Abstract
Purpose
32P-chromic phosphate colloid treatments of astrocytoma and craniopharyngioma cystic brain tumours in paediatric patients are conventionally based on a sphere model under the assumption of uniform uptake. The aims of this study were to determine the distribution of the absorbed dose delivered by 32P on a patient-specific basis and to evaluate the accuracy with which this can be predicted from a pretherapy administration of 99mTc-Sn colloid.
Methods
Three patients were treated with 32P-chromic phosphate colloid following 99mTc-Sn colloid administrations. Convolution dosimetry was performed using pretherapy and posttherapy sequential SPECT imaging, and verified with EGSnrc Monte Carlo radiation transport simulations. Mean absorbed doses to the cyst wall and dose–volume histograms were also calculated and compared with those obtained by the sphere model approach.
Results
Highly nonuniform uptake distributions of both the 99mTc and 32P colloids were observed and characterized by dose–volume histograms to the cyst wall. Mean absorbed doses delivered to the cyst wall, obtained with the convolution method, were on average 21 % (SD 18 %) and 50 % (SD 30 %) lower than those predicted by the 99mTc distribution and the uniform assumption of the sphere model, respectively.
Conclusion
Absorbed doses delivered to the cyst wall by 32P are more accurately predicted from image-based patient-specific convolution dosimetry than from simple sphere models. These results indicate the necessity to perform personalized treatment planning and verification for intracavitary irradiation of cystic brain tumours treated with radiocolloids. Patient-specific dosimetry can be used to guide the frequency and levels of repeated administrations and would facilitate data collection and comparison to support the multicentre trials necessary to progress this therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Karavitaki N, Cudlip S, Adams CB, Wass JA. Craniopharyngiomas. Endocr Rev. 2006;27(4):371–97. doi:10.1210/er.2006-0002.
Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114(2):97–109. doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4.
Tihan T, Fisher PG, Kepner JL, Godfraind C, McComb RD, Goldthwaite PT, et al. Pediatric astrocytomas with monomorphous pilomyxoid features and a less favorable outcome. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1999;58(10):1061–8.
Habrand JL, Ganry O, Couanet D, Rouxel V, Levy-Piedbois C, Pierre-Kahn A, et al. The role of radiation therapy in the management of craniopharyngioma: a 25-year experience and review of the literature. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44(2):255–63.
Leksell L. The stereotaxic method and radiosurgery of the brain. Acta Chir Scand. 1951;102(4):316–9.
Leksell L, Liden K. A therapeutic trial with radioactive isotopes in cystic brain tumours. radioisotope techniques Vol 1, Med Physiol Appl, HM Stationery Office, Oxford. 1952;1–4.
Barriger RB, Chang A, Lo SS, Timmerman RD, DesRosiers C, Boaz JC, et al. Phosphorus-32 therapy for cystic craniopharyngiomas. Radiother Oncol. 2011;98(2):207–12. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.12.001.
Shahzadi S, Sharifi G, Andalibi R, Zali A, Ali-Asgari A. Management of cystic craniopharyngiomas with intracavitary irradiation with 32P. Arch Iran Med. 2008;11(1):30–4.
Zhao R, Deng J, Liang X, Zeng J, Chen X, Wang J. Treatment of cystic craniopharyngioma with phosphorus-32 intracavitary irradiation. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010;26(5):669–74. doi:10.1007/s00381-009-1025-1.
Derrey S, Blond S, Reyns N, Touzet G, Carpentier P, Gauthier H, et al. Management of cystic craniopharyngiomas with stereotactic endocavitary irradiation using colloidal 186Re: a retrospective study of 48 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(6):1045–52. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000335786.10968.2F. discussion 52–3.
Hasegawa T, Kondziolka D, Hadjipanayis CG, Lunsford LD. Management of cystic craniopharyngiomas with phosphorus-32 intracavitary irradiation. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(4):813–20. discussion 20–2.
Voges J, Sturm V, Lehrke R, Treuer H, Gauss C, Berthold F. Cystic craniopharyngioma: long-term results after intracavitary irradiation with stereotactically applied colloidal beta-emitting radioactive sources. Neurosurgery. 1997;40(2):263–9. discussion 9–70.
Pollock BE, Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Levine G, Flickinger JC. Phosphorus-32 intracavitary irradiation of cystic craniopharyngiomas: current technique and long-term results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33(2):437–46.
Fig LM, Shapiro B, Taren J. Distribution of [32P]-chromic phosphate colloid in cystic brain tumors. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1992;59(1-4):166–8.
Kumar PP, Good RR, Skultety FM, Jones EO, Chu WK. Retreatment of recurrent cystic craniopharyngioma with chromic phosphorus P 32. J Natl Med Assoc. 1986;78(6):542–3, 547–9.
Taasan V, Shapiro B, Taren JA, Beierwaltes WH, McKeever P, Wahl RL, et al. Phosphorus-32 therapy of cystic grade IV astrocytomas: technique and preliminary application. J Nucl Med. 1985;26(11):1335–8.
Lunsford LD, Gumerman L, Levine G. Stereotactic intracavitary irradiation of cystic neoplasms of the brain. Appl Neurophysiol. 1985;48(1-6):146–50.
Kobayashi T, Kageyama N, Ohara K. Internal irradiation for cystic craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg. 1981;55(6):896–903. doi:10.3171/jns.1981.55.6.0896.
Shapiro B, Fig LM, Gross MD. Intracavitary therapy of craniopharyngiomas. Q J Nucl Med. 1999;43(4):367–74.
Janicki C, Seuntjens J. Re-evaluation of the dose to the cyst wall in P-32 radiocolloid treatments of cystic brain tumors using the dose-point-kernel and Monte Carlo methods. Med Phys. 2003;30(9):2475–81.
Loevinger R. The dosimetry of beta sources in tissue; the point-source function. Radiology. 1956;66(1):55–62.
Gutin PH, Klemme WM, Lagger RL, MacKay AR, Pitts LH, Hosobuchi Y. Management of the unresectable cystic craniopharyngioma by aspiration through an Ommaya reservoir drainage system. J Neurosurg. 1980;52(1):36–40. doi:10.3171/jns.1980.52.1.0036.
Heard S, Flux GD, Guy MJ, Ott RJ. Monte Carlo simulation of 90Y Bremsstrahlung imaging. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2004 IEEE. vol 6. 2004. p. 3579–3583. doi:10.1109/NSSMIC.2004.1466658
Kawrakow I. Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version. Med Phys. 2000;27(3):485–98.
Stabin MG, da Luz LC. Decay data for internal and external dose assessment. Health Phys. 2002;83(4):471–5.
Eckerman KF, Endo A. MIRD: radionuclide data and decay Schemes. Reston: Society of Nuclear Medicine; 2007.
Lanconelli N, Pacilio M, Lo Meo S, Botta F, Di Dia A, Aroche AT, et al. A free database of radionuclide voxel S values for the dosimetry of nonuniform activity distributions. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(2):517–33. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/57/2/517.
Bolch WE, Bouchet LG, Robertson JS, Wessels BW, Siegel JA, Howell RW, et al. MIRD pamphlet No. 17: the dosimetry of nonuniform activity distributions – radionuclide S values at the voxel level. Medical Internal Radiation Dose Committee. J Nucl Med. 1999;40(1):11S–36S.
Rojas EL, Al-Dweri FM, Lallena AM, Bodineau C, Galan P. Dosimetry for radiocolloid therapy of cystic craniopharyngiomas. Med Phys. 2003;30(9):2482–92.
Hafeli UO, Pauer GJ, Unnithan J, Prayson RA. Fibrin glue system for adjuvant brachytherapy of brain tumors with 188Re and 186Re-labeled microspheres. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2007;65(3):282–8. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2006.10.016.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the CRUK/EPSRC Cancer Imaging Centre in association with MRC and the Department of Health C1060/A10334, NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and the Clinical Research Facility in Imaging, and the Multimodality Techniques for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy EPSRC platform grant EP/H046526/1.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Denis-Bacelar, A.M., Romanchikova, M., Chittenden, S. et al. Patient-specific dosimetry for intracavitary 32P-chromic phosphate colloid therapy of cystic brain tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40, 1532–1541 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2451-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2451-6