Abstract
Objective
To present the 2019 Musculoskeletal (MSK) fellowship Match information most useful to MSK fellowship programs and sections in hopes of optimizing the fellowship application and selection process for MSK fellowship applicants and training programs.
Materials/methods
We performed a mixed method analysis to gain a better understanding of the 2019 MSK Fellowship Match process. First, we distributed a ten-question survey to the fellowship leadership from the 78 US fellowship programs registered with the Society of Skeletal Radiology. Second, we collected and reviewed NRMP Match data that were distributed on Match Day.
Results
We received completed surveys from 37 (45.7%) programs. Thirty-three (89.2%) of the responding programs identified themselves as academic, 3 (8.1%) as hybrid, and 1 (2.7%) as private practice. On average, programs interviewed 15.4 applicants over the interview session, with a range between 2 and 40. There was an average of 2.7 (range 1–8) open positions per fellowship and 1.2 (range 0–4) internal candidates per program. Each program interviewed 5.8 applicants per open position (range 1–24). There were a total of 81 certified MSK fellowship programs and 204 available positions in these programs. Twenty-four programs (29.6%) did not fill all positions resulting in a total of 36 unfilled positions (17.6%). The percentage of MSK unfilled programs, unfilled positions, and unmatched applicants were comparable to the Breast Imaging and Neuroradiology subspecialty matches.
Conclusion
The MSK Fellowship Match was a success with high match rates for applicants and programs. Most importantly, the Match allowed programs to make more informed decisions on their fellowship training opportunities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Radiology match results statistics in the specialities matching service for 2020 appointments. Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program. Accessed 6/12/19.
Demertzis JL, Baker JC, Friedman MV, Resnik CS, Miller TT, Rubin DA. Musculoskeletal radiology fellowship application and selection process: perceptions of residents, fellows, and fellowship directors. Acad Radiol. 2018;25(9):1219–26.
Glover M, Patel TY. The radiology fellowship arms race cannot be won. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(4):461–4.
Pfeifer CM. Breast imaging match highlights the need to unify the approach to fellowship. Acad Radiol. 2018;25(4):543.
Hoffmann JC, Azimov N, Chick JFB, et al. The current status of the interventional radiology fellowship match: results of a resident survey. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018;47(3):146–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gyftopoulos, S., Demertzis, J.L. & Casagranda, B. 2019 musculoskeletal radiology fellowship match process: initial experiences and lessons learned. Skeletal Radiol 49, 1109–1114 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03393-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03393-0