Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A critical evaluation of US for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis in a real-life setting: how can we improve the diagnostic value of sonography?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We have observed that day-to-day use of US for acute appendicitis does not perform as well as described in the literature.

Objective

Review the diagnostic performance of US in acute appendicitis with attention to factors that influence performance.

Materials and methods

Retrospective review of all sonograms for acute appendicitis in children from May 2005 to May 2010 with attention to the rate of identification of the appendix, training of personnel involved and diagnostic accuracy.

Results

The appendix was identified in 246/1,009 cases (24.4%), with identification increasing over time. The accuracy of US was 85–91% with 35 false-positives and 54 false-negatives. Pediatric sonographers were significantly better at identifying the appendix than non-pediatric sonographers (P < 0.0001). Increased weight was the only patient factor that influenced identification of the appendix (P = 0.006). CT use was stable over the 5 years but declined in cases where the appendix was identified by US.

Conclusion

In day-to-day use, US does not perform as purported in the literature. We do not visualize the appendix as often as we should and false-negative and false-positive exams are too common. To improve the diagnostic performance of this modality, involvement by experienced personnel and/or additional training is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brennan GD (2006) Pediatric appendicitis: pathophysiology and appropriate use of diagnostic imaging. CJEM 8:425–432

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ et al (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaiser S, Frenckner B, Jorulf HK (2002) Suspected appendicitis in children: US and CT–a prospective randomized study. Radiology 223:633–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosen MP, Ding A, Blake MA et al (2011) ACR Appropriateness Criteria© right lower quadrant pain-suspected appendicitis. J Am Coll Radiol 8:749–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pohl D, Golub R, Schwartz GE et al (1998) Appendiceal ultrasonography performed by nonradiologists: does it help in the diagnostic process? J Ultrasound Med 17:217–221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Axelrod DA, Sonnad SS, Hirschl RB (2000) An economic evaluation of sonographic examination of children with suspected appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 35:1236–1241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baldisserotto M, Marchiori E (2000) Accuracy of noncompressive sonography of children with appendicitis according to the potential positions of the appendix. AJR 175:1387–1392

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kessler N, Cyteval C, Gallix B et al (2004) Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology 230:472–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baldisserotto M, Peletti AB (2007) Is colour Doppler sonography a good method to differentiate normal and abnormal appendices in children? Clin Radiol 62:365–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gutierrez CJ, Mariano MC, Faddis DM et al (1999) Doppler ultrasound accurately screens patients with appendicitis. Am Surg 65:1015–1017

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Je BK, Kim SB, Lee SH et al (2009) Diagnostic value of maximal-outer-diameter and maximal-mural-thickness in use of ultrasound for acute appendicitis in children. World J Gastroenterol 15:2900–2903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Peletti AB, Baldisserotto M (2006) Optimizing US examination to detect the normal and abnormal appendix in children. Pediatr Radiol 36:1171–1176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Randen A, Lameris W, van Es HW et al (2010) Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis. Eur Radiol 20:1657–1666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P et al (2001) Outer diameter of the vermiform appendix as a sign of acute appendicitis: evaluation at US. Radiology 218:757–762

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rioux M (1992) Sonographic detection of the normal and abnormal appendix. AJR 158:773–778

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hahn HB, Hoepner FU, Kalle T et al (1998) Sonography of acute appendicitis in children: 7 years experience. Pediatr Radiol 28:147–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin AE, Vollman D, Adler B et al (2004) CT scans may not reduce the negative appendectomy rate in children. J Pediatr Surg 39:886–890, discussion 886–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Holscher HC, Heij HA (2009) Imaging of acute appendicitis in children: EU versus U.S. … or US versus CT? A European perspective. Pediatr Radiol 39:497–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wiersma F, Sramek A, Holscher HC (2005) US features of the normal appendix and surrounding area in children. Radiology 235:1018–1022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Crady SK, Jones JS, Wyn T et al (1993) Clinical validity of ultrasound in children with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 22:1125–1129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dilley A, Wesson D, Munden M et al (2001) The impact of ultrasound examinations on the management of children with suspected appendicitis: a 3-year analysis. J Pediatr Surg 36:303–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schuh S, Man C, Cheng A et al (2011) Predictors of non-diagnostic ultrasound scanning in children with suspected appendicitis. J Pediatr 158:112–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Frush KS, Oldham KT (2009) Imaging of acute appendicitis in children: EU versus U.S. … or US versus CT? A North American perspective. Pediatr Radiol 39:500–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Strouse PJ (2010) Pediatric appendicitis: an argument for US. Radiology 255:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Applegate KE, Sivit CJ, Salvator AE et al (2001) Effect of cross-sectional imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children. Radiology 220:103–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hernandez JA, Swischuk LE, Angel CA et al (2005) Imaging of acute appendicitis: US as the primary imaging modality. Pediatr Radiol 35:392–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Simonovsky V (1999) Sonographic detection of normal and abnormal appendix. Clin Radiol 54:533–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ang A, Chong NK, Daneman A (2001) Pediatric appendicitis in “real-time”: the value of sonography in diagnosis and treatment. Pediatr Emerg Care 17:334–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Krishnamoorthi R, Ramarajan N, Wang NE et al (2011) Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA. Radiology 259:231–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldin AB, Khanna P, Thapa M et al (2011) Revised ultrasound criteria for appendicitis in children improve diagnostic accuracy. Pediatr Radiol 41:993–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Migraine S, Atri M, Bret PM et al (1997) Spontaneously resolving acute appendicitis: clinical and sonographic documentation. Radiology 205:55–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pena BM, Taylor GA (2000) Radiologists’ confidence in interpretation of sonography and CT in suspected pediatric appendicitis. AJR 175:71–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Mike D. Smith, Ph.D, for statistical analysis support and Meghan A. Arnold, M.D., Pediatric Surgery, for clinical perspective.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Andrew T. Trout

    Present address: Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, MLC 5031, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology; Section of Pediatric Radiology, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital University of Michigan Medical Center, 1540 E. Hospital Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-4252, USA

    Andrew T. Trout, Ramon Sanchez, Maria F. Ladino-Torres, Deepa R. Pai & Peter J. Strouse

Authors
  1. Andrew T. Trout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ramon Sanchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria F. Ladino-Torres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Deepa R. Pai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter J. Strouse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew T. Trout.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trout, A.T., Sanchez, R., Ladino-Torres, M.F. et al. A critical evaluation of US for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis in a real-life setting: how can we improve the diagnostic value of sonography?. Pediatr Radiol 42, 813–823 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2358-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2358-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation