Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How Engineers and Roadside Vegetation Managers Maintain Roadside Vegetation in Iowa, USA

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently the value of roadside vegetation as habitat for pollinators has gained increased attention, particularly in areas dominated by agriculture where there is little native vegetation available. However, many factors, including safety, cost, public perception, erosion control, and weedy plants must be considered when managing roadside vegetation. Although their decisions influence thousands of hectares of public rights-of-way, how engineers and roadside managers maintain roadside vegetation has been the subject of little research. In this study, we surveyed county engineers and roadside managers who manage vegetation along secondary roads in Iowa, USA to assess how they maintain roadside vegetation. Some counties employ roadside managers, who often have an environmental sciences background, to implement the on-the-ground management of roadside vegetation, while some counties use other staff. Compared to engineers, roadside managers more strongly agreed that using the ecological principles of integrated roadside vegetation management (IRVM) provided environmental benefits. Engineers in counties with a roadside manager more strongly agreed that IRVM practices reduce the spread of invasive species and provide attractive roadsides. Both engineers and roadside managers mentioned challenges to managing roadside vegetation, including interference with some native plantings by adjacent landowners, and ranked safety and soil erosion concerns as the highest priorities when making decisions. Four in ten roadside managers said their counties had protected native plant community remnants on secondary roadsides. Our findings can inform conservation outreach efforts to those responsible for managing roadside vegetation, and emphasize the importance of addressing safety and soil erosion concerns in roadside research and communications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All of our data support our published claims and comply with field standards.

Material Availability

All of our materials support our published claims and comply with field standards.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Iowa Department of Transportation’s LRTF (Project 90-00-LR16-211) for funding this study. We also thank the county engineers and county roadside vegetation managers who contributed their time and opinions. We thank colleagues who reviewed earlier drafts of the paper.

Funding

Iowa Department of Transportation’s LRTF (Project 90-00-LR16-211).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristine Nemec.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent to Participate

Each participant was provided a letter stating that “The purpose of this study is to better understand how to successfully implement IRVM activities. We ask that you please complete the following questionnaire which includes items regarding IRVM and your county’s management of rights-of-way. The questionnaire should take 10–15 min to complete and you are free to skip any question you would prefer not to answer by selecting “prefer not to respond.” Participation is voluntary and your responses will be kept confidential. In reporting, no identifying information will be stored with your responses. There are no direct benefits for participating; however, your participation in the study is very important to us as your answers will be combined with others to better understand roadside vegetation management in Iowa. Risks are minimal and similar to those typically encountered in day-to-day life.”

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by the university institutional review board (IRB) and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nemec, K., Stephenson, A. & Losch, M. How Engineers and Roadside Vegetation Managers Maintain Roadside Vegetation in Iowa, USA. Environmental Management 70, 593–604 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01683-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01683-y

Keywords

Navigation