Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictive value of biochemical and tissue modifications for wound healing in post-bariatric patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bariatric surgery, despite its beneficial effects, is responsible for highly frequent wound healing complications, as it has already been demonstrated in post-biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) patients.

The aim of this study was to analyze results and wound healing process in a population submitted to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), a procedure involving both a malabsorptive and restrictive approach.

Methods

Thirteen non-smokers and non-diabetic patients submitted to laparoscopic RYGB underwent abdominoplasty. Biochemical parameters before and after bariatric surgery were evaluated. The content of total protein and hydroxyproline (revealing collagen amount) was assessed in multiple biopsies before and after RYGB. Skin samples were subjected to macroscopic and histological evaluation, where elastic fibers content was put into evidence by a specific stain (Wigert–Van Gieson).

Results

Most of the biochemical parameters analyzed showed a mild reduction after weight loss surgery. Neither tissue proteins nor hydroxyproline were significantly reduced after RYGB. Macroscopically, equal thickness of the two adipose tissue layers (areolar and lamellar) was observed in addition to normal consistency and compactness. Histological evaluation revealed fibroblast augmentation, hypertrophic adipocytes, and augmented dimension. Results were then compared with those previously obtained in post-BPD population.

Conclusion

Despite that further elaborations are needed, RYGB, compared to BPD, seems to be associated with minor modifications of tissues and biochemical and tissue parameter values, possibly leading to a lower wound complication rate.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, prognostic study

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pierpont YN, Dinh TP, Salas RE, et al (2014) Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review. ISRN Obes. doi:10.1155/2014/638936

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Van der Beek ES, Van der Molen AM, van Ramshorst B (2011) Complications after body contouring surgery in post-bariatric patients: the importance of a stable weight close to normal. Obes Facts 4(1):61–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aasheim ET (2008) Wernicke encephalopathy after bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 248(5):714–720

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. D'Ettorre M, Gniuli D, Iaconelli A et al (2010) Wound healing process in post-bariatric patients: an experimental evaluation. Obes Surg 20(11):1552–1558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tambasco D, D'Ettorre M, Gentileschi S et al (2014) Postabdominoplasty wound dehiscence in bariatric patients: biliopancreatic diversion versus gastric bypass: a preliminary study. Ann Plast Surg. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000000195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Banka G, Woodard G, Hernandez-Boussard T et al (2012) Laparoscopic vs open gastric bypass surgery: differences in patient demographics, safety, and outcomes. Arch Surg 147(6):550–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bracaglia R, D'Ettorre M, Gentileschi S et al (2012) "Vest over pants abdominoplasty" in post-bariatric patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:23–27

  8. Bracaglia R, Tambasco D, D’Ettorre M et al (2012) “Inverted Y”: a modified vest-over-pants abdominoplasty pattern following bariatric surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:1179–1185

  9. Jorgensen LN, Olsen L, Kallehave F et al (1995) The wound healing process in surgical patients evaluated by the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and the polyvinyl alcohol sponge: a comparison with special reference to intrapatient variability. Wound Repair Regen 3:527–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pearse AGE (1960) p. 165–75, p. 582–3, p. 816, p. 820–1 Histochemistry, theoretical and applied, 2nd edn. Little Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  11. Drury RAB, Wallington EA, Camerson R (1966) Carleton's histological technique, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  12. D’Ettorre M, Gniuli D, Bracaglia R et al (2013) Dermal histomorphology in Postbariatric patients: Bilopancreatic diversion versus gastric bypass. Ann Plast Surg 71:441–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F et al (2006) Body contouring after weight loss: the plasticbariatric surgery symbiosis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30:374–376

  14. Borud LJ, Warren AG (2006) Body contouring in the postbariatricsurgery patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:82–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Knoetgen J III, Petry PM, Johnson CH (2005) Plastic surgery after bariatric surgery and massive weight loss. Mayo Clin Proc 80:136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vastine VL, Morgan RF, Williams GS et al (1999) Wound complications of abdominoplasty in obese patients. Ann Plast Surg 42:34–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shermak MA, Chang D, Magnuson TH et al (2006) An outcomes analysis of patients undergoing body contouring surgery after massive weight loss. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1026–1031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. D'Ettorre M, Gniuli D, Bracaglia R et al (2012) Micro- and macroscopic structural modification of subcutaneous adipose tissue after bariatric surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:213–214

  19. D'Ettorre M, Bracaglia R, Gentileschi S et al (2013) Micro- and macroscopic tissue modifications after bariatric surgery: bilio-pancreatic diversion vs gastric bypass. Aesthetic Plast Surg 37:846–848

  20. Momeni ABarbour JR, Iorio ML, Oh C, Tung TH, O'Neill PJ (2014) Predictive value of nutritional markers for wound healing complications in bariatric patients undergoing panniculectomy. Ann Plast Surg. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000000188

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fearmonti RM, Blanton M, Bond JE et al (2012) Changes in dermal histomorphology following surgical weight loss versus diet-induced weight loss in the morbidly obese patient. Ann Plast Surg 68(5):507–512

  22. Shermak MA, Mallalieu J, Chang D (2010) Do preexisting abdominal scars threaten wound healing in abdominoplasty? Eplasty 10:e14

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Neaman KC, Hansen JE (2007) Analysis of complications from abdominoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 58:292–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco D’Ettorre.

Ethics declarations

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

Marco D'Ettorre, Damiano Tambasco, Geltrude Mingrone and Roberto Bracaglia declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Patient consent

Patient consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Ettorre, M., Tambasco, D., Mingrone, G. et al. Predictive value of biochemical and tissue modifications for wound healing in post-bariatric patients. Eur J Plast Surg 40, 549–554 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-017-1290-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-017-1290-2

Keywords

Navigation