Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cervical disc herniation: which surgery?

  • Review
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cervical disc herniation is a common pathology. It can be treated by different surgical procedures. We aimed to list and analyzed every available surgical option. We focused on the comparison between anterior cervical decompression and fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty.

Results

The anterior approach is the most commonly used to achieve decompression and fusion by the mean of autograft or cage that could also be combined with anterior plating. Anterior procedures without fusion have shown good outcomes but are limited by post-operative cervicalgia and kyphotic events. Posterior cervical foraminotomy achieved good outcomes but is not appropriate in a case of a central hernia or ossification of the posterior ligament. Cervical disc arthroplasty is described to decrease the rate of adjacent segment degeneration. It became very popular during the last decades with numerous studies with different implant device showing encouraging results but it has not proved its superiority to anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Anterior bone loss and heterotopic ossification are still to be investigated.

Conclusion

Anterior cervical decompression and fusion remain the gold standard for surgical treatment of cervical disc herniation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamano Y (1985) Soft disc herniation of the cervical spine. Int Orthop 9:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00267033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT, Overholt DP (1990) Surgical management of cervical soft disc herniation. A comparison between the anterior and posterior approach. Spine 15:1026–1030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liao J-C, Niu C-C, Chen W-J, Chen L-H (2008) Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with cancellous allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Int Orthop 32:643–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0378-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Xie Y, Li H, Yuan J et al (2015) A prospective randomized comparison of PEEK cage containing calcium sulphate or demineralized bone matrix with autograft in anterior cervical interbody fusion. Int Orthop 39:1129–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2610-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. SMITH GW, ROBINSON RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40–A:607–624. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-195840030-00009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ipsen BJ, Kim DH, Jenis LG et al (2007) Effect of plate position on clinical outcome after anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 7:637–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2006.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chin KR, Pencle FJR, Mustafa LS et al (2018) Sentinel sign in standalone anterior cervical fusion: outcomes and fusion rate. J Orthop 15:935–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.027

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Spallone A, Marchione P, Li Voti P et al (2014) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with “mini-invasive” harvesting of iliac crest graft versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a retrospective outcome analysis. Int J Surg 12:1328–1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pointillart V, Cernier A, Vital JM, Senegas J (1995) Anterior discectomy without interbody fusion for cervical disc herniation. Eur Spine J 4:45–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G (2007) A new full-endoscopic technique for cervical posterior Foraminotomy in the treatment of lateral disc herniations using 6.9-mm endoscopes: prospective 2-year results of 87 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 50:219–226. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-985860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reitz H, Joubert MJ (1964) Intractable headache and cervico-brachialgia treated by complete replacement of cervical intervertebral discs with a metal prosthesis. South Afr Med J Suid-Afr Tydskr Vir Geneeskd 38:881–884

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng L, Nie L, Zhang L, Hou Y (2008) Fusion versus Bryan cervical disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study. Int Orthop 33:1347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0655-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Pfeiffer F et al (2005) Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement. J Neurosurg Spine 2:403–410. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2005.2.4.0403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kieser DC, Cawley DT, Fujishiro T et al (2018) Risk factors for anterior bone loss in cervical disc arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 29:123–129. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.1.SPINE171018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Luo J, Gong M, Huang S et al (2015) Incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical decompression and fusion meta-analysis of prospective studies. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:155–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2125-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scoville WB (1945) Recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of cervical ruptured intervertebral discs. Proc Am Fed Clin Res 2:23

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Song Z, Zhang Z, Hao J et al (2016) Microsurgery or open cervical foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy? A systematic review. Int Orthop 40:1335–1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3193-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Toole JE, Sheikh H, Eichholz KM et al (2006) Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy and discectomy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 17:411–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2006.06.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gala VC, O’Toole JE, Voyadzis J-M, Fessler RG (2007) Posterior minimally invasive approaches for the cervical spine. Orthop Clin N Am 38:339–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2007.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K (1996) Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. A noticeable complication. Spine 21:1969–1973

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zdeblick TA, Zou D, Warden KE et al (1992) Cervical stability after foraminotomy. A biomechanical in vitro analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:22–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Epstein NE, Schwall G, Reillly T et al (2011) Surgeon choices, and the choice of surgeons, affect total hospital charges for single-level anterior cervical surgery. Spine 36:905–909. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e6c4d8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Topuz K, Çolak A, Kaya S et al (2009) Two-level contiguous cervical disc disease treated with peek cages packed with demineralized bone matrix: results of 3-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 18:238–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0869-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Dickerman RD, Reynolds AS, Morgan B (2008) Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with bone morphogenic protein and demineralised bone matrix in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Int Orthop 32:717–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0450-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Young WF, Rosenwasser RH (1993) An early comparative analysis of the use of fibular allograft versus autologous iliac crest graft for interbody fusion after anterior cervical discectomy. Spine 18:1123–1124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Park J-B, Cho Y-S, Riew KD (2005) Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate. J Bone Jt Surg 87:558–563. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.C.01555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang JC, McDonough PW, Kanim LE et al (2001) Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 26:643–646-647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Das K, Couldwell WT, Sava G, Taddonio RF (2001) Use of cylindrical titanium mesh and locking plates in anterior cervical fusion. Technical note. J Neurosurg 94:174–178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fraser JF, Härtl R (2007) Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: a metaanalysis of fusion rates. J Neurosurg Spine 6:298–303. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2007.6.4.2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Suk K-S, Kim K-T, Lee S-H, Park S-W (2006) Prevertebral soft tissue swelling after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation. Int Orthop 30:290–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0072-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou J, Li J, Lin H et al (2018) A comparison of a self-locking stand-alone cage and anterior cervical plate for ACDF: minimum 3-year assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 170:73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.04.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kapetanakis S, Thomaidis T, Charitoudis G et al (2017) Single anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self- locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage: evaluation of pain and health-related quality of life. J Spine Surg 3:312–322. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2017.06.21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Grasso G, Giambartino F, Tomasello G, Iacopino G (2014) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with ROI-C peek cage: cervical alignment and patient outcomes. Eur Spine J 23:650–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3553-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Grasso G, Landi A (2018) Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion by zero-profile anchored cage. J Craniovertebral Junction Spine 9:87–92. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_36_18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen Y, Lü G, Wang B et al (2016) A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 25:2255–2262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4391-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG et al (2007) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine 32:2310–2317. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318154c57e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jho HD (1996) Microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy for radiculopathy: a new approach to cervical disc herniation. J Neurosurg 84:155–160. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.84.2.0155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ahn Y, Lee SH, Chung SE et al (2005) Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for discogenic cervical headache due to soft disc herniation. Neuroradiology 47:924–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-005-1436-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G (2008) Full-endoscopic anterior decompression versus conventional anterior decompression and fusion in cervical disc herniations. Int Orthop 33:1677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0684-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Fernström U (1966) Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprothesis in herniated disc and in painful disc. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 357:154–159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pointillart V, Castelain J-E, Coudert P et al (2018) Outcomes of the Bryan cervical disc replacement: fifteen year follow-up. Int Orthop 42:851–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3745-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen Y, He Z, Yang H et al (2013) Clinical and radiological results of total disc replacement in the cervical spine with preoperative reducible kyphosis. Int Orthop 37:463–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1754-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhu Y, Tian Z, Zhu B et al (2016) Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of cervical disc diseases: a meta-analysis of prospective, randomized controlled trials. [miscellaneous article]. Spine 41:E733–E741. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zheng B, Hao D, Guo H, He B (2017) ACDF vs TDR for patients with cervical spondylosis – an 8 year follow up study. BMC Surg 17:113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0316-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Lei T, Liu Y, Wang H et al (2016) Clinical and radiological analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up results compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Int Orthop 40:1197–1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3098-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zou S, Gao J, Xu B et al (2017) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Spine J 26:985–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4655-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA et al (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:519–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lee JC, Lee S-H, Peters C, Riew KD (2015) Adjacent segment pathology requiring reoperation after anterior cervical arthrodesis: the influence of smoking, sex, and number of operated levels. Spine 40:E571–E577. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhong Z-M, Zhu S-Y, Zhuang J-S et al (2016) Reoperation after cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop 474:1307–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4707-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Alvin MD, Abbott EE, Lubelski D et al (2014) Cervical arthroplasty: a critical review of the literature. Spine J 14:2231–2245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sundseth J, Fredriksli OA, Kolstad F et al (2017) The Norwegian cervical arthroplasty trial (NORCAT): 2-year clinical outcome after single-level cervical arthroplasty versus fusion—a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled multicenter study. Eur Spine J 26:1225–1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4922-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yi S, Shin DA, Kim KN et al (2013) The predisposing factors for the heterotopic ossification after cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine J 13:1048–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Guérin P, Obeid I, Bourghli A et al (2012) Heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement: clinical significance and radiographic analysis. A prospective study. Acta Orthop Belg 78:80–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de chirurgie orthopédique, Unité Rachis 1, CHU Bordeaux Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France

    Simon Mazas, Ahmed Benzakour, Jean-Etienne Castelain, Camille Damade, Soufiane Ghailane & Olivier Gille

Authors
  1. Simon Mazas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmed Benzakour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jean-Etienne Castelain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Camille Damade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Soufiane Ghailane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Olivier Gille
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Mazas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazas, S., Benzakour, A., Castelain, JE. et al. Cervical disc herniation: which surgery?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43, 761–766 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4221-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4221-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation