Skip to main content
Log in

Eight-year comparison of agroeconomic benefits of open ditch and subsurface pipe drainage in mulched drip irrigated saline–sodic farmland

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because of the presence of shallow water tables and consequent secondary salinization in irrigated areas of Xinjiang China, there is an urgent need for installation of drainage systems to control the salinity levels in the crop rootzone. The goal of this study was to compare the midterm effects of the open ditch (depth of 2.2 m) and subsurface pipe (depth of 2.2 m) drainages on soil salinity, drainage, groundwater, cotton biomass, yield, and economic benefits while using drip irrigation under mulch (plastic film). We conducted a field experiment for eight consecutive years (2012–2019) in Shawan County of Xinjiang, China. Our experimental results indicated that open ditch and subsurface pipe drainages each reduced total soil salinity, improved saline–sodic soils, and controlled groundwater level, which caused a significant increase in the cotton biomass and yield. The open ditch drainage treatment (ODDA) represented a better desalination effect than the subsurface pipe drainage treatment (SPDA) at 73% and 81%, respectively. The electrical conductivity and pH of ODDA and SPDA water samples decreased as the soil salinities decreased over time. We used the farmland conditions from 2012 as the baseline for our experiment and evaluated how these baseline conditions changed over time in response to these treatments. Compared to this baseline, the cotton yield of ODDA and SPDA treated farmland increased by 18.30 times and 19.96 times in 2019, respectively. The investment payback periods for ODDA and SPDA treatments were 7.59 and 6.34 years, respectively, and their returns on investment were 12% and 30%, respectively. The midterm economic benefits of subsurface pipe drainage were more prominent than those of open ditch drainage. These results provide a reference for improving, developing, and utilizing soil saline–sodic land, and the sustainable development of agriculture in arid areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 52069026, U1803244,); Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (grant number 2020DB001, 2021BC003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZB: conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft, visualization. HL: conceptualization, validation, original draft preparation, data curation, project administration, funding acquisition. JL: Methodology, Validation, Supervision, Formal analysis, Writing—review and editing. ML: methodology, validation, supervision. PG: software, resources. PL: formal analysis. LL: investigation.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hongguang Liu or Jing Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Consent to participate

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Consent for publication

All the authors agreed to publish the final manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bai, Z., Liu, H., Li, J. et al. Eight-year comparison of agroeconomic benefits of open ditch and subsurface pipe drainage in mulched drip irrigated saline–sodic farmland. Irrig Sci 41, 687–699 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-022-00827-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-022-00827-6

Navigation