Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New “L value” parameter simplifies and enhances hip ultrasound interpretation in the detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to simplify and enhance the ultrasound (US) analysis of the infant’s hip by introducing a novel parameter named “L value” into the widely used Graf method.

Methods

We analysed 508 ultrasonographic images of the hips in infants aged three months. The images were first evaluated using the Graf measurements. On the same images, two additional measurements were performed in order to define the new parameter that was named L value. The threshold values of the new L value were identified based on the highest specificity as well as sensitivity for discrimination between the Graf groups. Those values were then used in order to reclassify the hips into three simplified groups. Inter-observer agreement was estimated by Cohen’s kappa coefficient.

Results

The threshold values for the L value between Graf groups Ia and Ib was 0.46, between Ib and IIb was 0.68 and between IIb and IIc was 0.92. Correlation analysis between Graf’s classification and the values of the L value was performed and was proved to be statistically significant, r = 0.49; p < 0.001. After simplifying the classification into three newly defined groups of patients depending on the degree of hip development, the correlation coefficient was much higher, r = 0.94, r 2 = 0.88 for p < 0.001. Inter-observer agreement for the L value was substantial.

Conclusions

The new L value parameter in Graf’s ultrasound hip evaluation enables a faster, simpler, more reliable and more unbiased classification for developmental dysplasia of the hip as the L value changes proportionally with the hip maturity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mahan ST, Katz JN, Kim YJ (2009) To screen or not to screen? A decision analysis of the utility of screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1705–1719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kocher MS (2000) Ultrasonographic screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: an epidemiologic analysis (part I). Am J Orthop 29:929–933

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosendahl K, Markestad T, Lie RT (1992) Ultrasound in the early diagnosis of congenital dislocation of the hip: the significance of hip stability versus acetabular morphology. Pediatr Radiol 22:430–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel H, Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (2001) Canadian task force on preventive health care. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. CMAJ 164:1669–1677

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shipman SA, Helfand M, Moyer VA, Yawn BP (2006) Screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic literature review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics 117:e557–e576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. American Academy of Pediatrics (2000) Clinical practice guideline: early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Committee on Quality Improvement, Subcommittee on Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. Pediatrics 105:896–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bialik V, Bialik GM, Blazer S, Sujov P, Wiener F, Berant M (1999) Developmental dysplasia of the hip: a new approach to incidence. Pediatrics 103:93–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Graf R (1984) Fundamentals of sonographic diagnosis of infant hip dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop 4:735–740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Graf R (2006) Hip sonography, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, p 41

    Google Scholar 

  10. Simon EA, Saur F, Buerge M, Glaab R, Roos M, Kohler G (2004) Inter-observer agreement of ultrasonographic measurement of alpha and beta angles and the final type classification based on the Graf method. Swiss Med Wkly 134:671–677

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dias JJ, Thomas IH, Lamont AC, Mody BS, Thompson JR (1993) The reliability of ultrasonographic assessment of neonatal hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:479–482

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tudor A, Sestan B, Rakovac I et al (2007) The rational strategies for detecting developmental dysplasia of the hip at the age of 4–6 months old infants: a prospective study. Coll Antropol 31:475–481

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morin C, Harcke HT, MacEwen GD (1985) The infant hip: real-time US assessment of acetabular development. Radiology 157:673–677

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gunay C, Atalar H, Dogruel H, Yavuz OY, Uras I, Sayli U (2009) Correlation of femoral head coverage and Graf α angle in infants being screened for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Int Orthop 33:761–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harcke HT, Clarke NM, Lee MS, Borns PF, MacEwen GD (1984) Examination of the infant hip with real-time ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 3:131–137

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Terjesen T, Rundén TO, Tangerud A (1989) Ultrasonography and radiography of the hip in infants. Acta Orthop Scand 60:651–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Terjesen T, Bredland T, Berg V (1989) Ultrasound for hip assessment in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:767–773

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Suzuki S, Kasahara Y, Futami T, Ushikubo S, Tsuchiya T (1991) Ultrasonography in congenital dislocation of the hip. Simultaneous imaging of both hips from in front. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:879–883

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hospital for Orthopaedic Surgery Lovran, School of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia

    Ivan Rakovac, Anton Tudor, Branko Sestan, Tomislav Prpic, Gordan Gulan, Tomislav Madarevic & Veljko Santic

  2. Department of Sport & Exercise Medicine, School of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

    Lana Ruzic

Authors
  1. Ivan Rakovac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anton Tudor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Branko Sestan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tomislav Prpic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gordan Gulan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tomislav Madarevic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Veljko Santic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lana Ruzic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Rakovac.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rakovac, I., Tudor, A., Sestan, B. et al. New “L value” parameter simplifies and enhances hip ultrasound interpretation in the detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 35, 1523–1528 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1256-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1256-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation