Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Long-Term Follow-up of Recurrence and Patient Satisfaction After Surgical Treatment of Gynecomastia

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

“Gynecomastia” is an enlargement of the male breast. Our study aims to assess patient satisfaction as well as evaluate differences in recurrence rates in lipomatous and glandular gynecomastia 10–19 years postoperatively.

Methods

Forty-one gynecomastia patients undergoing surgical treatment from 1997 to 2005 were invited for a follow-up examination 10–19 years postoperatively. Of these, 16 patients presented for a clinical examination. Patient satisfaction was measured with a validated questionnaire [consultation satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ)-9]. Furthermore, photo-material and patient charts were evaluated concerning preoperative macroscopical type of gynecomastia, BMI, and operative technique.

Results

Mean follow-up time was 13.8 years (range: 10.5–19 years). Eight patients (50%) had presented with lipomatous and eight patients (50%) with glandular gynecomastia prior to surgery. One of the patients with glandular gynecomastia (12.5%) presented with recurrence at the time of follow-up, while five of the eight patients showing lipomatous gynecomastia (62.5%) presented with recurrence. Interestingly, younger patient groups tend to be more satisfied with the operative treatment of gynecomastia than older patient groups, especially regarding the improvement of self-esteem.

Conclusions

Long-term follow-up results showed that recurrence rates are significantly higher in patients with lipomatous gynecomastia than in patients with glandular gynecomastia, with BMI increase in patients with glandular and lipomatous gynecomastia showing no statistically significant differences. Furthermore, general patient satisfaction and improvement of self-esteem was higher in younger patient groups than older patient groups.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Clinical Trial Registration Number: DRKS00009630.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lemaine V, Cayci C, Simmons PS, Petty P (2013) Gynecomastia in adolescent males. Semin Plast Surg 27(1):56–61

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Braunstein GD (1993) Gynecomastia. N Engl J Med 328(7):490–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma NS, Geffner ME (2008) Gynecomastia in prepubertal and pubertal men. Curr Opin Pediatr 20(4):465–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bembo SA, Carlson HE (2004) Gynecomastia: its features, and when and how to treat it. Clevel Clin J Med 71(6):511–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumanov P, Deepinder F, Robeva R, Tomova A, Li J, Agarwal A (2007) Relationship of adolescent gynecomastia with varicocele and somatometric parameters: a cross-sectional study in 6200 healthy boys. J Adolesc Health 41(2):126–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nuttall FQ (1979) Gynecomastia as a physical finding in normal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 48(2):338–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Niewoehner CB, Nuttal FQ (1984) Gynecomastia in a hospitalized male population. Am J Med 77(4):633–638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Webster JP (1946) Mastectomy for gynecomastia through a semicircular intra-areolar incision. Ann Surg 124:557–575

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Brody SA, Loriaux DL (2003) Epidemic of gynecomastia among haitian refugees: exposure to an environmental antiandrogen. Endocr Pract 9(5):370–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kinsella C Jr, Landfair A, Rottgers SA et al (2012) The psychological burden of idiopathic adolescent gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(1):1–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nuzzi LC, Cerrato FE, Erickson CR et al (2013) Psychosocial impact of adolescent gynecomastia: a prospective case-control study. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(4):890–896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Treves N (1958) Gynecomastia; the origins of mammary swelling in the male: an analysis of 406 patients with breast hypertrophy, 525 with testicular tumors, and 13 with adrenal neoplasms. Cancer 11(6):1083–1102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones DJ, Holt SD, Surtees P, Davison DJ, Coptcoat MJ (1990) A comparison of danazol and placebo in the treatment of adult idiopathic gynaecomastia: results of a prospective study in 55 patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72(5):296–298

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ting AC, Chow LW, Leung YF (2000) Comparison of tamoxifen with danazol in the management of idiopathic gynecomastia. Am Surg 66(1):38–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fradet Y, Egerdie B, Andersen M et al (2007) Tamoxifen as prophylaxis for prevention of gynaecomastia and breast pain associated with bicalutamide 150 mg monotherapy in patients with prostate cancer: a randomised, placebo-controlled, dose–response study. Eur Urol 52(1):106–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Perdona S, Autorino R, De Placido S et al (2005) Efficacy of tamoxifen and radiotherapy for prevention and treatment of gynaecomastia and breast pain caused by bicalutamide in prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 6(5):295–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Di Lorenzo G, Perdona S, De Placido S et al (2005) Gynecomastia and breast pain induced by adjuvant therapy with bicalutamide after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer: the role of tamoxifen and radiotherapy. J Urol 174(6):2197–2203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Voigt M, Walgenbach KJ, Andree C, Bannasch H, Looden Z, Stark GB (2001) Minimally invasive surgical therapy of gynecomastia: liposuction and exeresis technique. Chirurg 72(10):1190–1195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wong KY, Malata CM (2014) Conventional versus ultrasound-assisted liposuction in gynaecomastia surgery: a 13-year review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(7):921–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bracaglia R, Fortunato R, Gentileschi S, Seccia A, Farallo E (2004) Our experience with the so-called pull-through technique combined with liposuction for management of gynecomastia. Ann Plast Surg 53(1):22–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gingrass MK, Kenkel JM (1999) Comparing ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty with suction-assisted lipoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 26(2):283–288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Graf R, Auersvald A, Damasio RC et al (2003) Ultrasound-assisted liposuction: an analysis of 348 cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 27(2):146–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Walgenbach KJ, Riabikhin AW, Galla TJ et al (2001) Effect of ultrasonic assisted lipectomy (UAL) on breast tissue: histological findings. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25(2):85–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stark GB, Grandel S, Spilker G (1992) Tissue suction of the male and female breast. Aesthetic Plast Surg 16(4):317–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S (1973) Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 51(1):48–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fischer S, Hirsch T, Hirche C et al (2014) Surgical treatment of primary gynecomastia in children and adolescents. Pediatr Surg Int 30(6):641–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Koshy JC, Goldberg JS, Wolfswinkel EM, Ge Y, Heller L (2011) Breast cancer incidence in adolescent males undergoing subcutaneous mastectomy for gynecomastia: Is pathologic examination justified? A retrospective and literature review. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(1):1–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jaipaul CK, Rosenthal GE (2003) Are older patients more satisfied with hospital care than younger patients? J Gen Intern Med 18(1):23–30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ordaz DL, Thompson JK (2015) Gynecomastia and psychological functioning: a review of the literature. Body Image 15:141–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany

    A. Fricke, G. M. Lehner, G. B. Stark & V. Penna

Authors
  1. A. Fricke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. M. Lehner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. B. Stark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V. Penna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. Fricke or V. Penna.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fricke, A., Lehner, G.M., Stark, G.B. et al. Long-Term Follow-up of Recurrence and Patient Satisfaction After Surgical Treatment of Gynecomastia. Aesth Plast Surg 41, 491–498 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0827-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0827-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation