Skip to main content
Log in

Controlling the Occupation Time of an Exponential Martingale

  • Published:
Applied Mathematics & Optimization Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the problem of maximizing the expected amount of time an exponential martingale spends above a constant threshold up to a finite time horizon. We assume that at any time the volatility of the martingale can be chosen to take any value between \(\sigma _1\) and \(\sigma _2\), where \(0 < \sigma _1 < \sigma _2\). The optimal control consists in choosing the minimal volatility \(\sigma _1\) when the process is above the threshold, and the maximal volatility if it is below. We give a rigorous proof using classical verification and provide integral formulas for the maximal expected occupation time above the threshold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Althöfer, I., Beckmann, M., Salzer, F.: On some random walk games with diffusion control. Advances in Computer Games, pp. 65–75. Springer, Switzerland (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Demengel, G.: Transformations de Laplace: théorie et illustrations par les exemples. Ellipses Éd. Marketing, Paris Cedex (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Folland, G.B.: Fourier Analysis and Its Applications. The Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Mathematics Series. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, Pacific Grove (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jeanblanc, M., Yor, M., Chesney, M.: Mathematical Methods for Financial Markets. Springer Finance. Springer-Verlag, London Ltd, London (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Karatzas, I., Shreve, S.E.: Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus. Volume 113 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keilson, J., Wellner, J.A.: Oscillating Brownian motion. J. Appl. Probab. 15(2), 300–310 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. McNamara, J.M.: Optimal control of the diffusion coefficient of a simple diffusion process. Math. Oper. Res. 8(3), 373–380 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakao, S.: On the pathwise uniqueness of solutions of one-dimensional stochastic differential equations. Osaka J. Math. 9, 513–518 (1972)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Papoulis, A.: The Fourier Integral and Its Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York (1962)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Rogers, L.C.G., Williams, D.: Diffusions, Markov Processes, and Martingales. Cambridge Mathematical Library. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Rudin, W.: Real and Complex Analysis, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

S.A. thanks the Ecole Centrale de Lyon for the kind invitation in May 2015, and the University of Jena for granting a sabbatical leave in the summer 2015. M.J. thanks Jena University for the fruitful invitation in March 2015. The research of M.J. is supported by the Chaire Marchés en Mutation (Fédération Bancaire Française). C.B. thanks Jena University for the invitation in July 2015. We are grateful to Ingo Althöfer for drawing our attention to the topic of diffusion control. Moreover, we thank seminar participants at METU Ankara and the University of Duisburg-Essen for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophette Blanchet-Scalliet.

Appendix

Appendix

We give here the proof that the function \({\hat{g}}\) defined by (18) is causal. We remark that the proof uses standard arguments that can be found e.g. in [2].

Lemma 6.1

For \(t<0\), \({\hat{g}}(t)=0\).

Proof

Let \(t<0\). Observe that the function \(z\mapsto e^{zt}F(z)\) is holomorphic on D. Let \(C_R\) be the line \([-Ri, Ri]\) added by the right-hand side semicircle \(\Gamma _R\) from Ri to \(-Ri\). Then

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{C_R} e^{zt}F(z)dz=0 \end{aligned}$$

To prove that \({\hat{g}}\) is causal, it is enough to prove that \(\lim _{R \rightarrow \infty } \int _{\Gamma _R} e^{zt}F(z)dz=0.\) On \(\Gamma _R\), one has \(|e^{zt}|=e^{tR \cos \theta }\). Moreover, for all \(\epsilon >0\), there exists R large enough such that \(|F(z)|<\epsilon \), for \(z \in \Gamma _R\). Then

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{\Gamma _R} e^{zt}F(z)dz\le 2R\epsilon \int _0^{\frac{\pi }{2}}\exp (Rt \cos \theta )d\theta \end{aligned}$$

As \(t<0\) and \(\sin (\theta ) \ge 2\theta /\pi \), for \(\theta \in [0, \pi /2]\), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \int _0^{\frac{\pi }{2}}\exp (Rt \cos \theta )d\theta = \int _0^{\frac{\pi }{2}}\exp (Rt \sin \theta )d\theta \le \frac{\pi }{2R|t|}(1-\exp (Rt)), \end{aligned}$$

and hence the result.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ankirchner, S., Blanchet-Scalliet, C. & Jeanblanc, M. Controlling the Occupation Time of an Exponential Martingale. Appl Math Optim 76, 415–428 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-016-9356-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-016-9356-2

Keywords

Navigation