Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of different driver power amplitudes on liver stiffness measurement in pediatric liver MR elastography

  • Hepatobiliary
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess how different driver power amplitudes affect the measurement of liver stiffness in pediatric liver magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).

Methods

From January 2018 to May 2018, pediatric patients (≤ 18 years) who underwent liver MRE with 20% and 56% driver power amplitudes were included in this retrospective study. Region-of-interests (ROIs) were drawn on four stiffness maps to include the largest area of the liver parenchyma. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess agreements for the area, mean, maximum, minimum and standard deviation of liver stiffness between the driver power amplitudes.

Results

128 MRE stiffness maps from 16 patients (M:F = 10:6, median 12.5 years old) were included. On MRE, median ROI areas of liver were 83.1 cm2 (range, 46.9–144.1 cm2) and 63.0 cm2 (range, 5.4–123.4 cm2) for the driver power amplitudes of 20% and 56%, respectively. Median liver stiffness values were 2.3 kPa (range, 1.7–8.0 kPa) and 2.8 kPa (range, 1.7–8.5 kPa). Maximum and minimum liver stiffness values were 5.3 kPa and 1.0 kPa for 20% and 7.8 kPa and 1.1 kPa for 56%. Standard deviation was 0.6 kPa for 20% and 1.0 kPa for 56%. ICC values between the two power amplitudes were 0.33–0.51 for the ROI area and the maximum, minimum and standard deviation values of liver stiffness. The ICC value for liver stiffness was 0.857 (95% confidence interval, 0.760–0.915).

Conclusion

Liver stiffness with two driver power amplitudes on MRE showed good reliability in pediatric patients. Driver power amplitudes need to be optimized according to the pediatric liver size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Available on demands.

References

  1. Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D (2008) Autoimmune pediatric liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 14(21):3360–3367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mavis AM, Alonso EM (2015) Liver disease in the adolescent. Clin Liver Dis 19(1):171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman SL (2010) Evolving challenges in hepatic fibrosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(8):425–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bortolotti F, Guido M (2007) Reversal of liver cirrhosis: a desirable clinical outcome and its pathogenic background. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 44(4):401–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Castera L, Pinzani M (2010) Biopsy and non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis: does it take two to tango? Gut 59:861–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Etchell E, Jugé L, Hatt A, Sinkus R, Bilston LE (2017) Liver Stiffness Values Are Lower in Pediatric Subjects than in Adults and Increase with Age: A Multifrequency MR Elastography Study. Radiology 283(1):222–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Joshi M, Dillman JR, Towbin AJ, Serai SD, Trout AT (2017) MR elastography: high rate of technical success in pediatric and young adult patients. Pediatr Radiol 47(7):838–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Trout AT, Sheridan RM, Serai SD, Xanthakos SA, Su W, Zhang B, Wallihan DB (2018) Diagnostic Performance of MR Elastography for Liver Fibrosis in Children and Young Adults with a Spectrum of Liver Diseases. Radiology 287(3):824–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shinagawa Y, Mitsufuji T, Morimoto S, Nakamuta R, Urakawa H, Morita A, Fujimitsu R, Takano K, Yoshimitsu K (2014) Optimization of scanning parameters for MR elastography at 3.0 T clinical unit: volunteer study. Jpn J Radiol 32(7):441–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Serai SD, Towbin AJ, Podberesky DJ (2012) Pediatric liver MR elastography. Dig Dis Sci 57(10):2713–2719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Binkovitz LA, El-Youssef M, Glaser KJ, Yin M, Binkovitz AK, Ehman RL (2012) Pediatric MR elastography of hepatic fibrosis: principles, technique and early clinical experience. Pediatr Radiol 42(4):402–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim JK, Yoon H, Lee M-J, Kim M-J, Han K, Koh H, Kim S, Han SJ, Shin HJ (2019) Feasibility of Spin-Echo Echo-Planar Imaging MR Elastography in Livers of Children and Young Adults. Investig Magn Reson Imaging 23(3):251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Calle-Toro JS, Serai SD, Hartung EA, Goldberg DJ, Bolster BD, Jr., Darge K, Anupindi SA (2019) Magnetic resonance elastography SE-EPI vs GRE sequences at 3T in a pediatric population with liver disease. Abdom Radiol (NY) 44(3):894–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. JM B, D A (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327(8476):307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Siegel MJ, Priatna A, Bolster Jr BD, Kotyk JJ (2012) Pediatric MR elastography of the liver. Clin Pediatr Imaging:108–111

  16. Guglielmo FF, Venkatesh SK, Mitchell DG (2019) Liver MR elastography technique and image interpretation: pearls and pitfalls. Radiographics 39(7):1983–2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

We have no financial relationships to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyun Joo Shin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The Institutional Review Board approved this single-center retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, DK., Yoon, H., Han, K. et al. Effect of different driver power amplitudes on liver stiffness measurement in pediatric liver MR elastography. Abdom Radiol 46, 4729–4735 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03197-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03197-3

Keywords

Navigation