Skip to main content
Log in

Current state of musculoskeletal fellowship program directors and future directions

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To better understand the current state of musculoskeletal fellowship program directors and identify opportunities for formal training that could increase job satisfaction, provide a broader knowledge base for mentoring/advising trainees and increase diversity in musculoskeletal radiology.

Materials and methods

Eighty-one fellowship program directors who signed the Fellowship Match Memorandum of Understanding with the Society of Skeletal Radiology were sent a survey with questions about demographics, career, background, and training both for musculoskeletal radiology and for the fellowship director role.

Results

A 57/81 (70%) of program directors responded, representing 27 different states with a range of 1–9 fellowship positions. Nearly half are in their forties (48%) with most identifying as White (67%) followed by Asian (30%). The majority are male (72%) with over half (60%) remaining at the institution where they completed prior training. Over half plan to change roles within 5 years and do not feel adequately compensated. Top qualities/skills identified as important for the role include effective communication, being approachable, and clinical excellence. Other than clinical excellence, most do not report formal training in skills identified as important for the role.

Conclusions

Given the high amount of interaction with trainees, program directors play a key role in the future of our subspecialty. The low diversity among this group, the lack of formal training, and the fact that most do not feel adequately compensated could limit mentorship and recruitment. Program directors identified effective communication, organizational/planning skills, and conflict resolution as the top skills they would benefit from formal training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Percentage change in the number of active physicians by specialty, 2016-2021. AAMC. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/data/percentage-change-number-active-physicians-specialty-2016-2021. Accessed Sept-Nov 2023.

  2. NRMP Match Results Statistics, Radiology – 2019–2023, Overall statistics. National Resident Matching Program, Washington, DC. 2019–2023.

  3. Bruls RJM, Kwee RM. Workload for radiologists during on-call hours: dramatic increase in the past 15 years. Insights Imaging. 2020;11(1):121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Census Regions and Divisions of the United States PACIFIC AK 0 200 400 Miles M OU NT AI N P A C IF IC. 1984. Available from: https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdf. Accessed Sept-Nov 2023.

  5. Qamar SR, Khurshid K, Jalal S, Bancroft L, Munk PL, Nicolaou S, Khosa F. Academic musculoskeletal radiology: influences for gender disparity. Skeletal Radiol. 2018;47(3):381–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Physician Specialty Data Report. AAMC. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/report/physician-specialty-data-report. Accessed Sept-Nov 2023.

  7. Active Physicians by Sex and Specialty, 2021. AAMC. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/data/active-physicians-sex-specialty-2021. Accessed Sept-Nov 2023.

  8. Wu X, Bajaj S, Khunte M, Revzin M, Gandhi D, Wintermark M, et al. Diversity in radiology: current status and trends over the past decade. Radiology. 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 4];305(3):640–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35943334/. Accessed Sept-Nov 2023.

  9. Stanford FC. The importance of diversity and inclusion in the healthcare workforce. J Natl Med Assoc. 2020;112(3):247–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32336480/. Accessed Sept-Nov 2023.

  10. Total Graduates by U.S. MD-Granting Medical School and Gender, 2018-2019 through 2022-2023. AAMC. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/data/2023-facts-enrollment-graduates-and-md-phd-data. Accessed Sept-Nov 2023.

  11. Active physicians who identified as White, 2021. AAMC. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/data/active-physicians-white-2021. Accessed Sept-Nov 2023.

  12. Active physicians who identified as Asian, 2021. AAMC. [cited 2023 Sep 26]. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/data/active-physicians-asian-2021. Accessed Sept-Nov 2023.

  13. Active physicians who identified as Hispanic (Alone or With Any Race), 2021. AAMC. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/data/active-physicians-hispanic-alone-or-any-race-2021. Accessed Sept-Nov 2023.

  14. Active physicians who identified as Black or African-American, 2021. AAMC. [cited 2023 Sep 26]. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/data/active-physicians-black-african-american-2021. Accessed Sept-Nov 2023.

  15. Hall TR, Brown K. Diversity in radiology: the right thing to do, the smart thing to do. Pediatr Radiol. 2022.

  16. Key Findings. Available from: https://coqual.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/CoqualTheSponsorDividend_KeyFindingsCombined090720.pdf. Accessed Sept-Nov 2023.

  17. Karunanayake D, Nauta MM. The relationship between race and students’ identified career role models and perceived role model influence. The Career Development Quarterly. 2004 March; volume 52.

  18. Grimm LJ, Lowell DA, Cater SW, Yoon SC. Differential motivations for pursuing diagnostic radiology by gender. Acad Radiol. 2017;24(10):1312–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nonnemaker L. Women physicians in academic medicine — new insights from cohort studies. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(6):399–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bailey CR, Bailey AM, McKenney AS, Weiss CR. Understanding and appreciating burnout in radiologists. Radiographics. 2022;42(5):E137–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahrari A, Abbas A, Bhayana R, Harris A, Probyn L. Leadership development programs for radiology residents: a literature review. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021;5:084653712098649.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Blumenthal DM, Bernard K, Bohnen J, Bohmer R. Addressing the leadership gap in medicine. Acad Med. 2012;87(4):513–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kamalapathy PN, Raso J, Rahman R, Harihar S, Lozano-Calderon S, Hassanzadeh H. Orthopedic surgery fellowship directors: trends in demographics, education, employment, and institutional familiarity. HSS J: Musculoskelet J Hosp Spec Surg. 2023 [cited 2023 Sep 21];19(1):113–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36776521/. Accessed Sept-Nov 2023.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maxine E. Kresse.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kresse, M.E., Morris, R.W., Weaver, J.S. et al. Current state of musculoskeletal fellowship program directors and future directions. Skeletal Radiol 53, 1165–1172 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04553-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04553-8

Keywords

Navigation