Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Posterior fossa malformations: main features and limits in prenatal diagnosis

  • Review
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Posterior fossa (PF) malformations are commonly observed during prenatal screening. Their understanding requires knowledge of the main steps of PF development and knowledge of normal patterns in US and MR imaging. The vast majority of PF malformations can be strongly suspected by acquiring a midline sagittal slice and a transverse slice and by systematically scrutinizing the elements of the PF: cerebellar vermis, hemispheres, brainstem, fourth ventricle, PF fluid spaces and tentorium. Analysis of cerebellar echogenicity and biometry is also useful. This review explains how to approach the diagnosis of the main PF malformations by performing these two slices and answering six key questions about the elements of the PF. The main imaging characteristics of PF malformations are also reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jaspan T (2008) New concepts on posterior fossa malformations. Pediatr Radiol 38(Suppl 3):S409–S414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sidman RL (1982) Histology and histopathology of the nervous system In: Haymaker W, Adams RD (eds) Development of the human central nervous system. Thomas CC, Springfield, IL pp 94–110

  3. ten Donkelaar HJ, Lammens M (2009) Development of the human cerebellum and its disorders. Clin Perinatol 36:513–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. ten Donkelaar HJ, Lammens M, Wesseling P et al (2003) Development and developmental disorders of the human cerebellum. J Neurol 250:1025–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Babcook CJ, Chong BW, Salamat MS et al (1996) Sonographic anatomy of the developing cerebellum: normal embryology can resemble pathology. AJR 166:427–433

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Limperopoulos C, Robertson RL, Estroff JA et al (2006) Diagnosis of inferior vermian hypoplasia by fetal magnetic resonance imaging: potential pitfalls and neurodevelopmental outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:1070–1076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson MD Jr, Maher K, Gilles FH (2004) A different approach to cysts of the posterior fossa. Pediatr Radiol 34:720–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson AJ, Blaser S, Toi A et al (2007) The fetal cerebellar vermis: assessment for abnormal development by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Q 23:211–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zalel Y, Seidman DS, Brand N et al (2002) The development of the fetal vermis: an in-utero sonographic evaluation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:136–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zalel Y, Yagel S, Achiron R et al (2009) Three-dimensional ultrasonography of the fetal vermis at 18 to 26 weeks’ gestation: time of appearance of the primary fissure. J Ultrasound Med 28:1–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Malinger G, Lev D, Lerman-Sagie T (2009) The fetal cerebellum. Pitfalls in diagnosis and management. Prenat Diagn 29:372–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Malinger G, Ginath S, Lerman-Sagie T et al (2001) The fetal cerebellar vermis: normal development as shown by transvaginal ultrasound. Prenat Diagn 21:687–692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parazzini C, Righini A, Rustico M et al (2008) Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging: brain normal linear biometric values below 24 gestational weeks. Neuroradiology 50:877–883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tilea B, Alberti C, Adamsbaum C et al (2009) Cerebral biometry in fetal magnetic resonance imaging: new reference data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:173–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Adamsbaum C, Moutard ML, Andre C et al (2005) MRI of the fetal posterior fossa. Pediatr Radiol 35:124–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guibaud L (2004) Practical approach to prenatal posterior fossa abnormalities using MRI. Pediatr Radiol 34:700–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guibaud L, des Portes V (2006) Plea for an anatomical approach to abnormalities of the posterior fossa in prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:477–481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alkan O, Kizilkilic O, Yildirim T (2009) Malformations of the midbrain and hindbrain: a retrospective study and review of the literature. Cerebellum 8:355–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stroustrup Smith A, Levine D, Barnes PD et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of the kinked fetal brain stem: a sign of severe dysgenesis. J Ultrasound Med 24:1697–1709

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zalel Y, Gilboa Y, Gabis L et al (2006) Rotation of the vermis as a cause of enlarged cisterna magna on prenatal imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:490–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Limperopoulos C, Robertson RL Jr, Khwaja OS et al (2008) How accurately does current fetal imaging identify posterior fossa anomalies? AJR 190:1637–1643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fluss J, Blaser S, Chitayat D et al (2006) Molar tooth sign in fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging leading to the prenatal diagnosis of Joubert syndrome and related disorders. J Child Neurol 21:320–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McAuliffe F, Chitayat D, Halliday W et al (2008) Rhombencephalosynapsis: prenatal imaging and autopsy findings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:542–548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Demaerel P (2002) Abnormalities of cerebellar foliation and fissuration: classification, neurogenetics and clinicoradiological correlations. Neuroradiology 44:639–646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guibaud L, Garel C, Annie B et al (2003) Prenatal diagnosis of capillary telangiectasia of the cerebellum—ultrasound and MRI features. Prenat Diagn 23:791–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Merzoug V, Flunker S, Drissi C et al (2008) Dural sinus malformation (DSM) in fetuses. Diagnostic value of prenatal MRI and follow-up. Eur Radiol 18:692–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cameron M, Moran P (2009) Prenatal screening and diagnosis of neural tube defects. Prenat Diagn 29:402–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Garel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garel, C. Posterior fossa malformations: main features and limits in prenatal diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol 40, 1038–1045 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1617-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1617-7

Keywords

Navigation