Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ankylosing spondylitis causes high burden to patients and the healthcare system: results from a German claims database analysis

  • Public Health
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To compare healthcare resource utilization and costs between ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients and a matched sample from the general population without AS covered by the German Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) system, a non-interventional retrospectively matched cohort analysis was conducted using anonymized SHI claims data. Data from January 1st, 2011 through December 31st, 2014 were analyzed. Individuals with a coded diagnosis of AS during the enrollment period comprising the full year of 2013 were directly matched (1:5) to individuals without AS diagnosis in the whole study period by age, gender, hospitalizations, and comorbidities. All-cause healthcare resource utilization and direct costs were analyzed for the year 2013. Statistical tests were applied to compare the differences between the two sampled populations. In 2013, 10,208 AS patients were identified and matched to a sample of 51,040 patients without AS from the general population. Healthcare resource utilization was significantly higher in all healthcare sectors (inpatient, outpatient, pharmaceuticals, remedies, devices and aids, and sick leave) in the AS cohort. Mean all-cause healthcare costs per patient were about €2475 higher in the AS cohort compared to the general population. Most important cost drivers were hospitalizations and pharmaceuticals in terms of bDMARDs prescribed in 10% of the patients. Real-world data from this German claims database analysis showed that AS is associated with a substantial incremental economic burden to the healthcare system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boonen A, van der Linden SM (2006) The burden of ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol Suppl 78:4–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Braun J, Pincus T (2002) Mortality, course of disease and prognosis of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 20(6; SUPP/28):S–S16

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zink A, Braun J, Listing J, Wollenhaupt J (2000) Disability and handicap in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis-results from the German rheumatological database. German Collaborative Arthritis Centers. J Rheumatol 27:613–622

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sieper J, Poddubnyy D (2017) Axial spondyloarthritis. Lancet 390(10089):73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31591-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kiltz U, Braun J (2013) Evidenzbasierte Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh) und der beteiligten medizinisch-wissenschaftlichen Fachgesellschaften und weiterer Organisationen

  6. Shaikh SA (2007) Ankylosing spondylitis: recent breakthroughs in diagnosis and treatment. J Can Chiropr Assoc 51:249–260

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Braun J, Bollow M, Remlinger G, Eggens U, Rudwaleit M, Distler A, Sieper J (1998) Prevalence of spondylarthropathies in HLA-B27 positive and negative blood donors. Arthritis Rheum 41:58–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Exarchou S, Lindström U, Askling J, Eriksson JK, Forsblad-d’Elia H, Neovius M, Turesson C, Kristensen LE, Jacobsson LT (2015) The prevalence of clinically diagnosed ankylosing spondylitis and its clinical manifestations: a nationwide register study. Arthritis Res Ther 17(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haroon NN, Paterson JM, Li P, Haroon N (2014) Increasing proportion of female patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a population-based study of trends in the incidence and prevalence of AS. BMJ Open 4(12):e006634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boonen A, Chorus A, Miedema H, van Der Heijde D, van Der Tempel H, Van der Linden S (2001) Employment, work disability, and work days lost in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a cross sectional study of Dutch patients. Ann Rheum Dis 60(4):353–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sieper J, Braun J, Rudwaleit M, Boonen A, Zink A (2002) Ankylosing spondylitis: an overview. Ann Rheum Dis 61:iii8–iii18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boonen A (2002) Ankylosing spondylitis: what is the cost to society, and can it be reduced? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 16(4):691–705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dougados M, Dijkmans B, Khan M, Maksymowych W, van der Linden SJ, Brandt J (2002) Conventional treatments for ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 61:iii40–iii50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. van der Heijde D, Ramiro S, Landewé R, Baraliakos X, Van den Bosch F, Sepriano A, Regel A, Ciurea A, Dagfinrud H, Dougados M, van Gaalen F, Géher P, van der Horst-Bruinsma I, Inman RD, Jongkees M, Kiltz U, Kvien TK, Machado PM, Marzo-Ortega H, Molto A, Navarro-Compàn V, Ozgocmen S, Pimentel-Santos FM, Reveille J, Rudwaleit M, Sieper J, Sampaio-Barros P, Wiek D, Braun J (2017) 2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210770

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Baeten D, Sieper J, Braun J, Baraliakos X, Dougados M, Emery P, Deodhar A, Porter B, Martin R, Andersson M, Mpofu S, Richards HB, Group MS, Group MS (2015) Secukinumab, an Interleukin-17A Inhibitor, in ankylosing spondylitis. N Engl J Med 373(26):2534–2548. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1505066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2016) TNF-alpha inhibitors for ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (TA383). Technology appraisal guidance. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Franke L, Ament A, Laar M, Boonen A, Severens J (2009) Cost-of-illness of rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 27(4, Suppl. 55):118–123

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reveille JD, Ximenes A, Ward MM (2012) Economic considerations of the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Am J Med Sci 343(5):371–374. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3182514093

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Palla I, Trieste L, Tani C, Talarico R, Cortesi PA, Mosca M, Turchetti G (2012) A systematic literature review of the economic impact of ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 30(4 Suppl 73):S136–S141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Andersohn F, Walker J (2016) Characteristics and external validity of the German Health Risk Institute (HRI) database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 25(1):106–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Statistisches Bundesamt (2017) DESTATIS Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit, Bevölkerung mit Migrationshindergrund, Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2013

  23. Huscher D, Thiele K, Rudwaleit M, Albrecht KC, Bischoff S, Krause A, Karberg K, Wassenberg S, Zink A (2015) Trends in treatment and outcomes of ankylosing spondylitis in outpatient rheumatological care in Germany between 2000 and 2012. RMD Open 1(1):e000033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gran J, Husby G, Hordvik M (1985) Prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis in males and females in a young middle-aged population of Tromso, northern Norway. Ann Rheum Dis 44:359–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. van der Linden SM, Valkenburg HA, de Jongh BM, Cats A (1984) The risk of developing ankylosing spondylitis in HLA-B27 positive individuals. Arthritis Rheum 27(3):241–249

    Google Scholar 

  26. Feldtkeller E (1999) Age at disease onset and delayed diagnosis of spondyloarthropathies. Z Rheumatol 58(1):21–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dincer U, Cakar E, Kiralp MZ, Dursun H (2008) Diagnosis delay in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: possible reasons and proposals for new diagnostic criteria. Clin Rheumatol 27(4):457–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Baser O, Burkan A, Baser E, Koselerli R, Ertugay E, Altinbas A (2013) Health care costs associated with ankylosing spondylitis in Turkey: an analysis from nationwide real-world data. Int J Rheumatol 2013:139608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Keat AC, Gaffney K, Gilbert AK, Harris C, Leeder J (2008) Influence of biologic therapy on return to work in people with work disability due to ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology 47(4):481–483. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ken010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schett G, Coates LC, Ash ZR, Finzel S, Conaghan PG (2011) Structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis: traditional views, novel insights gained from TNF blockade, and concepts for the future. Arthritis Res Ther 13(Suppl 1):S4

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (2013) Axiale Spondyloarthritis inklusive Morbus Bechterew und Frühformen—Langfassung zur S3—Leitlinie. AWMF-Leitlinien Register Nummer: 060/003, Entwicklungsstufe: S3 Version: November 2013

  32. Huscher D, Merkesdal S, Thiele K, Zeidler H, Schneider M, Zink A (2006) Cost of illness in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus in Germany. Ann Rheum Dis 65(9):1175–1183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang BC, Tan CH, Furnback W, Ney JP, Yang YW, Fang CH, Chen WS (2015) Disease burden of ankylosing spondylitis in Taiwan: a population-based analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 74(512):FRI0242

    Google Scholar 

  34. Greß S (2007) Private health insurance in Germany: consequences of a dual system. Healthc Policy 3(2):29–37

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathrin Borchert.

Appendix

Appendix

Codes used for the identification of comorbidities, manifestations, and AS-related prescriptions

Description

Codes for identification

Comorbidities and manifestations

ICD-10-GM codes

Dactylitis

L08.9

Enthesitis

M76*, M77*

Monoarthritis

M13.1

Polyarthritis

M13.0

Fibromyalgia

M79.7

Sacroiliitis

M46.1

Psoriasis

L40*, L41*

Psoriatic arthritis, overall

M07*

Psoriatic arthritis

M07.0*–M07.3*, M09.0*

Acute anterior uveitis /iridocyclitis

H20.0*

Crohn’s disease

K50*

Ulcerative colitis

K51*

AS-related pharmaceuticals

ATC codes

NSAIDs

M01AA*-C*, M01AE*, M01AG*, M01AH*, N02BA01

Sulfasalazines

M01CX02

bDMARDs

L04AB01-2, L04AB04-6

Glucocorticoids

H02AB*

Opioids

N02A*

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krüger, K., von Hinüber, U., Meier, F. et al. Ankylosing spondylitis causes high burden to patients and the healthcare system: results from a German claims database analysis. Rheumatol Int 38, 2121–2131 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4124-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4124-z

Keywords

Navigation