Skip to main content
Log in

Hepatic disorders associated with exogenous sex steroids: MR imaging findings

  • Review
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To describe the MRI findings of the effects of exogenous sex steroids on the liver.

Findings

Estrogens, progesterone and synthetic testosterone are exogenous sex steroids that may result in a variety of liver diseases, including tumour formation and vascular disorders. These hormones are mainly administered in the form of the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) and anabolic steroids. Both are implicated in hepatic adenoma formation. The HNF-1α-mutated and inflammatory adenoma subgroups are more commonly seen in association with the OCP whereas there is an increased incidence of the β-catenin positive subtype with anabolic steroid use. Furthermore, anabolic steroids are associated with hepatocellular carcinoma resulting from malignant transformation of β-catenin positive adenomas. The oral contraceptive pill may also induce vascular disorders within the liver, some of which are related to the prothrombotic effect of the hormones, such as hepatic and portal vein thrombosis. Other hepatic vascular abnormalities resulting from exogenous sex steroids include veno-occlusive disease and peliosis hepatis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katabathina VS, Menias CO, Shanbhogue AK, Jagirdar J, Paspulati RM, Prasad SR. Genetics and imaging of hepatocellular adenomas: 2011 update. Radiographics. 2011;31(6):1529–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dhingra S, Fiel MI. Update on the new classification of hepatic adenomas: clinical, molecular, and pathologic characteristics. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138(8):1090–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McInnes MD, Hibbert RM, Inacio JR, Schieda N. Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatocellular Adenoma: Accuracy of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging: A Systematic Review. Radiology. 2015;277(2):413–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bioulac-Sage P, Laumonier H, Couchy G, Le Bail B, Sa Cunha A, Rullier A, et al. Hepatocellular adenoma management and phenotypic classification: the Bordeaux experience. Hepatology. 2009;50(2):481–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoneda N, Matsui O, Kitao A, Kozaka K, Kobayashi S, Sasaki M, et al. Benign Hepatocellular Nodules: Hepatobiliary Phase of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging Based on Molecular Background. Radiographics. 2016;36(7):2010–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rebouissou S, Imbeaud S, Balabaud C, Boulanger V, Bertrand-Michel J, Terce F, et al. HNF1alpha inactivation promotes lipogenesis in human hepatocellular adenoma independently of SREBP-1 and carbohydrate-response element-binding protein (ChREBP) activation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(19):14437–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Aalten SM, Thomeer MG, Terkivatan T, Dwarkasing RS, Verheij J, de Man RA, et al. Hepatocellular adenomas: correlation of MR imaging findings with pathologic subtype classification. Radiology. 2011;261(1):172–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grazioli L, Bondioni MP, Haradome H, Motosugi U, Tinti R, Frittoli B, et al. Hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging in differential diagnosis. Radiology. 2012;262(2):520–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ronot M, Bahrami S, Calderaro J, Valla DC, Bedossa P, Belghiti J, et al. Hepatocellular adenomas: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and liver biopsy in subtype classification. Hepatology. 2011;53(4):1182–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bieze M, van den Esschert JW, Nio CY, Verheij J, Reitsma JB, Terpstra V, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in differentiating hepatocellular adenoma from focal nodular hyperplasia: prospective study of the additional value of gadoxetate disodium. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(1):26–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Socas L, Zumbado M, Perez-Luzardo O, Ramos A, Perez C, Hernandez JR, et al. Hepatocellular adenomas associated with anabolic androgenic steroid abuse in bodybuilders: a report of two cases and a review of the literature. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(5):e27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hardt A, Stippel D, Odenthal M, Holscher AH, Dienes HP, Drebber U. Development of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with anabolic androgenic steroid abuse in a young bodybuilder: a case report. Case Rep Pathol. 2012;2012:195607.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kitao A, Matsui O, Yoneda N, Kozaka K, Kobayashi S, Sanada J, et al. Hepatocellular Carcinoma with beta-Catenin Mutation: Imaging and Pathologic Characteristics. Radiology. 2015;275(3):708–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Solbach P, Potthoff A, Raatschen HJ, Soudah B, Lehmann U, Schneider A, et al. Testosterone-receptor positive hepatocellular carcinoma in a 29-year old bodybuilder with a history of anabolic androgenic steroid abuse: a case report. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kitao A, Matsui O, Yoneda N, Kozaka K, Kobayashi S, Koda W, et al. Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between biologic features and signal intensity on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images. Radiology. 2012;265(3):780–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sutherland T, Seale M, Yap K. Part 1: MRI features of focal nodular hyperplasia with an emphasis on hepatobiliary contrast agents. Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology. 2014;58(1):50–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohajer K, Frydrychowicz A, Robbins JB, Loeffler AG, Reed TD, Reeder SB. Characterization of hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia with gadoxetic acid. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36(3):686–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarma A, Shaaban AM, Heilbrun ME, Rezvani M. Two cases of near-complete regression of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: case reports and review of the literature. Radiology case reports. 2012;7(3).

  19. Mathieu D, Kobeiter H, Cherqui D, Rahmouni A, Dhumeaux D. Oral contraceptive intake in women with focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. The Lancet. 1998;352(9141):1679–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Colli A, Fraquelli M, Massironi S, Colucci A, Paggi S, Conte D. Elective surgery for benign liver tumours. The Cochrane Library. 2007.

  21. Mathieu D, Kobeiter H, Maison P, Rahmouni A, Cherqui D, Zafrani ES, et al. Oral contraceptive use and focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Gastroenterology. 2000;118(3):560–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Anderson SW, Kruskal JB, Kane RA. Benign hepatic tumors and iatrogenic pseudotumors. Radiographics. 2009;29(1):211–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Savastano S, San Bortolo O, Velo E, Rettore C, Altavilla G. Pseudotumoral appearance of peliosis hepatis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(2):558–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Torabi M, Hosseinzadeh K, Federle MP. CT of nonneoplastic hepatic vascular and perfusion disorders. Radiographics. 2008;28(7):1967–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Iannaccone R, Federle MP, Brancatelli G, Matsui O, Fishman EK, Narra VR, et al. Peliosis hepatis: spectrum of imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(1):W43–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Verswijvel G, Janssens F, Colla P, Mampaey S, Verhelst H, Van Eycken P, et al. Peliosis hepatis presenting as a multifocal hepatic pseudotumor: MR findings in two cases. Eur Radiol. 2003;13 Suppl 4:L40–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hong GS, Kim KW, An J, Shim JH, Kim J, Yu ES. Focal type of peliosis hepatis. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2015;21(4):398–401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim SH, Lee JM, Kim WH, Han JK, Lee JY, Choi BI. Focal peliosis hepatis as a mimicker of hepatic tumors: radiological-pathological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31(1):79–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ferrozzi F, Tognini G, Zuccoli G, Cademartiri F, Pavone P. Peliosis hepatis with pseudotumoral and hemorrhagic evolution: CT and MR findings. Abdom Imaging. 2001;26(2):197–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ferral H, Behrens G, Lopera J. Budd-Chiari syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(4):737–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cura M, Haskal Z, Lopera J. Diagnostic and interventional radiology for Budd-Chiari syndrome. Radiographics. 2009;29(3):669–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brancatelli G, Vilgrain V, Federle MP, Hakime A, Lagalla R, Iannaccone R, et al. Budd-Chiari syndrome: spectrum of imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(2):W168–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Aronson JK. Meyler's side effects of drugs: the international encyclopedia of adverse drug reactions and interactions: Elsevier; 2015.

  34. Erden A. Budd-Chiari syndrome: a review of imaging findings. Eur J Radiol. 2007;61(1):44–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee HK, Park SJ, Yi BH, Yeon EK, Kim JH, Hong HS. Portal vein thrombosis: CT features. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33(1):72–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mantaka A, Augoustaki A, Kouroumalis EA, Samonakis DN. Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: diagnosis, natural history, and therapeutic challenges. Ann Gastroenterol. 2018;31(3):315–29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Margini C, Berzigotti A. Portal vein thrombosis: The role of imaging in the clinical setting. Dig Liver Dis. 2017;49(2):113–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jha RC, Khera SS, Kalaria AD. Portal Vein Thrombosis: Imaging the Spectrum of Disease With an Emphasis on MRI Features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211(1):14–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou H, Wang YX, Lou HY, Xu XJ, Zhang MM. Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome caused by herbal medicine: CT and MRI features. Korean J Radiol. 2014;15(2):218–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Erturk SM, Mortele KJ, Binkert CA, Glickman JN, Oliva MR, Ros PR, et al. CT features of hepatic venoocclusive disease and hepatic graft-versus-host disease in patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(6):1497–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mortele KJ, Van Vlierberghe H, Wiesner W, Ros PR. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease: MRI findings. Abdom Imaging. 2002;27(5):523–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang S, Wu J, Lei S. CT Features of Hepatic Veno-occlusive Disease: A Meta-analysis. Acad Radiol. 2018;25(3):328–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dumont C, Lambert M, Van Beers BE. MR imaging findings in a patient with hepatic veno-occlusive disease. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2004;67(2):236–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Hock Kua, pathologist, for reviewing the pathological findings in our cases.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cathryn L. Hui.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CME activity

This article has been selected as the CME activity for the current month. Please visit https://ce.mayo.edu/node/83722 and follow the instructions to complete this CME activity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hui, C.L., Lee, Z.J. Hepatic disorders associated with exogenous sex steroids: MR imaging findings. Abdom Radiol 44, 2436–2447 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01941-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01941-4

Keywords

Navigation