Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of massive ascites on ramucirumab pharmacokinetics in patients with gastrointestinal cancers: a population pharmacokinetic analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Considerable amounts of injected immunoglobulin G-based therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, such as ramucirumab, are distributed into ascites. This study aimed to examine the effect of massive ascites on ramucirumab pharmacokinetics in patients with gastrointestinal cancers.

Methods

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of ramucirumab was performed using data on serum ramucirumab concentrations of 52 patients with gastrointestinal cancers, including 8 patients with massive ascites. The Bayesian method using the final population pharmacokinetic model was utilized to estimate trough ramucirumab concentrations after the first dose and at steady state.

Results

Population pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that massive ascites as well as body weight were influencing factors for ramucirumab clearance. The estimated ramucirumab clearance was significantly higher in patients with massive ascites than in those with no/mild ascites (0.020 ± 0.004 versus 0.013 ± 0.004 L/h, P < 0.001). The estimated trough ramucirumab concentrations were significantly lower in patients with massive ascites than in those with no/mild ascites after the first dose (26.4 ± 6.8 versus 36.1 ± 7.1 μg/mL, P < 0.001) and at steady state (41.4 ± 16.3 versus 65.9 ± 18.0 μg/mL, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

In the present study, the presence of massive ascites affected the pharmacokinetics of ramucirumab in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Our results suggest that dose optimization of ramucirumab may be necessary in patients with massive ascites due to higher ramucirumab clearance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The study data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Fuchs CS, Tomasek J, Yong CJ et al (2014) Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 383:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61719-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E et al (2014) Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1224–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70420-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Iwasa S, Bando H, Piao Y et al (2022) The clinical position of ramucirumab-containing regimens for advanced gastric cancer: a review of clinical trial data. Futur Oncol 18:2709–2721. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2022-0281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. European medicines agency (EMA) (2022) Cyramza-epar product information. http://www.ema.europa.eu. Accessed 4 Mar, 2023

  5. Tabernero J, Ohtsu A, Muro K et al (2017) Exposure-response analyses of ramucirumab from two randomized, phase III trials of second-line treatment for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 16:2215–2223. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Brien L, Westwood P, Gao L, Heathman M (2017) Population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis of ramucirumab in cancer patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 83:2741–2751. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cavazzoni E, Bugiantella W, Graziosi L et al (2013) Malignant ascites: pathophysiology and treatment. Int J Clin Oncol 18:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-012-0396-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Becker G, Galandi D, Blum HE (2006) Malignant ascites: systematic review and guideline for treatment. Eur J Cancer 42:589–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2005.11.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaneko T, Doki K, Yamada T et al (2021) Bevacizumab distribution into ascitic fluid decreases serum drug exposure. Ther Drug Monit 43:813–814. https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaneko T, Doki K, Yamada T et al (2022) Distribution of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies into ascites in advanced gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis: case reports and literature review. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 90:421–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-022-04479-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsumoto H, Kawazoe A, Shimada K et al (2018) A retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus ramucirumab in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with ascites. BMC Cancer 18:120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4057-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakajima TE, Yamaguchi K, Boku N et al (2020) Randomized phase II/III study of 5-fluorouracil/l-leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil/l-leucovorin plus paclitaxel administered to patients with severe peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer (JCOG1108/WJOG7312G). Gastric Cancer 23:677–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01043-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tabernero J, Ohtsu A, Muro K et al (2015) Exposure-response (E-R) relationship of ramucirumab (RAM) from two global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies of patients (Pts) with advanced second-line gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 33:abstr121. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.33.3_suppl.121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim TY, Yen CJ, Al-Batran SE et al (2018) Exposure–response relationship of ramucirumab in East Asian patients from RAINBOW: a randomized clinical trial in second-line treatment of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 21:276–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0737-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohn AL, Yoshino T, Heinemann V et al (2017) Exposure–response relationship of ramucirumab in patients with advanced second-line colorectal cancer: exploratory analysis of the RAISE trial. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 80:599–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3380-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. de Wit R, Powles T, Castellano D et al (2022) Exposure-response relationship of ramucirumab in RANGE, a randomized phase III trial in advanced urothelial carcinoma refractory to platinum therapy. Br J Clin Pharmacol 88:3182–3192. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smit EF, Garon EB, Reck M et al (2018) Exposure–response relationship for ramucirumab from the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 REVEL trial (docetaxel versus docetaxel plus ramucirumab) in second-line treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 82:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-018-3560-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (Grant No. 22K06718) awarded to K. Doki by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kosuke Doki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of University of Tsukuba Hospital (ethical approval No. R01-343).

Consent to participate

Written informed consent to participate was obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 66 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaneko, T., Doki, K., Yamada, T. et al. Effect of massive ascites on ramucirumab pharmacokinetics in patients with gastrointestinal cancers: a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 92, 271–278 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04568-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04568-x

Keywords

Navigation