Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transitioning to the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Is it a true muscle sparing approach when performed by a low volume hip replacement surgeon?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We conducted this study to establish if the transition from a lateral approach (LA) to the direct anterior approach (DAA) for a low volume hip arthroplasty surgeon during the steep learning curve can be performed maintaining the muscle sparing approach of the DAA without increasing the complication rates.

Methods

In this controlled, prospective, randomized clinical study we investigated 70 patients (35 DAA, 35 LA) with similar demographics that underwent a total hip arthroplasty. Assessment of the two approaches consisted of determining the invasiveness through serum markers for muscle damage (i.e. myoglobin, creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase), the operative parameters such as post-operative pain and rescue medication consumption, the component positioning and complication rates.

Results

Post-operative myoglobin levels were higher (p < 0.001) in the LA group (326.42 ± 84.91 ng/mL) as compared to the DAA group (242.80 ± 71.03 ng/mL), but with no differences regarding other biomarkers for muscle damage. Pain levels were overall lower in the DAA group, with a statistical and clinical difference during surgery day (p < 0.001) associated with lower (p < 0.001) rescue medication consumption (median 1 (1; 3) mg morphine vs. 3 (2; 4) mg morphine). Most patients in the LA group reported chronic post-operative pain throughout all three evaluated months, while the majority of patients in the DAA group reported no pain after week six. Component positioning did not differ significantly between groups and neither did complication rates.

Conclusion

The DAA can be transitioned from the LA safely, without higher complication rates while maintaining its muscle spearing advantages when performed by a low volume hip arthroplasty surgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goebel S, Steinert AF, Schillinger J, Eulert J, Broscheit J, Rudert M, Nöth U (2011) Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach. Int Orthop 36(3):491–498. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1280-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Trousdale WH, Taunton MJ, Mabry TM, Abdel MP, Trousdale RT (2016) Patient perceptions of the direct anterior hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.006

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chechik O, Khashan M, Lador R, Salai M, Amar E (2013) Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(11):1595–1600. doi:10.1007/s00402-013-1828-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwartz BE, Sisko ZW, Mayekar EM, Wang OJ, Gordon AC (2016) Transitioning to the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: is it safe in the current health care climate? J Arthroplast 31(12):2819–2824. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dienstknecht T, Lüring C, Tingart M, Grifka J, Sendtner E (2013) A minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty does not diminish early post-operative outcome in obese patients: a prospective, randomised trial. Int Orthop 37(6):1013–1018. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1833-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Reichert JC, Volkmann MR, Koppmair M, Rackwitz L, Lüdemann M, Rudert M, Nöth U (2015) Comparative retrospective study of the direct anterior and transgluteal approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 39(12):2309–2313. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2732-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Anta-Díaz B, Serralta-Gomis J, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Benavidez E, López-Prats FA (2016) No differences between direct anterior and lateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty related to muscle damage or functional outcome. Int Orthop 40(10):2025–2030. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-3108-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Perkins FM, Kehlet H (2000) Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. Anesthesiology 93(4):1123–1133. doi:10.1097/00000542-200010000-00038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Müller M, Tohtz S, Dewey M, Springer I, Perka C (2010) Evidence of reduced muscle trauma through a minimally invasive anterolateral approach by means of MRI. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(12):3192–3200. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1378-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Homma Y, Baba T, Kobayashi H, Desroches A, Ozaki Y, Ochi H, Matsumoto M, Yuasa T, Kaneko K (2016) Safety in early experience with a direct anterior approach using fluoroscopic guidance with manual leg control for primary total hip arthroplasty: a consecutive one hundred and twenty case series. Int Orthop 40(12):2487–2494. doi:10.1007/s00264-016-3159-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mjaaland KE, Kivle K, Svenningsen S, Pripp AH, Nordsletten L (2015) Comparison of markers for muscle damage, inflammation, and pain using minimally invasive direct anterior versus direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Orthop Res 33(9):1305–1310. doi:10.1002/jor.22911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wallner O, Stark A, Muren O, Eisler T, Sköldenberg O (2015) Unstable hip arthroplasties. A prospective cohort study on seventy dislocating hips followed up for four years. Int Orthop 39:1037–1044. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2583-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taunton MJ, Mason JB, Odum SM, Springer BD (2014) Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty yields more rapid voluntary cessation of all walking aids: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplast 29(9):169–172. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Järvinen TA, Järvinen TL, Kääriäinen M, Kalimo H, Järvinen M (2005) Muscle injuries: biology and treatment. Am J Sports Med 33(5):745–764. doi:10.1177/0363546505274714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jelsma J, Pijnenburg R, Boons HW et al (2017) Limited benefits of the direct anterior approach in primary hip arthroplasty: a prospective single centre cohort study. J Orthop 14(1):53–58. doi:10.1016/j.jor.2016.10.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jelsma J, Pijnenburg R, Boons HW, Eggen PJ, Kleijn LL, Lacroix H, Noten HJ (2015) Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury with the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 40(8):1587–1593. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2942-0

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alecci V, Valente M, Crucil M, Minerva M, Pellegrino CM, Sabbadini DD (2011) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings. J OrthopTraumatol 12(3):123–129. doi:10.1007/s10195-011-0144-0

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spaans AJ, Van den Hout JA, Bolder SB (2012) High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach. Acta Orthop 83(4):342–346. doi:10.3109/17453674.2012.711701

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lovell TP (2008) Single-incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating table. J Arthroplast 23(7):64–68. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J BoneJointSurg (Br) 64:17–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sullivan GM, Feinn R (2012) Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ 4(3):279–282. doi:10.4300/jgme-d-12-00156.1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41:1149–1160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee JS, Hobden E, Stiell IG, Wells GA (2003) Clinically important change in the visual analog scale after adequate pain control. Acad Emerg Med 10(10):1128–1130. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00586.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yi C, Agudelo JF, Dayton MR, Morgan SJ (2013) Early complications of anterior supine intermuscular total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 36(3):e276–e281. doi:10.3928/01477447-20130222-14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. De Geest T, Fennema P, Lenaerts G, De Loore G (2015) Adverse effects associated with the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(8):1183–1192. doi:10.1007/s00402-015-2258-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kobayashi H, Homma Y, Baba T, Ochi H, Matsumoto M, Yuasa T, Kaneko K (2015) Surgeons changing the approach for total hip arthroplasty from posterior to direct anterior with fluoroscopy should consider potential excessive cup anteversion and flexion implantation of the stem in their early experience. Int Orthop 40(9):1813–1819. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-3059-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ilchmann T, Zimmerli W, Bolliger L, Graber P, Clauss M (2016) Risk of infection in primary, elective total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach or lateral transgluteal approach: a prospective cohort study of 1104 hips. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17(1):417. doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1332-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan-Viorel Nistor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Funding

There are no funding sources in support of this research.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained prior to starting this research. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nistor, DV., Caterev, S., Bolboacă, SD. et al. Transitioning to the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Is it a true muscle sparing approach when performed by a low volume hip replacement surgeon?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 2245–2252 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3480-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3480-8

Keywords

Navigation