinal manipulative therapy for use with shoulder disorders. Man Ther 18:60–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vernon HT, Triano JJ, Ross JK et al (2012) Validation of a novel sham cervical manipulation procedure. Spine J 12:1021–1028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heymann WJ von et al (2013) Spinal high-velocity low amplitude manipulation in acute nonspecific low back pain. a double-blinded randomized controlled trial in comparison with diclofenac and placebo. Spine 38:540–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Heymann W von (2013) Vergleich chirotherapeutischer Manipulation mit Diclofenac- und Placebobehandlung bei akuter, nichtspezifischer Lumbalgie. Prospektiv-randomisierte Doppelblindstudie der MWE. Man Med 51 (im Druck)

Download references

Einhaltung der ethischen Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. -, Andergase 83, 1170, Wien, Österreich

    K. Ammer PhD

Authors
  1. K. Ammer PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Ammer PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ammer, K. Reduziert die Manipulation die Behinderung von Patienten mit akutem unspezifischem Kreuzschmerz besser als Diclofenac?. Manuelle Medizin 51, 313–316 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00337-013-1046-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00337-013-1046-4

Search

Navigation