Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The pathophysiology of the aqueduct stroke volume in normal pressure hydrocephalus: can co-morbidity with other forms of dementia be excluded?

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Variable results are obtained from the treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) by shunt insertion. There is a high correlation between NPH and the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) on brain biopsy. There is an overlap between AD and vascular dementia (VaD), suggesting that a correlation exists between NPH and other forms of dementia. This study seeks to (1) understand the physiological factors behind, and (2) define the ability of, the aqueduct stroke volume to exclude dementia co-morbidity. Twenty-four patients from a dementia clinic were classified as having either early AD or VaD on the basis of clinical features, Hachinski score and neuropsychological testing. They were compared with 16 subjects with classical clinical findings of NPH and 12 aged-matched non-cognitively impaired subjects. MRI flow quantification was used to measure aqueduct stroke volume and arterial pulse volume. An arterio-cerebral compliance ratio was calculated from the two volumes in each patient. The aqueduct stroke volume was elevated in all three forms of dementia, with no significant difference noted between the groups. The arterial pulse volume was elevated by 24% in VaD and reduced by 35% in NPH, compared to normal (P=0.05 and P=0.002, respectively), and was normal in AD. There was a spectrum of relative compliance with normal compliance in VaD and reduced compliance in AD and NPH. The aqueduct stroke volume depends on the arterial pulse volume and the relative compliance between the arterial tree and brain. The aqueduct stroke volume cannot exclude significant co-morbidity in NPH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W, Jungling FD, Droste DW, Wakhloo AK (1997) Flow void of cerebrospinal fluid in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly: can it predict outcome after shunting?. Neurosurgery 40:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vanneste J, Augustijn P, Dirven C, Tan WF, Goedhart ZD (1992) Shunting normal pressure hydrocephalus: do the benefits outweigh the risks? A multicentre study and literature review. Neurology 42:54–59

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley WG Jr, Scalzo D, Queralt J, Nitz WN, Atkinson DJ, Wong P (1996) Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiology 198:523–529

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greitz D (2004) Radiological assessment of hydrocephalus: new theories and implications for therapy. Neurosurg Rev 27:147–165

    Google Scholar 

  5. Egnor M, Zheng L, Rosiello A, Gutman F, Davis R (2002) A model of pulsations in communicating hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 36:281–303

    Google Scholar 

  6. Savolainen S, Paljarvi L, Valpalahti M (1999) Prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease in patients investigated for presumed normal pressure hydrocephalus: a clinical and neuropathological study. Acta Neurochir (Wein) 141:849–853

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bradley WG Jr, Whittemore AR, Watanabe AS, Davis SJ, Teresi LM, Homyak M (1991) Association of deep white matter infarction with chronic communicating hydrocephalus: implications regarding the possible origin of normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 12:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W, et al (1997) White matter lesions in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and in an age-matched control group: a comparative study. Neurosurgery 40:491–495

    Google Scholar 

  9. Skoog I (1991) Vascular factors in dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 13:106–114

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bateman GA (2002) Pulse-wave encephalopathy: a comparative study of the hydrodynamics of leukoaraiosis and normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology 44:740–748

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dixon GR, Friedman JA, Luetmer PH, et al (2002) Use of cerebrospinal fluid flow rates measured by phase-contrast MR to predict outcome of ventriculoperitoneal shunting for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Mayo Clin Proc 77:509–514

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bradley WG (2002) Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and shunt responsiveness in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Mayo Clin Proc 77:507–508

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mase M, Yamada K, Banno T, Miyachi T, Ohara S, Matsumoto T (1998) Quantitative analysis of CSF flow dynamics using MRI in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir 71 [Suppl]:350–353

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barkhof F, Kouwenhonen M, Scheltens P, Sprenger M, Algra P, Valk J (1994) Phase contrast cine MR imaging of normal aqueductal CSF flow: effect of aging and relation to CSF void on modulus MR. Acta Radiol 35:123–130

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stollman AL, George AE, Pinto RS, de Leon MJ (1986) Periventricular high signal lesions in a single void on magnetic resonance imaging in hydrocephalus. Acta Radiol 369 [Suppl]:388–391

    Google Scholar 

  16. Turner MS, Goodman JM (1998) Comment on “correlation between lumbo-ventricular perfusion and MRI-CSF flow studies in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus”. Surg Neurol 49:20

    Google Scholar 

  17. Greitz D, Wirestam R, Frank A, Nordell B, Thomsen C, Stahlberg F (1992) Pulsatile brain movement and associated hydrodynamics studied by magnetic resonance phase imaging. The Monro–Kellie doctrine revisited. Neuroradiology 34:370–380

    Google Scholar 

  18. Du Boulay GH, O’Connell J, Currie J, Bostick T, Verity P (1972) Further investigations on pulsatile movements in the cerebrospinal fluid pathways. Acta Radiol 13:496–523

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bateman GA (2001) Toward a better understanding of normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:596

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cordoso ER, Rowan JO, Galbrath S (1983) Analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid pulse wave in intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 59:817–821

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ohara S, Nagai H, Matsumoto T (1988) MR imaging of CSF pulsatory flow and its relation to intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 69:675–682

    Google Scholar 

  22. Luetmer PH, Huston J, Friedman JA, et al (2002) Measurement of cerebrospinal fluid flow at the cerebral aqueduct by use of phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: technique validation and utility in diagnosing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 50:534–542

    Google Scholar 

  23. Black PM, Ojemann RG, Tzouras A (1985) CSF shunts for dementia, incontinence and gait disturbance. Clin Neurosurg 32:632–651

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bateman GA (2000) Vascular compliance in normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1574–1585

    Google Scholar 

  25. Uftring SJ, Chu D, Alperin N, Levin DN (2000) The mechanical state of intracranial tissues in elderly subjects studied by imaging CSF and brain pulsations. Magn Reson Imaging 18:991–996

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bateman GA (2004) Pulse wave encephalopathy: a spectrum hypothesis incorporating Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia and normal pressure hydrocephalus. Med Hypotheses 62:182–187

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Australian Brain Foundation and the John Hunter Hospital Research Committee for granting funding for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grant A. Bateman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bateman, G.A., Levi, C.R., Schofield, P. et al. The pathophysiology of the aqueduct stroke volume in normal pressure hydrocephalus: can co-morbidity with other forms of dementia be excluded?. Neuroradiology 47, 741–748 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-005-1418-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-005-1418-0

Keywords

Navigation